Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums: Who here supports Sitchens theory - Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 38 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • »
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • You cannot start a new topic

Who here supports Sitchens theory Rate Topic: ***-- 4 Votes

#16 User is offline   MareikuraOAroha 


  • Alien Embryo
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 10-March 07
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Earth

  • "Let your mind and soul be free and then shall come eternity"

Posted 12 March 2007 - 11:08 PM

Quote

If humans were made from sand and dust, wouldn't we disintegrate from water?

I'm sorry, but thousands of reports over the span of a millennium is very surprising. UFO reports surface everyday. Aliens exist. Whether Sitchen's theories are correct for false I do not know, but all I know is that they are more accurate then some theories....


I deffinently do not believe that humans were made of sand and all the rest of the carry on but I do believe in us being a hybrid race created with blood of that of the aliens(Anunnaki) and I agree with you they are more accurate and much more logical with all the facts he presents

#17 User is offline   jaylemurph 


  • Scientician!
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 7,286
  • Joined: 02-November 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY

  • "Your doubt doesn't matter a jot, sunshine."
    Emma Acid

Posted 13 March 2007 - 02:55 AM

Quote

I deffinently do not believe that humans were made of sand and all the rest of the carry on but I do believe in us being a hybrid race created with blood of that of the aliens(Anunnaki) and I agree with you they are more accurate and much more logical with all the facts he presents



...so the existence of super- (or at least preter)naturally advanced race from an impossible planet in an impossible orbit genetically modifying hominids for slaves to mine gold to save their atmosphere and then ****ing them, scarpering it all, destroying almost all the evidence and going home, only to have the whole story dug up and mistranslated by an economic historian IS MORE LOGICAL than the scientific model of evolution on Earth?

*shakes head
Oh my. Oh my goodness...
"... amongst the most obstinate of our opinions may be classed those which derive from discussions in which we affect to search for the truth, while in reality we are only fortifying prejudice." -- James Fenimore Cooper, The Pathfinder

Posted Image

Deeply venial

#18 User is offline   odas 


  • Psychic Spy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 1,430
  • Joined: 13-November 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario, a place to grow..

Posted 13 March 2007 - 12:23 PM

Quote

...so the existence of super- (or at least preter)naturally advanced race from an impossible planet in an impossible orbit genetically modifying hominids for slaves to mine gold to save their atmosphere and then ****ing them, scarpering it all, destroying almost all the evidence and going home, only to have the whole story dug up and mistranslated by an economic historian IS MORE LOGICAL than the scientific model of evolution on Earth?

*shakes head
Oh my. Oh my goodness...


Good. I do have a problem with "impossible" though. Please explain what is impossible.

People say it is impossible that there are other lifeforms like ours somwhere in the universe. If it was possible here why not elswhere?
Posted Image
Sig by Stardrive

#19 User is offline   MareikuraOAroha 


  • Alien Embryo
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 10-March 07
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Earth

  • "Let your mind and soul be free and then shall come eternity"

Posted 13 March 2007 - 12:26 PM

Quote

...so the existence of super- (or at least preter)naturally advanced race from an impossible planet in an impossible orbit genetically modifying hominids for slaves to mine gold to save their atmosphere and then ****ing them, scarpering it all, destroying almost all the evidence and going home, only to have the whole story dug up and mistranslated by an economic historian IS MORE LOGICAL than the scientific model of evolution on Earth?

*shakes head
Oh my. Oh my goodness...


You missed out sooo much information in between...I personally think people need to read these things and think about things with an open mind otherwise you will never understand things and you will interpret them wrong because you might think it is rediculous to start with...Everything you said didnt even begin to sum it up it just basically touched on the events but you forgot sooo much information in between so describing it the way you did and missing all of the vital points in between makes it seem as though it is rediculous...And why could it all be impossible you know these ancient civilisations namely the Sumerians, knew soooo much and were soooo advanced and apparently they were primative and not only that but its just like Jesus...People claim they saw this man Jesus heal and all the rest of it and then they all wrote down in this book about everything he said n all the rest of it and yet people believe there was a man called jesus(im not argueing that he wasnt real)and believe in everything he did yet these ancient people say that they saw these aliens and know what happened and they wrote it all down in their language and no one today believes it and why? because it happened too long ago and it seems too far out(to people on earth at this time) to even comprehend or understand because we are told every single day that god made us and we come from Adam and Eve and all the rest of the hoohaaa

#20 User is offline   Essan 


  • Recruitment Agent for the 'B' Ark
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,068
  • Joined: 18-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The other side

  • Stop Climate Change: Plant a Rain Forest Today!

Posted 13 March 2007 - 02:21 PM

Do you lot believe in Noddy and Big Ears as well?

You do realise that the total evidence in support of Sitchin's theory is as follows:































.


