Posted 14 March 2006 - 04:00 AM
INTRODUCTION
Truly an incredible subject for a debate, the topic of street smarts vs book smarts certainly encompasses all that is demonstrated in a well argued debate. It in fact could be paralleled into the concept of form vs function, in this case form being studies themselves, the term book smart encompassing the grasp on the higher educations, trying to understand how and why things work, while function being the practicality of a street smart individual, namely being not too concerned with how or why things happen, though able to put their education into use in a much more functional manner.
The educations themselves must be addressed however, as a book smart education is earned through the mind, namely studying and applying ones mental prowess to the task of enhancing said intelligence level. that is not to discredit street smart, which bases its education on personal experiences and a waryness obtained from a life in which intelligence was gained not through study and experimentation, but rather trial and error, finding what is most effective and doing so.
However, as this is a debate, i must have a side in this argument, and said side being the book smarts. i did have to mention a bit into the definition of street smarts however, to provide an adequate contrast for my argument.
While it is true in the sense of practicallity street smarts does take the advantage, however street smarts is unable to grasp the big picture, something that is only done with study. moreover, it is street smarts very practicality which also serves as a hinderance, as street tends to specialize in a certain way, namely perfecting a certain function or ability. however with book smarts, there is no limit to the levels of specialization one can attain. therefor, for being a bit more difficult, capable of understanding the how's and whys, and a great deal more generally applicable, book smarts is the clear winner in this debate.
Let the record stand, AC is blind.