Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: WRONG fish used to save species!
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Science > Natural World
Pandora2173
After reading the article below I only had one question........

How come in 20 years, not one single scientist/biologist/expert ever stepped out on a limb to say, "Ummmm, these fish we're stocking don't actually have green backs." huh.gif dontgetit.gif hmm.gif unsure.gif


DENVER - A 20-year government effort to restore the population of an endangered native trout in Colorado has made little progress because biologists have been stocking some of the waterways with the wrong fish, a new study says.

Advances in genetic testing helped biologist discover the error, which was called a potential black eye, but they said there is still hope for restoring the greenback cutthroat trout.

The three-year study, led by University of Colorado researchers and published online in Molecular Ecology on Aug. 28, said that five of the nine populations believed to be descendants of the endangered trout were actually the more common Colorado River cutthroat trout, which look similar.

The study said the results imply that the effort has "failed to improve the species' status."

Lead author, Jessica Metcalf, who recently completed her doctorate in ecology and evolutionary biology at the university, was optimistic about the ongoing restoration program because four populations have been identified as "pure greenback cutthroat trout."

Bruce Rosenlund of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which is leading the recovery effort, said the agency is reviewing the study.

"The report is just a continuation of different expert input provided to the team for consideration for restoration," Rosenlund said.

Colorado and federal biologists have a goal of 20 self-sustaining populations of at least 500 fish each. The cost of the program was not available.

Greenback cutthroat trout were historically found in the drainages of the Arkansas and South Platte rivers in Colorado and a small part of Wyoming. They were declared extinct in 1937 because of overfishing, pollution from mines and competition from nonnative fish.

Researchers said remnant populations were found in the 1950s in tributaries and provided brood stock for fish raised in federal and state hatcheries and released in their native habitat.

The fish was added to the federal endangered species list in 1978.

The greenback were believed to be in 142 miles of waterways, including in Rocky Mountain National Park, Rosenlund said.

The new study, based DNA test results, found the greenback cutthroat trout's range is only 11 miles of streams.

The research results are a setback but state biologists believe the program will succeed over the long term, said Tyler Baskfield, Colorado Division of Wildlife spokesman.

"We've been moving fish around in the state since the late 1800s, and now the new science comes in and all of a sudden it's a different playing field," Baskfield said.

University of Colorado professor Andrew Martin, the study's principal investigator, said that while the findings might give the recovery program a "black eye," the hope is that biologists and agencies will move ahead on recovering the species before it goes extinct.


linked-image
Jack_of_Blades
It's sad when the only people willing to save our animals
cant get it right.....
Legatus Legionis
poor ye'
hope that they'll get back on the right track soon.
rosenrot
I hope to be doing this kinda work when I graduate college. And you guys have my full permission to smack me if I ever do anything this stupid. Poor fishies no.gif
ships-cat
US park officials and game/wildlife officials do NOT have a good record at wildlife management sad.gif

Meow Purr.
Star_girl
Opps....?

That is just sad that noone picked up the error until now! At least we know she is human...
camlax
QUOTE(ships-cat @ Sep 10 2007, 12:01 PM) *
US park officials and game/wildlife officials do NOT have a good record at wildlife management sad.gif

Meow Purr.



Its terrible! Read the history of Yellowstone. (Actually these blundering mistakes are not really limited to the US).

I think the part that is bad is that they were introducing the fish all over the state with no idea of its actual natural habitat. This is how we get in these messes in the first place....

Introduced species, kills off native ones....
rosenrot
QUOTE(camlax @ Sep 11 2007, 09:33 AM) *
I think the part that is bad is that they were introducing the fish all over the state with no idea of its actual natural habitat. This is how we get in these messes in the first place....

I completely agree. Look at carp. They're everywhere. And it's become even a bigger problem with the aquarium trade growing as it is. People buy a fish and don't realize how large it will get, and when it gets to be too large for the current tank, they toss it in the local river. Piranha are a huge problem in Florida because, unlike in New York, they can survive the winter and reproduce.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.