What a plie of nonsense that is. It is full of idiotic accusations such as :
QUOTE
At this point, amateur astronomers on Web discussion boards began crying foul and were accusing NASA of image tampering.
Which amateur astronomers? What web discussion boards? It doesn't say, now why can that be?
Again he says,
QUOTE
For amateur astronomers, this was the smoking gun they had been looking for
again no names, no links.
I have spent a large portion of my life reading astronomical magazines and following events on astronomical websites. I have never seen any such claims on any site except conspiracy sites (and then only on the real way out ones).
The fact is that this is a very old and very debunked piece of nonsense. The respected website Space.com debunked tnis silliness back in 2003:
HERE.
The fact is that NEAT brightened and, in 2004, was photographed by thousands of amateur astronomers EXACTLY WHERE IT SHOULD BE.
There was nothing special about NEAT, it was not the have
QUOTE
a planet sized core up to the size of Mercury.
as the fool that wrote this garbage claimed.
Indeed the fool claims that the comet had broken up and fragmented:
QUOTE
The cometary debris which NASA claims is associated with the comet Bradfield, is in most likelihood, the first physical manifestation of the comet NEAT's break up and/or changed flight pattern.
If this is true then it is an amazing coincidence that there was a comet in exactly the correct orbit at exactly the correct time as that which was predicted for NEAT before its orbit was changed and it broke up.which was photographed by astronomers all over the world.
According to NASA flight projections, the comet would flyby the sun and continue its orbit without having an appreciable impact on either the sun or the Earth. Real time photographs of the comet by the SOHO satellite positioned between the Sun and Earth showed the comet's passage around the sun (for NASA's projected passage, see image on left). As predicted, the comet appeared very large, with some estimates of its coma (gases, ice, etc., surrounding the core) up to four times the size of Jupiter while having a planet sized core up to the size of Mercury. 
