Jump to content

Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.

- - - - -

Jupiter is king as 23 more moons found

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1    Althalus


    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,909 posts
  • Joined:12 Jan 2002
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England

Posted 17 May 2003 - 12:30 PM

                                                  PARIS (AFP) - Astronomers say they have detected nearly two dozen more satellites orbiting Jupiter, bringing the number of moons encircling the Solar System's greatest planet to an astonishing 60.

The 23 newcomers are tiny objects between just two and eight kilometers (1.1 and five miles) across, making them the smallest moons ever to be detected from Earth.

The discoverers, Scott Sheppard and David Jewitt of the Institute for Astronomy at the University of Hawaii, have already notched up many jovian moons to their credit.

The newly-found satellites have tilted, irregular orbits, which suggests they were lonely bodies that wandered the heavens until, billions of years ago, they were sucked into Jupiter's gravitational maw and never escaped.

Jupiter now has 52 of these "irregulars," according to their tally, which is reported on Thursday in Nature, the weekly British science weekly.

In contrast to these are Jupiter's eight "regular" satellites.

These are believed to have condensed from the same cloud of gas and dust that formed their parent, and circle the planet close in, tracking in tidy, circular, equatorial orbits.

The discovery restores Jupiter to its pre-eminence as the planet with the most moons.

The gassy giant accounts by itself for nearly half of the 128 known planetary moons in the Solar System.

Its closest rivals are Saturn, with 31 detected so far, followed by Uranus, with 21, and Neptune, 11.

The discovery is technically significant, because it shows how high-powered telescopes combined with modern computers can capture tiny objects in irregular orbits.

University of Maryland astronomer Douglas Hamilton believes the jovian king "will dominate the moon count for the foreseeable future," partly because it is closer to the Sun than the others and so its moons reflect more light.

The huge boost in moon detections poses something of a headache for the International Astronomical Union (IAU), the Paris-based association that vets astronomers' claims and attributes names to their discoveries.

The nomenclature of jovian moons builds on a tradition dating back to 1613, when Dutch astronomers Johannes Kepler and Simon Marius thought it would be fun to name them after Zeus' many lovers. Jupiter is the Latin name for Zeus, the ruler of the Olympian gods.

As Zeus had a long list of amorous conquests, it was quite easy to baptise new moons as they were gradually identified over the centuries.

But in recent years, dozens more moons have been added to the list.

The IAU has thus had to go beyond Zeus' little black book, and name the new moons after children or relatives of the lovers.

The last big update was in December 2002, when Themisto, a jealous child-killer; Taygete, a beautiful virgin who committed suicide; and Harpalyke, a hunter-warrior who could outrun a horse, were among 11 admitted to the list.

Yahoo News                                                  

"We make choices everyday, some of them good, some of them bad. And - if we are strong enough - we live with the consequences."
David Gemmell

#2    SpaceyKC


    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,349 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2001
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:United States

  • Thank you TO

Posted 17 May 2003 - 12:43 PM

                                                  Thanks for that Al,  I wasn't even aware of the large number of moons already discovered.   ohmy.gif

(and here we are with only one, and it doesn't even get a cool name )  dry.gif                                                  

"Science may have found a cure for most evils;  but it has
         found no remedy for the worst of them all --- the apathy of human beings."
                                                     Helen Keller

#3    Loonboy



  • Member
  • 2,852 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2001
  • Location:York

Posted 18 May 2003 - 12:27 PM


I think Jupiter is just being a little bit greedy, hogging all the moons.


Do what you want and be what you feel. Because after all, those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't 'mind.

Work hard, keep the ceremonies, live peacably, and unite your hearts. Hopi

Listen to the voice of nature, for it holds treasures for you. Huron

The soul would have no rainbow if the eyes had no tears. Minquass

#4    Homer


    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,814 posts
  • Joined:16 Mar 2001
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida

Posted 18 May 2003 - 11:51 PM

                                                   laugh.gif @ LB                                                  

אַ֭תָּה אֱלֹהֵ֣י יִשְׁעִ֑י

#5    albaqwerty



  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 280 posts
  • Joined:04 Oct 2002
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 20 May 2003 - 05:21 PM

                                                   tongue.gif LB!

KC, I suppose the next thing to do is run a competition for giving our moon! biggrin.gif
would be cool to see what wonderful names we could come up with!

How many more moons is Jupiter hiding I wonder?? (Greedy thing)

err I wonder what else is out there hiding.........                                                  

growing old is inevitable, growing up is optional

#6    Saru


    Site Webmaster

  • 20,839 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2001
  • Gender:Male

  • "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious." - Albert Einstein

Posted 20 May 2003 - 05:39 PM

                                                  I suppose it might actually become necessary to redefine what can be classed as a 'moon', since a lot of the moons of Jupiter for example are very small indeed, some only a few kilometres across.

Perhaps moons that are of a much larger size, such as Europa, Io, Ganymede, our moon etc. should retain the 'moon' title, whereas smaller ones should simply be referred to as natural satellites for example.

Still, I doubt there will ever really be a practical reason for altering the definition of the word 'moon', not unless they discover thousands more smaller ones in orbit around Jupiter and have a need to better seperate references to them from their much larger neighbours.                                                  

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users