UM-Bot Posted April 26, 2016 #1 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Researchers have succeeded in enhancing the images taken of the ill-fated probe's final resting place. Developed by a team of British academics and headed up by the late Colin Pillinger, Beagle 2 was an ambitious, low-budget spacecraft designed to be carried to Mars as part of ESA's 2003 Mars Express mission where it would detach, descend and land on the planet's surface. Read More: http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/293929/sharper-images-of-beagle-2-on-mars-revealed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe2112 Posted April 26, 2016 #2 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Looks like bigfoot to me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clare256 Posted April 26, 2016 #3 Share Posted April 26, 2016 I don't see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Terreur Posted April 26, 2016 #4 Share Posted April 26, 2016 better than the "UFO pics" we get here.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted April 26, 2016 #5 Share Posted April 26, 2016 Scott Waring is no doubt almost wetting himself finding more HIGH DEF alien skulls, doorways, tanks... and Martians... And Oh no! But great images nonetheless.. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qxcontinuum Posted April 27, 2016 #6 Share Posted April 27, 2016 (edited) It's Swamp gas... Edited April 27, 2016 by qxcontinuum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krater Posted April 27, 2016 #7 Share Posted April 27, 2016 No, it's Venus. I'm sure of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltedmusician Posted April 27, 2016 #8 Share Posted April 27, 2016 So we finally get an article showing an amorphous blob on the surface of a planet without the word "pareidolia" in it and it's the fuzziest one yet, but we somehow know that these clumps are a particular probe and that it has been damaged no less. I'm wondering if "parei" means double and "dolia" means standard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastieRunner Posted April 27, 2016 #9 Share Posted April 27, 2016 There goes NASA with the sexually charged images again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark-DK Posted April 27, 2016 #10 Share Posted April 27, 2016 Oh no, its THE BLOB, run...run and hide, in a Marsian Starbucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paperdyer Posted April 27, 2016 #11 Share Posted April 27, 2016 Looks like J'onn J'onzz weight set to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROGER Posted April 27, 2016 #12 Share Posted April 27, 2016 Hey , for years it was just a mystery on if it made it to Mars or not . Years ago some speculation was an in flight collision or craft propulsion system failure had occurred sending it spinning in to an unknown direction . At least we know it made it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis914 Posted April 27, 2016 #13 Share Posted April 27, 2016 Who cares where it is as I'm sure it's nothing but a multimillion dollar paperweight now. Let's see some high resolution images of the Martian landscape complete with waving alien crabs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psyche101 Posted April 28, 2016 #14 Share Posted April 28, 2016 So we finally get an article showing an amorphous blob on the surface of a planet without the word "pareidolia" in it and it's the fuzziest one yet, but we somehow know that these clumps are a particular probe and that it has been damaged no less. I'm wondering if "parei" means double and "dolia" means standard. That fact that we have trajectories and a last known place of transmission makes all the difference here. We were looking for a "blob" in that location, we didn't find one and start guessing what planet it might have come from or what sort of alien it might be. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DieChecker Posted April 28, 2016 #15 Share Posted April 28, 2016 So is the wreckage site 3 meters across or 10 feet across... Might be a problem in converting the units there.... :w00t: :w00t: :w00t: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Willis Posted April 29, 2016 #16 Share Posted April 29, 2016 So is the wreckage site 3 meters across or 10 feet across... Might be a problem in converting the units there.... :w00t: :w00t: :w00t: I thought it was the Mars Climate Orbiter that failed because of the mix up with units. Beagle 2 failed because it was made from pizza trays. Mind you, no expense was spared and Teflon-coated trays were used! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DieChecker Posted April 29, 2016 #17 Share Posted April 29, 2016 I thought it was the Mars Climate Orbiter that failed because of the mix up with units. Beagle 2 failed because it was made from pizza trays. Mind you, no expense was spared and Teflon-coated trays were used! Exactly so. Thanks for the correction/update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now