You still think he might be right? And if so why?
Andy

Weather & Earth Science News
The independent climate blog

#21 User is offline   louie 


  • Alien Abducter
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 4,834
  • Joined: 16-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ireland

  • The greatest sceptics are normally the biggest sheep. Anon

Posted 13 March 2007 - 05:20 PM

Quote

Do you lot believe in Noddy and Big Ears as well?

You do realise that the total evidence in support of Sitchin's theory is as follows:
.
You still think he might be right? And if so why?

thats a waste of a post. well empty barrels an all that.
so where is your evidence that stitchens theory is nil. he quoted a few scriptures and agencys NASA stc, so you show me your evidence.

www.tmblive.com
If you dont know what it is, it must be art.

#22 User is offline   jaylemurph 


  • Scientician!
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 7,286
  • Joined: 02-November 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY

  • "Your doubt doesn't matter a jot, sunshine."
    Emma Acid

Posted 13 March 2007 - 05:20 PM

Quote

Good. I do have a problem with "impossible" though. Please explain what is impossible.

People say it is impossible that there are other lifeforms like ours somwhere in the universe. If it was possible here why not elswhere?


Well, "impossible" isn't quite the right word. It's better explained earlier in this thread, but briefly: a planet as large as what Sitchin states (at least the size of Jupiter) would have crushing gravity if were solid (even if it weren't actually). Anything like a man would be crushed in goo on the surface, making it difficult for life like on Earth to evolve. I'm not saying it couldn't evolve its own life, but it wouldn't look anything like Terran life.
Its orbit would be impossible because its gravity would throw several other planets out of their orbits and tear Earth apart whenever/if it got close.


Quote

You missed out sooo much information in between...I personally think people need to read these things and think about things with an open mind otherwise you will never understand things and you will interpret them wrong because you might think it is rediculous to start with...Everything you said didnt even begin to sum it up it just basically touched on the events but you forgot sooo much information in between so describing it the way you did and missing all of the vital points in between makes it seem as though it is rediculous...And why could it all be impossible you know these ancient civilisations namely the Sumerians, knew soooo much and were soooo advanced and apparently they were primative and not only that but its just like Jesus...People claim they saw this man Jesus heal and all the rest of it and then they all wrote down in this book about everything he said n all the rest of it and yet people believe there was a man called jesus(im not argueing that he wasnt real)and believe in everything he did yet these ancient people say that they saw these aliens and know what happened and they wrote it all down in their language and no one today believes it and why? because it happened too long ago and it seems too far out(to people on earth at this time) to even comprehend or understand because we are told every single day that god made us and we come from Adam and Eve and all the rest of the hoohaaa


Nope. I've actually read most of his books. I defy you to say my description doesn't accurately portray what he suggests. If I make it seem ridiculous, that's because it IS ridiculous and takes a level of credulity and/or naiveté that borders on deliberate refusal of facts. Speaking of which, I have this nifty bridge right down the street I can sell you for a most reasonable price...

--Jaylemurph
"... amongst the most obstinate of our opinions may be classed those which derive from discussions in which we affect to search for the truth, while in reality we are only fortifying prejudice." -- James Fenimore Cooper, The Pathfinder

Posted Image

Deeply venial

#23 User is offline   greggK 


  • Poltergeist
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,312
  • Joined: 14-January 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:alabama, USA

Posted 13 March 2007 - 06:47 PM

Quote

I just wanted to know who here agrees with it and why


I believe his theories are useful in the determination of the events that led up to the formation of this earth. I don't know that you can pinpoint the exact planetary alignments or formations by using the Sumerian tablets. You can use his references and view the entire solar system as one planet of whatever content it was by the existence of the differing asteroid belts in our solar system. And you can use his idea of a planetary collision, but I multiply the collisions to 4 or 5 separate events. Now, the planet they call planet X or Niburu may or may not be but there are many other ancient writers that share the same idea, but say the planet was destroyed. And we, our own selves, have witnessed the changing of the trajectory of comets by nuclear satellites, much like China has just done with the satellite. We really have no worries about any planet colliding with earth anytime soon, though. It has already happened several times before and just recently, I say recently, it was around 1975-85 that there was witnessed a comet the size of a couple of football fields breaking up over Turkey. If there is planned or in the making another species eliminating event, we just do not have to worry about it. We won't even know what hit us unless we turn on the TV and watch.

#24 User is offline   greggK 


  • Poltergeist
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,312
  • Joined: 14-January 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:alabama, USA

Posted 13 March 2007 - 07:17 PM

Quote

Going more in-depth.

Assuming that Nibiru could support life, it has to be solid. Coupling that with it's larger than Jupiter size, it couldn't even exist in the Oort cloud without altering the trajectory of Earth, so claiming that such a body could reach the inner solar-system without completely ripping Earth apart is beyond me.

