Most people wouldn't agree with that statement, but let me give an example..
You are religious. You believe that there is an almighty God governing the universe with absolute power over it.
One day, your throat begins to hurt. The neck starts swelling up, it becomes painful to swallow. You are quite sure you've come down with strep throat.
What do you do?
A) Pray to your God, and trust that he will heal it for you.
Almost everyone on the earth, religious or not, will choose option B. Why? Because they know that when they get sick, the place to go is the doctor's office, where they can be healed and reap the benefits of scientific progress. They've done it before, so it becomes reliable and they place trust in their local clinic.
Now, I don't know about every religion, but at least Christianity says that if Christians have faith in God, he will provide for them, as we can read in their Bible:
QUOTE
Matt. 6:25-34 - "do not be anxious for your life, what you shall eat, or what you shall drink; nor for your body, what you shall put on. ...men of little faith. Do not be anxious...for your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things..."
And I would assume that most other religions say these types of things as well.
So then why? Why don't these religious people simply pray when they are sick, and trust that their God will provide as their religion says he will? Well, it's simple, religious people have learned that prayer will not work for them in those situations. If you just pray to your God when you get strep throat, it will develop and give you a plethera of conditions, possibly even death. Once again, religious people have more faith in the products of science than they do in their God, because Science has firmly established the fact that it works, and works well for that matter. With proper antibiotics, you won't even feel that strep throat within 1-2 days.
The only possible answer I could imagine from a religious standpoint would be that God inspired this scientific progress. But that springs up new questions, namely: Why didn't he do it sooner, so less people died or suffered prematurely? Why did he use the same process to inspire these medicines, as is used to contradict the many religions and the very idea of Creationism, with theories like the big bang and abiogenesis? Modern medicine is obviously the sole work of mankind.
