Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

'We know where Jack the Ripper lived'-experts

jack the ripper flower and dean street

  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 38,590 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • "Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better." - Albert Einstein

Posted 06 June 2014 - 03:15 PM

It is a mystery that has eluded detectives for more than a century, but criminologists now believe they know where Jack the Ripper lived.

By using the latest geographical profiling techniques based on the locations of the Ripper's five victims, experts believe the Victorian serial killer lived in Flower and Dean Street in London's notorious East End.

http://www.telegraph...ed-experts.html

Posted Image

#2    RabidMongoose

RabidMongoose

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 582 posts
  • Joined:10 May 2014

Posted 06 June 2014 - 03:46 PM

View PostStill Waters, on 06 June 2014 - 03:15 PM, said:

It is a mystery that has eluded detectives for more than a century, but criminologists now believe they know where Jack the Ripper lived.

By using the latest geographical profiling techniques based on the locations of the Ripper's five victims, experts believe the Victorian serial killer lived in Flower and Dean Street in London's notorious East End.

http://www.telegraph...ed-experts.html

The police put crime maps up on the internet and you can easily use them to determine where criminals live. Suppose someone likes breaking into cars to steal dvd players and does 10 of them over a few months.

People dont steal from their own doorstep they travel a few streets away to do it. By plotting each car break in on a map you can determine the centre point where they are traveling out from. The more crimes the more accurate it becomes and its possible to narrow it down to just a few houses on a street with enough thefts.

Murderers either travel away to kill (so Police attention isnt drawn to where they live) or they kill where they live then travel away to dump the body (again so Police attention isnt drawn to where they live). Serial killers are caught by plotting each crime on a map and again determining the centre point that the criminal is traveling out from.

If Jack the Ripper didn't know about criminology I suspect he was traveling into London to commit each killing. This is because he wasnt dumping bodies he was leaving them where they were killed. That means he felt confident Police attention wouldn't be drawn to where he lived so he took no counter measures.

He most likely had a relevative or friend he was visiting each time. By plotting each killing on a map, where that friend or relative lives can be determined to within a few streets as the centre point he was traveling out from. Exceptions might be a doctor who travels to his surgery in London, a lecturer, official, commuter, etc.

He would have had an obsessive disorder and obsessed over a traumatic experience to do with prostitutes. His mother would most likely have been one and the source of his traumatic experience. He would have obsessed over it until it consumed him resulting in his elimination of women of ill repute. His obsession would have also mean't he was most likely an alcoholic or abusing drugs as a way to self medicate his obession away (temporarily). A family history of criminal activity will also be present as obsessive disorders are genetic.


#3    mwam007

mwam007

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 21 posts
  • Joined:04 Jun 2014
  • Gender:Male

Posted 09 June 2014 - 01:01 PM

Maybe there is more than one person behind the mystery, meaning there could be a chance there was copycats or he was working with someone else.


#4    dr no

dr no

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,506 posts
  • Joined:27 May 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The North of England

  • Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense.
    Carl Sagan

Posted 09 June 2014 - 01:48 PM

View Postmwam007, on 09 June 2014 - 01:01 PM, said:

Maybe there is more than one person behind the mystery, meaning there could be a chance there was copycats or he was working with someone else.

Agreed,I am not convinced all 5 murders are by the same man


#5    regi

regi

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,462 posts
  • Joined:28 May 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 09 June 2014 - 01:48 PM

There's just now been a geographic profile used in this case? :unsure2:


#6    Poltergeistnz

Poltergeistnz

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 77 posts
  • Joined:22 Apr 2014

Posted 10 June 2014 - 12:04 AM

Now this is interesting. So... do any of the known suspects reside there or near there?


#7    RabidMongoose

RabidMongoose

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 582 posts
  • Joined:10 May 2014

Posted 10 June 2014 - 03:37 PM

View Postregi, on 09 June 2014 - 01:48 PM, said:

There's just now been a geographic profile used in this case? :unsure2:

With the interest from criminologists a geographical and personal profile will have been done countless times over the decades. You can't really take newspaper stories, or even television programs, as accurate.

They'll know where he traveled out from to commit murder, they'll know his age, his level of education, the trigger that made him start killing, his mental disorders, traumatic experiences in his life and the nature of his relationship with his mother.

Edited by RabidMongoose, 10 June 2014 - 03:37 PM.


#8    regi

regi

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,462 posts
  • Joined:28 May 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 10 June 2014 - 06:04 PM

View PostRabidMongoose, on 10 June 2014 - 03:37 PM, said:

With the interest from criminologists a geographical and personal profile will have been done countless times over the decades.

