I referred to the 1st amendment in relation to his right of free speech about the 2nd amendment, which is the right to bear arms...
Point taken, however, that he used some artistic licence there - I realise there was a six week wait for the gun - but I think the point he was trying to make was the crass incentive used by the bank to get people to open up an account with them. To me that method of promotion is irresponsible. Give them a piggy-bank or something relevant to the nature of the business, you know what I mean?
He may be an extremist to some poeple - but what is it that he is standing for? Gun control isn't it? Surely this would be a step in the right direction? The 2nd amendment was probably very relevant back in 1791 but how relevant is that amendment today? Look at the size of the US armed forces - anyone stupid enough to invade your country (and that is extremely unlikely in my opinion) would be defeated swiftly - therefore is there a need for such widespread gun ownership amongst US citizens? No amount of 'arms' in possession by citizens could have averted the tragedy of those terrorist attacks, for example.
I'm not saying abolish gun ownership altogether. There are perfectly legitimate reasons for gun ownership and I support that wholeheartedly.
Here in Australia I could obtain a licence if I wanted to - but the policies in place ensure I can only own a non-self-loading long-gun (a rifle). Military style automatic weapons are not available, and if I wanted to own a pistol I would need to be in a licenced club.
I'm not saying our policies are perfect (because they aren't). However, Australian national statistics do show the percentage of homicides committed with a firearm in this country has continued along a declining trend since 1969.
In 2001 there were 340 homicides recorded by police in Australia, but I cannot yet quantify the number of homicides committed with a firearm. (source: Aust. Institute of Criminology). As a percentage of the population counted in the 2001 census (18,972,350) this amounts to 0.001% of the population.
One of the issues raised in that documentary seemed to concern the availability of small, automatic, easily concealed weapons, with no practical use (eg hunting) other than to kill people.
I realise this is a very sensitive issue and the views I have stated are merely my opinions - I am in another country after all - but from where I am standing the issue of gun control in the US is something that needs further exploration.