Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Backward research goes forward
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Main Front Page News
UM-Bot
user posted image rSubmitted by Marvy: University of Washington physicist (and science-fiction author) John Cramer is moving forward with his experiment in backward causality, thanks in part to tens of thousands of dollars in contributions sent in by his fans. Although Cramer emphasizes that his lab is looking at “nonlocal quantum communication” rather than backward time travel per se, the gadgetry he’s assembling could settle a controversy surrounding a seemingly faster-than-light effect that Albert Einstein thought was downright spooky.Boiled down to its basics, the experiment involves splitting laser light into two beams, so that characteristics of one beam are reflected in the other beam as well. That's an example of what physicists call quantum entanglement. Specifically, Cramer has been planning to fiddle with one of the entangled laser beams such that it takes on the property of waves or particles. If one beam behaves like particles, the entangled photons of light in the other beam should behave like particles, too.

So what happens when the beams go their separate ways, and you conduct a wave-vs.-particle measurement on one beam? When someone else checks the other beam, the same measurement should yield the same result. In fact, you could visualize using the wave-vs.-particle toggle as a means for communicating information, sort of like Morse code. Theoretically, you could check one beam to receive a message instantaneously from whoever is fiddling with the other beam - even if you're separated from the receiver by millions of light-years.That's what Einstein considered "spooky action at a distance." Such an effect could send information faster than light beams could travel, running counter to special relativity - and thus Einstein thought the effect was impossible to achieve. However, the evidence is mounting that quantum entanglement actually happens.

linked-image View: Full Article | Source: MSNBC
Athena22
I don't think I quite understand this article, or rather, how this new knowledge/technology can be applied. From what I understand, the scientists say that they can send information light years ahead? Have we figured out a way to speak to aliens across the galaxies??
Evildooer
QUOTE(Athena22 @ Jul 22 2007, 05:10 PM) *
I don't think I quite understand this article, or rather, how this new knowledge/technology can be applied. From what I understand, the scientists say that they can send information light years ahead? Have we figured out a way to speak to aliens across the galaxies??



They have had the ability to do that for many many years... It's just that now it doesn't have to be face to face talks with said Aliens.... Now they can send a light beam that will carry the info back, and forth.

Call it an intergalactic At&t line...
uth
I'm no expert in Quantum mechanics, but ever since I've known about the Quantum Entanglement effect, being a hacker, I always envisioned using it as a means to send/receive information. I've been told by people who claim to know better that it's not possible to do that. Good to know that maybe I wasn't so wrong after all tongue.gif
uth
QUOTE
If Cramer detected that effect, the findings would raise the kinds of paradoxes you might see in science-fiction novels or "The Twilight Zone." What if you detected a signal from the future, but then decided not to send the signal? (That's called the "bilking paradox"). What if you received the text of a best-selling manuscript from yourself in the future, had it published, then saved a copy so you could send it to yourself in the past? (Cramer calls that the "immaculate conception paradox.")


Nice theory, but this experiment relies on sending one beam a long distance and another a short distance. How far can we realistically send the long beam? It seems to me that even if this experiment works, the information could only be send fractions of a second to a second in the past. Hardly enough time to telegraph tonights winning lotto numbers to yourself and play them.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.