http://marcusthebronco.blogspot.com/2002/1...t-liberals.html

I feel dumber for having read that. I don't even know where to begin...



And you listen to this bombastic imbecile?

I think there is some truth to the article.

*backs away slowly from this thread*

Nothing one reads or hears can truly ever be 100% accurate but there is enough truth in this article to post it. It is remarkably similar to many poster seen on this very site and their posting styles comments etc.

There was very little actual truth in that. Just the same shrill Clinton - bashing these blowhards seem to favor nowadays. Last I checked, the Clinton administration's been over for nearly six years now. Shut up, already.

Or so crying about 2000 election 5 years later is ok! that post falls right into line with article!

I haven't heard anyone say anything about the 2000 election. Do you have anything to say even remotely relevant to what's going on in 2005?

Actually I am surprised by your attacks. The article is timeless in its point so that does qualify it for 2005. The replies fall right into claim article makes. NOTHING is 100% correct I said that. I have however reframed from asking my fellow UM members to "shutup" or calling ones imbeciles!

Did I call you an imbecile? Reread my post. I called Marcus the Blowhard an imbecile. By posting this article you are directly attacking liberals, which includes me, and many of our other fellow UM members. If you didn't want people to post their thoughts, you ought not have posted that in the first place.

*walks away*

Just fighting fire with fire

This article was too poorly though out and written to even cause heated emotions.

For example, if Mr. Traveling Salesman had ever taken an effective communication course he would understand that his 1.) The Rules of Emotion is a non-threatening way to express ones own view. Despite arguments to the contrary, everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion and Ms. Boxer is allowed to express hers. She isn't saying that her mind is made up by a "feeling", she is stating her OPINION, not a FACT, and wording it as such.

AS I said before:

EDIT: damn spelling errors

Sigh. But it was fun while it lasted. And I got to use the words bombastic imbecile in a sentence.

Emotional replies and namecalling usually (not always) shows signs that arguement is lost and reply is out of disgust over lost arguement

I don't think Snuffy was directing the comments towards you, Panther. More to the author of the piece.

Who's doing what now? As I said before, do you actually have something to say, or did you post this little nugget of drivel to bash the evil, nasty liberals?

I see Saruman, and now thread will be closing in 3.....2........1......

Like I said fighting fire with fire first blood wasnt mine!

If thread is closed then the babbling liberal post (all of them) bashing and posting bizzare claims too must be closed!

What are you fighting? You posted this in the first place.

What in the name of god are you talking about?

This thread is clearly going to achieve little but attract flaming from both sides, especially as it's in the general off-topic section.

There is no reason for this to remain open.