QUOTE(Irish @ Oct 2 2007, 08:58 PM)

If one asks a question it is only polite to answer that question even if your answer is biased. An example would be, you wish to take a good holiday over seas and you want to know were I would choose to go. Now from my own personal experience I might recommend Mexico because every time I have gone there I have had a fantastic time in the sun and the surf. But someone else experience might counter my own. i.e. he was mugged got sun burnt and his wife ran of with a local gigolo , I would never be able to convince him it’s a great place to visit and every time he over heard me speaking of Mexico as such a great destination his natural response is to jump in and share his side.
Irish
I just loved this bit in your posting Irish

A good example of experiences the different sides of the same coin.
QUOTE(northwest @ Oct 2 2007, 10:19 PM)

Actually that was not my point.
My point was, within religious frame, the correct metaphor for unbelievers would be: people who see yet rush to danger willingly, and not blind people rushing into danger. They CHOSE to go there.
If one decides to go to hell, why not let him?
If someone decides to go to hell, it is natural that others would try to stop them. However, and this is a big "However", who can really say, 100% that the person rushing in blindly to what
appears to be hell, is actually Hell at all - we could be wrong and the person concerned could be correct for all we know.
Many years ago, I was bible-bashed by a born-again Christian, he was totally convinced that I was heading for hell, he wouldn't let up. The end result was that rather than turn me towards Religion, he shaved off any residue of desire that I may have had to go to Church and practice religion - so much so, that I never have and never will place myself in a "religious catagory" of any sort - lest I end up like him

(I can laugh about it now, however at the time, it was like going through the Dark Night of the Soul!)