okay, first off let me asy a bit in general. im a teenager. i live in an small-town-and-country area. youth culture here is fairly laid back, and not at all extreme. the girls here are not all super-skinny (buth then, we ARE the most obese state in the nation) and, since its people here are primarily roman-catholic, the girls are very (dare i say
annoyingly) chaste. when the hurricanes rita and katrina hit new orleans, however, we had a tremendous influx of people - and for about a year and a half, there were quite a few teenagers around here that were into 'extreme' emo, gothic and gangster-rapper culture. theyve sort of mellowed out, it seems (or else moved away) because they arent turning heads anymore. but it made me think about how different things are in the big cities like new orleans, as compared to small towns.
second, this:
QUOTE
But from my experiences with Popculture today, it really isn't that hard. Actually, I think that it has changed just in the last three years or so.
Before then, there was alot of pressure to fit in exactly. But now, with the rise of bands such as Fallout Boy and Panic! ATD, I feel that there is alot more freedom in terms of what is acceptable. Just look at the rise of the "emo" subculture. Sure, this may be considered a weaker form of a punk or goth momevent, but the fact is that it is making large ammounts of kids change from being rather straighedge, to being ... different. Infact, as far as I can see, the entire movement is about trying to be different from everyone else.Times are changing, and I find that people have alot more personal freedom. If you dress differently, so long as you subscribe to things such as clean clothes and personal hygiene, the most people will think is "Oh look at them, they are being individual!
Which I think is really my point. People are moving towards a much more individual based fashion sense, rather than conforming to a set of standards.
i never exactly fit in myself (a banjo playing teenager, right?) but this has always been my thoughts on the 'alternative' groups like goths, emos and punks:
they may be fiercly individualistic in comparison to, say, preppies, but are they really very individualistic when theyre conforming so tightly to other goths, emos and punks? most of the time, no. these groups are possessed by the herd instinct just as much as preppies: instead of flip-flops, torn jeans and baseball caps, its black jeans, studded belts or pentacle jewlery. do you ever see a goth in company with a group of hippies? no, of course not - you usually see groups of people that are clearly goths, or punks, or emos. you recognize them as such because they all have a distinctive look - and very often, the boy punks all look alike and the girl punks all look alike. they form mindless herds just as badly as the preppies, whose example they hate so much. they all try so comically to be 'different' from everybody else, but end up all being the same. so I've found that punks, goths and emos are, mostly, individualistic only as a group; individually, they arent very individualistic at all.