Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

US Fed's Greenspan era draws to a close


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1    __Kratos__

__Kratos__

    -Staring-

  • Member
  • 25,876 posts
  • Joined:13 Oct 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Inside the moon

  • As darkness falls, night unfolds ebony wings to wrap the world in it's dark embrace.

Posted 30 January 2006 - 09:17 AM

It will be business as usual when Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan wraps up nearly two decades at the Fed tomorrow.

He probably will raise interest rates one last time as he presides over the Federal Open Market Committee. Afterward, there will be a low-key luncheon with his colleagues and a reception for Fed staffers.

Greenspan will be leaving on top -- rare in Washington -- when he walks out the door of the Fed's imposing marble building.

Widely viewed as the most successful chairman in the Fed's 92-year history, Greenspan presided over an era of low inflation rates, low unemployment and the longest economic expansion in US history -- a decade of uninterrupted growth from March 1991 to March 2001.

Greenspan was a master in handling not only the economy but also the treacherous waters of politics. He won nominations for the Fed job from four presidents -- three Republicans and one Democrat. The occasional critics said he was too political.

Upset over Greenspan's support of US President George W. Bush's tax cuts, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, said Greenspan was "one of the biggest political hacks we have in Washington."

In Greenspan's early days, Wall Street investors also harbored concern that Greenspan, who had advised Republican presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan, would lack the iron-willed independence needed to fill the shoes of Paul Volcker.

Volcker conquered a decade-long bout of double-digit inflation by driving up interest rates to levels not seen since the Civil War.

Showing his own inflation-fighting credentials, Greenspan pushed through a half-point rate increase at his first Fed policy meeting. After just two months on the job, the stock market crashed. It was called Black Monday, Oct. 19, 1987; many blamed Greenspan's credit-tightening.

The Fed declared it stood ready to lend freely to distressed institutions. It was a policy that would become a hallmark of Greenspan's tenure. The market stabilized and began rising. So did Greenspan's star.

It was the first of many economic crises that would confront Greenspan.

From 1989 to 1992, hundreds of savings and loans and banks -- more than at any time since the Great Depression -- went out of business.

A global currency crisis began in Asia in 1997 and spread to Russia. Some 40 percent of the global economy was pushed into recession. The US economy was seriously threatened before Greenspan's Fed stepped in with a series of rapid-fire rate reductions in the fall of 1998.

The stock market bubble burst in 2000, wiping out trillions of dollars in paper wealth.

During Greenspan's 18-and-a-half years in office, the country had two recessions. The first was in 1990-1991, when oil prices spiked after Iraq invaded Kuwait. The second came in 2001 in the aftermath of the steep plunge in stock prices in the previous year. Both were mild downturns that lasted eight months each.

By contrast, in the 18 years before Greenspan took over at the Fed, the US experienced four severe downturns.

By the numbers, the overall economy has done well during Greenspan's terms.

Consumer inflation soared as high as 13.3 percent in 1979 amid a decade of oil shocks. It was at 3.4 percent last year, even though the country was hit by another oil surge that pushed gasoline prices above US$3 per gallon (3.8 liter).

Unemployment stands at 4.9 percent after dropping to a four-decade low of 4 percent in 2000. Greenspan was able to convince skeptical Fed colleagues that rising productivity would allow jobless rates to fall without triggering inflation.

Private analysts believe Greenspan is being modest.

"Greenspan has had the most successful tenure in Fed history. He kept inflation under very tight control while avoiding any major recessions," said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's in New York.

Of course, there were some controversies.

Many analysts cite Greenspan's decision to support the current president's tax cuts in 2001. They helped push the federal budget from trillion-dollar surpluses to record deficits.

Greenspan says he would recommend tax cuts again, given projections -- which failed to happen -- of budget surpluses that would total US$5.6 trillion over a decade.

He is also faulted for failing to rein in the high-flying stock market in time. He did famously wonder in 1996 whether investors could be in the grip of "irrational exuberance." But prices kept climbing. When the bubble burst, Greenspan moved to contain the damage by lowering interest rates.

"If Greenspan had been stronger in his views, then the bubble would not have been as large and the subsequent correction not as severe," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com.

Greenspan's response: To pop the bubble earlier, the Fed would have had to raise interest rates so high that the country would have been pushed into a severe recession. As his influence grew, Greenspan was called upon to advance opinions on matters beyond the realm of monetary policy. Not only did he lend support to Bush's tax cuts, but eight years earlier he blessed former US president Bill Clinton's tax increases to deal with troubling budget deficits.

This opened him to attacks from both Republicans and Democrats.

By comparison, Ben Bernanke, the former Princeton economics professor selected to succeed Greenspan, says he plans to limit his public advice to areas directly under the Fed's control.

Bernanke has also pledged to follow the Greenspan play book when it comes to running the economy.

That may turn out to be Greenspan's most lasting legacy.

Source
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite a long service.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." ~Philip K. Dick

"Passion, peace. Strength, knowledge. Power, serenity. Victory, harmony. Freedom, the Force." ~Ashara Zavros

#2    AdNauseamSuiGeneris

AdNauseamSuiGeneris

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 505 posts
  • Joined:17 Oct 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long Beach, New York

  • A man's character is his fate.

Posted 30 January 2006 - 01:01 PM

I won't miss him.


If God is willing to prevent evil, but is not able to
Then He is not omnipotent.
If He is able, but not willing
Then He is malevolent.
If He is both able and willing
Then whence cometh evil?
If He is neither able nor willing
Then why call Him God?
-Epicurus




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users