http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americ...sp?story=417787

Now Bush blames failure to find WMD on looters

Although im not anti-bush or anti-government (neutral) this excuse is a little hard to swallow if you ask me.

I agree bounty_hunter.
If there were stockpiles of WMD, one would think they would be in multiple locations. If they were in multiple locations, I would find it difficult to believe they were all looted, and even that they were all in Baghdad where most of the looting was.
I think it's too early for excuses. It has only been a short while since the end of the war, and there is so much information that is still surfacing almost on a daily basis. If in 6 to 9 months after the war, and no verifiable WMD have been located, then that would indicate a huge intelligence failure.
If there were WMD, some of them could have been looted, some of them could have been detroyed by the Baath party, and some could have been relocated to underground sites or even out of the country.
But to give excuses at this time is a mistake, and discredits Bush and his administration.

In my humble opinion

I am not going to get into the whole WMD and Bush administration thing .
Cause we all no what happens if we do . I just wanted to say that the Newzealand Herald is running a front page story claiming that the American Millitary are running DNA tests on 2 bodies they believe to be Saddam Hussien and one of his son's .