Also, all I've seen Sitchen successfully do is get rich off of people uneducated in the required fields of study to understand how ludicrous the idea is.



That's assuming that there is only 1 way that life could exist. This solar system is the same as any star that you see in the night sky. And there are twin stars. This solar system at one time may have been one giant gas planet with a twin. And somebody said that the revolution of the planet Niburu in relation to this solar system is how many years? Niburu may have collided with another planet long time ago and we have been waiting all this time, all of these ages and eons for it to return while our existence gets smaller and smaller. And we just rely on stories of good times when the gods could fly . . .

#25 User is offline   Leonardo 


  • Awake
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 6,640
  • Joined: 20-October 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

  • Hell is a guilty conscience

Posted 13 March 2007 - 08:09 PM

Ok, he proposes the Anunnaki were advanced enough to prevent the planet freezing on it's lengthy journey far away from the sun. So they were able to maintain 'Goldilock Zone' conditions.

Sounds good except how did they get that advanced in the first place? They presumably evolved during which time they wouldn't have had the technology to keep themselves from freezing to death wacko.gif

Or were they 'created' super smart?

Having read the site I can say I do not subscribe to his fantasy.
In the book of life, the answers aren't in the back. - Charlie Brown

"It is a profound and necessary truth that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them." - J. Robert Oppenheimer; Scientific Director; The Manhattan Project

"talking bullsh*t is not a victimless crime" - Marina Hyde, author.

#26 User is offline   fantazum 


  • Paranormal Investigator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 871
  • Joined: 25-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:wales

Posted 14 March 2007 - 12:57 AM

Quote

Wikipedia

No, I don't believe his theory at all. It's completely idiotic.


why is it that "they" are always looking for gold?...

#27 User is offline   jaylemurph 


  • Scientician!
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 7,286
  • Joined: 02-November 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY

  • "Your doubt doesn't matter a jot, sunshine."
    Emma Acid

Posted 14 March 2007 - 01:07 AM

...maybe the Cybermen were invading? Makes about as much sense as "to save their atmosphere".

--Jaylemurph


"... amongst the most obstinate of our opinions may be classed those which derive from discussions in which we affect to search for the truth, while in reality we are only fortifying prejudice." -- James Fenimore Cooper, The Pathfinder

Posted Image

Deeply venial

#28 User is offline   greggK 


  • Poltergeist
  • Icon
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,312
  • Joined: 14-January 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:alabama, USA

Posted 14 March 2007 - 02:42 AM

Quote

Ok, he proposes the Anunnaki were advanced enough to prevent the planet freezing on it's lengthy journey far away from the sun. So they were able to maintain 'Goldilock Zone' conditions.

Sounds good except how did they get that advanced in the first place? They presumably evolved during which time they wouldn't have had the technology to keep themselves from freezing to death wacko.gif

Or were they 'created' super smart?

Having read the site I can say I do not subscribe to his fantasy.


That gets into the concept of gas planets and water canopies. It would take any species that evolved from lower to upper intlligence such a long period of time to reach the point of using technology that the reason they needed the technology would consume them because you cannot rise above your environment.

#29 User is offline   isis-999 


  • Goddess Of Darkness and Desire
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 5,256
  • Joined: 22-April 05
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Deep South

  • The Bestowed Eye's of my God, Eye's of my past, lover of my future.. A Thousand's lifes all to live this One...The Steel Circle,

Posted 14 March 2007 - 10:25 AM

Everyone has the right to believe as they wish....But i have to say i think i'd find something or someone better then Sitchen's to follow or believe....
Posted Image
THE BESTOWED EYE'S OF MY GOD... GODDESS OF DESIRE....paranormalborder.com
Ask about our Vampire Club
Sig By: Arsenik...... My Favorite vampire!!

#30 User is offline   Essan 


  • Recruitment Agent for the 'B' Ark
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Posts: 2,068
  • Joined: 18-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The other side

  • Stop Climate Change: Plant a Rain Forest Today!

Posted 14 March 2007 - 11:23 AM

Quote

thats a waste of a post. well empty barrels an all that.
so where is your evidence that stitchens theory is nil. he quoted a few scriptures and agencys NASA stc, so you show me your evidence.


You want me to provide evidence that Sitchen doesn't have any evidence? rolleyes.gif

How about you (or anyone else) find one single piece of independent evidence which collaborates the theory that a planet 4 times the size of the earth orbits the sun on a 3,600 year eliptical orbit, is inhabited, that those inhabitants came down to earth, built the pyramids as navigational beacons, genetically altered archaic humans, used them to mine gold, had a big nuclear war, and then left a few thousand years ago .....
Andy

Weather & Earth Science News
The independent climate blog

  • 38 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • »
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • You cannot start a new topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users