[bee]

Well...you are a bit of a one (off).....my brain is a bit mushed up after reading YOUR thread.....but what springs to my over stimulated brain is that I just don't buy all

this heavy, heaving and lifting and rolling and heaving and levering and heaving and rolling and........

Somewhere in your avalanche of theory and amusing self love, Crystal Sage said she prefered the concrete theory....and added a quote about analysis of the mineral content of pyramid 'stones not matching the raw material in the quarries.

My present theory of how the pyramids 'might' have been built is this.....rubble could have been put into the required contained shape....using a wooden frame or something similar. In situ. Then melted. Don't know if you've come across 'Browns Gas'....there is a lot about it on the internet. Anyway Browns Gas can melt rock. So maybe, instead of humping flipping huge blocks of solid rock....who-ever built the pyramids might have melted rubble in the required position?

Browns Gas (named after the man who discovered/re-discovered it) is about recombining oxygen and hydrogen into water, and the energy released reaches temperatures high enough to melt rock.

What do you think about my 'rubble' theory? You don't HAVE to respond....but if you do...bring it on!

[Marchimedes]

I think you all are ready for this now...



it's how it's gotta be. In the presence of excellence and all you know.

[Marchimedes]

Quote

Well...you are a bit of a one (off).....

Remember a post or two ago when i said the rules are different for me and I'll prove it?

there ya go, fine for you guys to insult me (I love it) but not the other way. Fish in a barrel people, dance puppets.

Quote

my brain is a bit mushed up after reading YOUR thread.....

And this is the simple version.

Quote

but what springs to my over stimulated brain is that I just don't buy all

this heavy, heaving and lifting and rolling and heaving and levering and heaving and rolling and........

Then tell me how it's wrong and/or show me sumpin better.

Quote

Somewhere in your avalanche of theory and amusing self love,

thank you...

Quote

Crystal Sage said she prefered the concrete theory....and added a quote about analysis of the mineral content of pyramid 'stones not matching the raw material in the quarries.

Garbage that has no place on this thread. yea, lemme help with the lab anylisis and I'll buy that.

My present theory of how the pyramids 'might' have been built is this.....rubble could have been put into the required contained shape....using a wooden frame or something similar. In situ. Then melted. Don't know if you've come across 'Browns Gas'....there is a lot about it on the internet. Anyway Browns Gas can melt rock. So maybe, instead of humping flipping huge blocks of solid rock....who-ever built the pyramids might have melted rubble in the required position?

Garbage. Then all the blocks would have the same shape, that of the form you speak of.

[lisaterry]

Quote

Remember a post or two ago when i said the rules are different for me and I'll prove it?

there ya go, fine for you guys to insult me (I love it) but not the other way. Fish in a barrel people, dance puppets.
And this is the simple version.
Then tell me how it's wrong and/or show me sumpin better.

thank you...
Garbage that has no place on this thread. yea, lemme help with the lab anylisis and I'll buy that.

Garbage. Then all the blocks would have the same shape, that of the form you speak of.

hmmm... interesting. out of curiosity why would you not just dig out the pyramid instead of building it? it takes less effort to dig than to move those dam blocks dont you think? i mean if you dig down in steps sort of like what you illustrated and then formed the steps into blocks in place where they were you could build a good base for the pyramid and not have to build it up so far from the ground to make it. then it would be larger in actual size than it would look.

[bee]

Quote

[there ya go, fine for you guys to insult me (I love it) but not the other way. Fish in a barrel people, dance puppets.

Hate to disappoint you, but saying someone is a 'one off' is complimentary!

Quote

Then tell me how it's wrong and/or show me sumpin better.

Melting rubble...in situ.

Quote

Garbage that has no place on this thread. yea, lemme help with the lab anylisis and I'll buy that.

But it IS on the thread....and if it's correct, then the solid block theory comes under the spotlight.

Quote

Garbage. Then all the blocks would have the same shape, that of the form you speak of.

The blocks would have what-ever shape the 'frame' created....the same, or not the same.

But hey.....don't want to rain on your parade.....like them or hate them...your posts are pure ART.

[Themis]

I would like to see your emails to Dr Richards (who incidentally works at the University of York in the UK) - He is a specialist in British Historic archaeology rather than egyptology but I'm sure he did a couple of terms on egypt for his degree.

It may be better to approach an Egyptologist? Or alternatively write a book. That way your theory gets known and you make a living out of it?

Spelling as bait? Well its an original method certainly.

What does 'I drop sledges mean'?

This post has been edited by Themis: 09 May 2007 - 07:00 AM

[venusram]

Wrong question, not how but why? that's was the real puzzle.

[Marchimedes]

A mans gotta do what a mans gotta do!

[Irish]

Quote

Remember a post or two ago when i said the rules are different for me and I'll prove it?

Rules are the same here for YOU as everyone else. We don’t make rules based on the size of one ego.
Now pay attention Teacher, rules broken in your first post of the day;

4. No racism, threats, personal attacks, harassment or hate related posts

5. No posting private messages in the forum
Please keep private messages private, no copying and pasting private messages in to forum threads.

6. No flaming, flame baiting, mocking, verbal abuse or trolling.

Now the line was infringed upon when you decided to share your private messages with people who are here to read your theory not your love/hate mail.

Please keep in mind the following

9. Use proper forum etiquette when posting Please try not to do any of the following as these will draw negative attention and annoy other users:
• Don't write your posts or topic titles in all capital letters
• Don't quote huge amounts of text from previous posts just so you can add one line in response
• Avoid posting enormous pictures that distort the page so users have to scroll horizontally
• Always post topics in the forum section pertaining to the subject being discussed

As I mentioned earlier you are NOT exempt from the rules. So this post will serve as a friendly reminder. Further violations of the well posted rules (I recommend you read them) will result in first a suspension of your posting privileges here right up to an outright ban. I am sure this does not worry you as I am sure it happens all the time to you.
You have an interesting theory and it would be a shame to have to visit you in your lonely site to read them because you were unable to play nice while visiting ours.

Thank you for your understanding.

Irish

This post has been edited by Irish: 09 May 2007 - 08:16 PM

[Themis]

Fair point on my spelling. I will ensure all posts back to you in future have been thoroughly checked!

You lost me with the rest since I didn't PM you and I fail to see the relevance of your remarks!

and by the way...

I'm a female...

This post has been edited by Themis: 09 May 2007 - 08:32 PM

[Fluffybunny]

I tried to be fairly straightforward in my request for you to tone it down and stop with the snarky responses... you don't seem to be capable of that. You have an interesting topic but you have been so uncivil and rude that there is no way that you are going to be able to contribute in a manner that is in line with the rules of the forum that you agreed to when you became a member.

I am going to give you 3 days off and hopefully enough time to reflect on whether or not you wish to contribute to this forum in a positive manner or not at all (I have pretty good idea, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt).

I am also going to close this thread; as you will not be able to respond and no doubt people will continue to reply to you in a fashion that (while deserving) is equally against forum rules.

Perhaps there is a forum out there that accepts your kind of rude and uncivil behaviour, but this isn't one of them, and you have no one to blame but yourself for your time off and potential ban should you not learn to treat others with repsect.