Whenever someone like the above comes along, I cringe. It is not logical to hold such 12th century notions, yet so many people do. It is much like the ones found in the UFO field who spout garbage as fact, with no proof or even logic on their side. When someone like this posts a long convoluted diatribe to prove the existence of a particular aspect of some deity, it makes those of us who hold a more logical opinion want to hide.
I express this only in case I should one day make reference to something viewers might think bordered on a belief in a higher power. And so that those here will not be automatically turning a deaf ear to people in their daily life who might mention a belief of their own.
Some people try, as above, to define creation into the time frame that their minds can handle. They do not succeed in limiting the greatness of the universe, they only show the size of their own minds in the effort.
That's all fine, but there are three threads going under spirituality and skeptacism to debate creation verses evolution. I don't know how this became a debate about evolution verses creation. I just pointed out that he got some scientific principles wrong. I believe in creation myself, but I don't like it when creationists misstate scientific priniciples.
What do you think of the websites he linked to? Do you think it is possible that humans and dinosaurs could have coexisted?