Oh, indeed! Actually, it sounds like it's what the original investigators did at the time because- according to that article- they believed he lived in that same location identified by the current experts and I'm not aware of any other evidence on which they'd have based that conclusion.


#9    H. Drake

H. Drake

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 47 posts
  • Joined:07 Feb 2014
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Fake Britain

  • "I know much about nothing, and nothing about much."

Posted 23 June 2014 - 06:50 PM

View Postdr no, on 09 June 2014 - 01:48 PM, said:

Agreed,I am not convinced all 5 murders are by the same man

Which one(s) are you struggling with?

Liz Stride appears to be the most contentious. Apart from the slashed throat, she doesn't have any of the other tell-tale marks of the Ripper. Although it's arguable that he was disturbed before he could finish the job. That's one of the most problematic things about Ripperology. When we're not even sure how many victims he claimed to begin with, it's difficult to build a case.

I wouldn't necessarily rule out Martha Tabram, either. Her attack was definitely a more frenzied one, as she was stabbed almost 40 times, but might it have been a trial-run from the Ripper?


#10    dr no

dr no

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,506 posts
  • Joined:27 May 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The North of England

  • Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense.
    Carl Sagan

Posted 23 June 2014 - 07:20 PM

Funny you should mention Tabram as I think it is a real contender for a ripper murder.I'm not convinced by Stride,would it have been considered a ripper killing if he hadn't struck again?l think once they got the letter mentioning the double event the 2 cases were forever intertwined

The other one I am not sure of is Mary Kelly,I know some people think of it as Jacks twisted masterpiece but I wonder if the outrageous mutilation was the work of either another maniac or somebody who mutilated the corpse in an effort to make it look like one of the rippers victims.I don't pretend to be an expert I've read a few books but something doesn't sit right with the canonical 5 murders for me


#11    H. Drake

H. Drake

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 47 posts
  • Joined:07 Feb 2014
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Fake Britain

  • "I know much about nothing, and nothing about much."

Posted 24 June 2014 - 12:22 PM

View Postdr no, on 23 June 2014 - 07:20 PM, said:

Funny you should mention Tabram as I think it is a real contender for a ripper murder.I'm not convinced by Stride,would it have been considered a ripper killing if he hadn't struck again?l think once they got the letter mentioning the double event the 2 cases were forever intertwined

The other one I am not sure of is Mary Kelly,I know some people think of it as Jacks twisted masterpiece but I wonder if the outrageous mutilation was the work of either another maniac or somebody who mutilated the corpse in an effort to make it look like one of the rippers victims.I don't pretend to be an expert I've read a few books but something doesn't sit right with the canonical 5 murders for me

Hello dr no,

Yeah, I'm not so sure on Tabram. Whoever murdered Tabram was a stabby fellow indeed, whereas the next murders were all slasher jobs. It doesn't seem like 'Jack' honing his skills so much as drastically changing his MO. I think there's a sound possibility that Tabram was butchered by the same (or similar) gang to the one that killed Emma Smith. Who knows, perhaps 'Jack' was part of said gang and decided to fly solo?

You raise a valid point about Mary Kelly. A lot of people have attributed the nature of her mutilation to the fact that she was killed indoors, and therefore 'Jack' had the opportunity had to fully explore his depraved fantasies. And that's a reasonable hypothesis. On the other hand, given she was completely destroyed, and the bedsheet was pulled over her head, (implying that her killer couldn't bare to look at her as he committed the act) and the fact her heart was literally stolen, suggests to me that this could've been a crime of passion. There's a good chance that Mary Kelly knew her murderer in more than just a biblical sense.

Edited by H. Drake, 24 June 2014 - 12:22 PM.


#12    dr no

dr no

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,506 posts
  • Joined:27 May 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The North of England

  • Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense.
    Carl Sagan

Posted 24 June 2014 - 01:50 PM

View PostH. Drake, on 24 June 2014 - 12:22 PM, said:

Hello dr no,

Yeah, I'm not so sure on Tabram. Whoever murdered Tabram was a stabby fellow indeed, whereas the next murders were all slasher jobs. It doesn't seem like 'Jack' honing his skills so much as drastically changing his MO. I think there's a sound possibility that Tabram was butchered by the same (or similar) gang to the one that killed Emma Smith. Who knows, perhaps 'Jack' was part of said gang and decided to fly solo?

