QUOTE (Lion of Judah @ Oct 18 2007, 11:00 AM)

Before the end of the last Ice Age (12,000-years ago) the ocean levels were at least 300 feet below their current levels.
Got a source on that, particularly for Bimini?
QUOTE (Lion of Judah @ Oct 18 2007, 11:00 AM)

A vast “island” was in the area in those remote times rather than chains of islands. Edgar Cayce referred to Bimini as one of the mountaintops of ancient Atlantis. While few would consider the island a mountain, 12,000-years ago it was one of the highest points on the vast land formation in the region. Bimini and Andros Island, lying about 100 miles to the east of Bimini, were a part of the same island in 10,000 B.C.—called "Poseidia" by Cayce. Cayce related that a Hall of Records containing the records of Atlantis was constructed somewhere in the region.
This contradicts what I've found on this, that is that the island of Bimini was actually underwater 10,000 years ago. Maybe I misremember, but I actually
have looked into this Bimini nonsense for myself.
QUOTE (Lion of Judah @ Oct 18 2007, 11:00 AM)

Archaeologists have countered that the remains of civilization in the region only go back 7,000 years—or perhaps even less. They have asserted that if a major civilization existed in the area, some of its remains would be found on current land. That assertion has a fundamental flaw. Ancient maritime civilizations typically built their cities and ports on the ocean shores.
The Sumerians were a maritime civilization. As were the Egyptians, the Phoenecians, the Greeks, the Perisans, the Romans, the Celts.
Yet we find
their ruins do we not?
QUOTE (Lion of Judah @ Oct 18 2007, 11:00 AM)

As related in prior issues of Ancient Mysteries, archaeologists working in South America, the Pacific coast of North America, India, and elsewhere in the world have been discovering the remains of underwater ruins. These ancient maritime civilizations built their cities and ports on coastlines—all of which have been covered by the rising oceans.
Got any references on this? I know for a fact that the submerged ruins in India were
not "covered by the rising oceans." These ruins sank due to their unfortunate placement in a tectonic subduction zone. IOW, they sank, the ocean didn't rise.
QUOTE (Lion of Judah @ Oct 18 2007, 11:00 AM)

Given the recent changes in North and South American archaeology—taking the history of habitation in the Americas to 50,000-years ago—it seems likely that ruins would lie in the shallow waters around Bimini.
These "changes in North and South American archaeology—taking the history of habitation in the Americas to 50,000-years ago" have yet to occur, you must be dreaming.
It may be that in the future this could happen, but it hasn't happened yet.
QUOTE (coredrill @ Oct 17 2007, 12:41 PM)

as you yourself said, its all lies in evidence..not the proof....the thread itself is the evidence unless US govt Agents (hmmm quite a few in here) force the Mods to delete or close the thread!!
Coredrill,
Good Answer!!
Harte