Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Your DNA could finger criminal kin


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1    __Kratos__

__Kratos__

    -Staring-

  • Member
  • 25,876 posts
  • Joined:13 Oct 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Inside the moon

Posted 24 May 2006 - 05:53 AM

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Searching DNA records has become a common practice in criminal investigations. Researchers now suggest this could be taken a step further by looking for close DNA matches that might lead police to a criminal through a relative.

They note that 46 percent of jail inmates have at least one relative who also has been in prison.

But the idea also raises questions of privacy and other ethical and legal concerns.

Researchers led by Frederick R. Bieber of Harvard Medical School estimate that in a case in which there is a 10 percent chance of finding a criminal through a DNA search, expanding the search to suspects' near relatives could raise the chances to 14 percent.

That could represent an increase of thousands of identifications in the United States, where there have been 30,000 identifications through DNA searches, the researchers said in a paper in Thursday's online edition of the journal Science.

They cite the case of a murder in Britain in which the search of that country's DNA database found a 14-year-old boy was a near match to DNA collected as evidence. That led police to the boy's uncle, who confessed to the crime.

In a similar North Carolina case, a search of the state's offender DNA database led to a near but not perfect match. When police followed up, the brother of the individual located through DNA confessed, the researchers reported.

Concerns over privacy
But while there is potential for catching more criminals, the researchers stressed the need to address ethical issues.

The use of familial searching effectively would place a new category of people under lifetime surveillance, they noted.

"Kinship analysis, as with any investigative technique, may lead to the investigation of the innocent," co-author David Lazer of Harvard University said in a statement. "But it would also provide decisive leads in cases that would otherwise go unsolved."

Moses Schanfield, a professor of forensic science at George Washington University, said familial searching is a potentially useful tool, but added that he would expect only a small increase in the number of "hits," referring to finding people in a database.

It "will only be fully effective if every one in jail or charged with a felony has a DNA sample on file, so that your ascertainment is nearly complete. Until then it will be useful in a limited number of cases," said Schanfield, who was not a co-author of the paper.

In addition, he added, it raises privacy issues for relatives that are not involved in crime, but would be identified.

DNA is a two-edge sword, Bieber said in a telephone interview. In addition to finding more criminals, it also has exonerated more than 200 people since 1989, he said.

The question is, how far into the family tree should law enforcement be going, he said, adding that the question goes beyond science and into social and public policy.

"We are often in a balancing act between wanting safety but also not wanting an overly intrusive surveillance," Bieber said.

He also noted that conviction rates vary by race and social class and familial DNA testing would be likely to increase those disparities by putting the families of people already in the criminal database under study.

Many agencies may already use this method whether they know it or not, he added, since in the case of any near match of DNA, it is only logical to consider a close relative.

"Some would consider this a normal investigative technique and consider it unconscionable not to use it to find a violent offender," he added.

The paper was co-written by Bieber, Lazer and Charles H. Brenner of the University of California, Berkeley.
Source
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it wrong treating everybody like felons.  hmm.gif

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." ~Philip K. Dick

#2    IhartU

IhartU

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 196 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Penn's Woods

Posted 24 May 2006 - 02:21 PM

Why don't they file a DNA sample of every baby that is born, they take their blood to do tests anyway? Then they could make a huge file of the DNA of every person born from now on. They'd have to do it this way, because there is no way that adults alive today would voluntarily give a sample. To many people would think this was an invasion of privacy. Plus if they have your DNA, whose to say they could'nt frame you for a crime?
  Criminals in jail should have their fingerprints and their DNA on file. You commit a crime, you loose all your rights, including the right to privacy!


#3    coldethyl

coldethyl

    ~☆~Public Animal #9~☆~

  • Member
  • 16,331 posts
  • Joined:22 Mar 2005
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:~*★*~Under Your Eyelid~*★*~

  • ~*★*~I'm not in this world to live up to your expectations and you're not in this world to live up to mine.
    Bruce Lee~*★*~

Posted 24 May 2006 - 04:08 PM

I think they should take DNA from all criminals as I don't believe they should have any rights but I don't think they should take DNA from babies and keep it on file.


#4    IhartU

IhartU

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 196 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Penn's Woods

Posted 24 May 2006 - 05:52 PM

Quote


I think they should take DNA from all criminals as I don't believe they should have any rights but I don't think they should take DNA from babies and keep it on file.



    Knowing the Government, I wouln'dt doubt that they are already taking DNA from people on the sly.(God I miss the x-files!) alien.gif




#5    Tobias Shamtul

Tobias Shamtul

    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 448 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:akron ohio

  • Darwin Awards: chlorinating the gene pool

Posted 27 May 2006 - 05:55 PM

yea they go in when your asleep  ph34r.gif

Avatar by the barman
Posted Image
http://world3.monste...id&vid=38066931 join me and destroy the vampires




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users