You raise a valid point about Mary Kelly. A lot of people have attributed the nature of her mutilation to the fact that she was killed indoors, and therefore 'Jack' had the opportunity had to fully explore his depraved fantasies. And that's a reasonable hypothesis. On the other hand, given she was completely destroyed, and the bedsheet was pulled over her head, (implying that her killer couldn't bare to look at her as he committed the act) and the fact her heart was literally stolen, suggests to me that this could've been a crime of passion. There's a good chance that Mary Kelly knew her murderer in more than just a biblical sense.

Hello Sir

What's your position on Stride?
I think Tabram was possibly a prototype Ripper murder but now you mention Emma Smith and a possible solo member of the gang who branched out it is a pretty decent theory to me.
Yes the more I read about Mary Kelly the more I felt it wasn't Jack.There seems something personal to that killing,,it seems like the killer was possibly trying to mimic a Jack murder, based on local gossip about the injuries inflicted, to cover his tracks.I agree whoever killed her totally obliterated her.
Have you got a favourite suspect for Jack by the way?


#13    H. Drake

H. Drake

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 47 posts
  • Joined:07 Feb 2014
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Fake Britain

  • "I know much about nothing, and nothing about much."

Posted 24 June 2014 - 04:56 PM

View Postdr no, on 24 June 2014 - 01:50 PM, said:

What's your position on Stride?

I don't think Stride can be ruled in or out definitively. However, I do think it's too much of a coincidence that a Ripper 'copycat' murder happens less than hour before a real one takes place. For that reason I'm inclined to believe she was an unfinished Ripper victim. This could also explain why the attack on Eddowes was particularly brutal, because Jack was taking it out on her.

View Postdr no, on 24 June 2014 - 01:50 PM, said:

Have you got a favourite suspect for Jack by the way?

I'm going to be terribly boring and state that 'Jack' in all likelihood, wasn't ANY of the suspects we have listed. He was just another face in the crowd who didn't arouse suspicion and was inconspicuous enough to slip around Whitechapel. He probably lived a relatively normal life by day, and it wasn't until he was alone with his victims that his dark side revealed itself. Doesn't have the allure of Masonic conspiracy, evil doctors or famous painters, I know. Someone like Tumblety, for example, has never appealed to me. Taking into consideration his height and that handlebar mustache, a man of his bearing would've stood out like a sore thumb in the East End of London.

But if you're pushing me for a name, then I'd say Jacob Levy is a better suspect than most.

Yourself?

Edited by H. Drake, 24 June 2014 - 04:57 PM.


#14    dr no

dr no

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,506 posts
  • Joined:27 May 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The North of England

  • Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense.
    Carl Sagan

Posted 24 June 2014 - 05:46 PM

Levy is one of the better suspects,knowledge of anatomy,roaming late at night/early hours,obviously going mad through the syphilis.One argument against him is he never came to Police attention as far as we can tell in connection with the murders but I don't think that should preclude him from being a suspect.

Rather like yourself and Donald Rumbelow (excuse me if it's another ripper author) I think he was an unknown.I think he definitely lived in the area,knew the streets well and wasn't somebody who came slumming it into the East End from one of the upper class areas of London.I don't go for some of the ridiculous theories about him,the first book I read was the Stephen Knight one when I was about 16 & thought it was tripe,I think the theory he was Vincent Van Gogh is one of the most ridiculous theories put forward yet,I must admit I do like to read about different theories even if I don't believe them


#15    Perceptivum

Perceptivum

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 301 posts
  • Joined:29 Jan 2014
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

  • Too many freaks, not enough circuses.

Posted 24 June 2014 - 05:55 PM

View PostH. Drake, on 24 June 2014 - 12:22 PM, said:

Hello dr no,

Yeah, I'm not so sure on Tabram. Whoever murdered Tabram was a stabby fellow indeed, whereas the next murders were all slasher jobs. It doesn't seem like 'Jack' honing his skills so much as drastically changing his MO. I think there's a sound possibility that Tabram was butchered by the same (or similar) gang to the one that killed Emma Smith. Who knows, perhaps 'Jack' was part of said gang and decided to fly solo?

You raise a valid point about Mary Kelly. A lot of people have attributed the nature of her mutilation to the fact that she was killed indoors, and therefore 'Jack' had the opportunity had to fully explore his depraved fantasies. And that's a reasonable hypothesis. On the other hand, given she was completely destroyed, and the bedsheet was pulled over her head, (implying that her killer couldn't bare to look at her as he committed the act) and the fact her heart was literally stolen, suggests to me that this could've been a crime of passion. There's a good chance that Mary Kelly knew her murderer in more than just a biblical sense.

Fascinating insight!!

"Even if you are in a minority of one, the truth is still the truth". - Ghandi

"A conspiracy is a truth awaiting revelation." - Me




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users