If as everyone is saying, that the American Government faked the moon landing, to get ahead of Russia, then surely they now have the ability to land on the moon? If so, then why haven’t they? Why haven’t they tried since the 1960’s?
0
No moon landing since 60’s?
If it was fake, then why not try now?
Started by Kryso , Sep 28 2003 08:06 PM
Started by Kryso , Sep 28 2003 08:06 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Kryso
-
- Member
-
- 3,943 posts
Always watching...
- Joined:21 Sep 2003
- Gender:Male
- Location:England
-
Truth titillates the imagination far less than fiction.
Posted 28 September 2003 - 08:06 PM
Sinuous Mind Books 'Like' our Facebook Page to support a small online independent publisher.
#2
Magikman
-
- Member
-
- 6,280 posts
Most Exalted member of the first 15
- Joined:06 Mar 2001
- Gender:Male
- Location:United States
-
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
Posted 28 September 2003 - 08:39 PM
Simple explanation, money. The moon doesn't offer anything of significant value to justify the expense to continue exploration. They have enough trouble getting required funding for satellite missions.
Skeptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep insights can be winnowed from deep nonsense. ~ Carl Sagan
"...man has an irrepressible tendency to read meaning into the buzzing confusion of sights and sounds impinging on his senses; and where no agreed meaning can be found, he will provide it out of his own imagination." ~ Arthur Koestler
"...man has an irrepressible tendency to read meaning into the buzzing confusion of sights and sounds impinging on his senses; and where no agreed meaning can be found, he will provide it out of his own imagination." ~ Arthur Koestler
#3
bigsteff
-
- Member
-
- 312 posts
Apparition
- Joined:10 Feb 2003
Posted 28 September 2003 - 10:43 PM
ofcourse this could be the reason....it's found at a great website...
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/artic...ollowmoon.shtml
no point going to something that's empty 
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/artic...ollowmoon.shtml
no point going to something that's empty
#4
kpruitt
-
- Member
-
- 14 posts
Alien Embryo
- Joined:27 Sep 2003
Posted 29 September 2003 - 06:42 AM
| QUOTE (Kryso @ Sep 28 2003, 01:06 PM) |
| If as everyone is saying, that the American Government faked the moon landing, to get ahead of Russia, then surely they now have the ability to land on the moon? If so, then why haven’t they? Why haven’t they tried since the 1960’s? |
Apollo 11 was the first moon landing. When Apollo 13 launched people were already bored with sending men to the moon. By the time Apollo 17 made the final moon landing in December of 1972 there was little public interest in going to the moon. In fact there was little interest in the space program at all. It was considered a waste of money. NASA then turned its attention to developing a reusable spacecraft, which they did... the shuttle. Now of course that program's future is in doubt and you'll probably see no manned space flights made by the U.S. until a new launch vehicle is designed, with the exception of us hitching rides in Russian spacecraft up to the space station. There is really no reason for manned landings on the moon any longer. Next stop for Man is Mars. And I imagine we'll be continuing to send unmanned probes to Mars for a very long time before sending men there simple because it's cheaper to send probes.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
