Who here supports Sitchens theory
#2
Posted 11 March 2007 - 02:56 PM
Quote
I do because it makes more sense (to me) than any other theory. It answers almost all questions and seems quite logical and possible based on the ancient texts and so forth. I have read extensively (thousands and more books) and I like this theory. Our current UFO and alien experiences fit like a glove onto this theory. I love his books and I wish he would write one about "newer" times...jesus etc.
#3
Posted 11 March 2007 - 04:31 PM
Sitchin has been proven to -- if not out and lie about his translations, then be liberal enough with the translations that no-one with serious training in ancient languages credit them.
The existence of a larger-than-Jupiter size planet in an eccentric orbit in this solar system would disprove literally everything we currently know about gravity.
The putative biology of such a planet is at best extremely questionable.
--Jaylemurph
Deeply venial
#6
Posted 11 March 2007 - 07:21 PM
Here's his Web site and you can make up your own mind (and he really needs to get off the front page templates, dang that site is ugly. haha): http://www.sitchin.com/
#7
Posted 11 March 2007 - 07:27 PM
Quote
According to Sitchin, Nibiru was the home of a technologically advanced human-like extraterrestrial race, called the Anunnaki in Sumerian myth who were called the Nephilim in the Bible. He claims that they first arrived on Earth probably 450,000 years ago, looking for minerals, especially gold, which they found and mined in Africa. These "gods" of the Anunnaki were the rank and file workers of the colonial expedition to earth from planet Nibiru. Sitchin believes that the Anunnaki genetically engineered Homo sapiens as slave animals to work in their gold mines by crossing extraterrestrial genes with those of Homo erectus.
Wikipedia
No, I don't believe his theory at all. It's completely idiotic.
· When it's salvation that you want? ·

#9
Posted 11 March 2007 - 07:57 PM
Quote
--Jaylemurph
Going more in-depth.
Assuming that Nibiru could support life, it has to be solid. Coupling that with it's larger than Jupiter size, it couldn't even exist in the Oort cloud without altering the trajectory of Earth, so claiming that such a body could reach the inner solar-system without completely ripping Earth apart is beyond me.
Also, all I've seen Sitchen successfully do is get rich off of people uneducated in the required fields of study to understand how ludicrous the idea is.
"Make yourself a good future by living in the now, and never letting now end."
--The Herb--
#10
Posted 12 March 2007 - 01:36 PM
Quote
Assuming that Nibiru could support life, it has to be solid. Coupling that with it's larger than Jupiter size, it couldn't even exist in the Oort cloud without altering the trajectory of Earth, so claiming that such a body could reach the inner solar-system without completely ripping Earth apart is beyond me.
Also, all I've seen Sitchen successfully do is get rich off of people uneducated in the required fields of study to understand how ludicrous the idea is.
Sitchen and the Sumerians actually state that is a dwarf planet I personally belive and support this theory as when you read a lot of what he has to saya nd what the ancients say it just adds up to me and I believe that there is enough facts to support it unlike religion(no offence) that goes off what people who can heal say and then everyone take it as though they are people who have been put here by god(in most cases)...I just think there is good hard facts to support his theory but thanks for you guys opinions on this and why because it gives a different out look to it and gives both sides of views
#11
Posted 12 March 2007 - 01:38 PM
#12
Posted 12 March 2007 - 01:51 PM
I certainly never disregarrd anyone's claims based on evidence like this:
Quote
When people are labeled like this it just makes them more credible to me sometimes.
#13
Posted 12 March 2007 - 02:00 PM
Might as well ask who supports George Lucas' theory.....
#14
Posted 12 March 2007 - 02:15 PM
Quote
The problem to agree with it is he does not have the required proof.
On the other hand science is getting like the Church in the middle ages. Anything that is not with accordance with the scinecetists is labled wrong and blasphemic.
I like Stichin. If he is right, I do not know. But what I am sure of is that there is more to our history than the dinosaur fossils. We are not alone in this Space, nor did we invent Life.
Our being is proof that nothing is imposible other than our mind to recognize it.

Sig by Stardrive
#15
Posted 12 March 2007 - 04:15 PM
I'm sorry, but thousands of reports over the span of a millennium is very surprising. UFO reports surface everyday. Aliens exist. Whether Sitchen's theories are correct for false I do not know, but all I know is that they are more accurate then some theories....
1. He's a cartoon cat.
2. He's black & white.
3. He's in competition with Hobbes, Garfield, Kool Kat, Tom Cat, Tom, and Sylvester.
Sign In
Register
Help
Board Index



Top
MultiQuote










