For almost 75 years, astronomers have believed that the Universe has a large amount of unseen or ‘dark’ matter, thought to make up about five-sixths of the matter in the cosmos. With the conventional theory of gravitation, based on Newton’s ideas and refined by Einstein 92 years ago, dark matter helps to explain the motion of galaxies, and clusters of galaxies, on the largest scales. Now two Canadian researchers at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics suggest that the motion of galaxies in a distant cluster is more easily explained by a Modified Gravity (MOG) theory than by the presence of dark matter. Graduate student Joel Brownstein and his supervisor Professor John Moffat of the University of Waterloo present their results in a paper in the 21 November edition of Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. The two scientists analysed images of the ‘Bullet Cluster’ of galaxies made using the Hubble Space Telescope, Chandra X-ray and Spitzer infrared observatories and the Magellan telescope in Chile. The Bullet Cluster consists of two merging clusters of galaxies and lies at a distance of over 3 billion light years in the direction of the southern constellation of Carina. This arsenal of instrumentation gave them maps of the 150 million degree hot gas between the galaxies and show the effect of gravitational lensing, where the gravity of an intervening object – here the Bullet Cluster - deflects the path of light emitted by a more distant galaxy. Previous studies suggested that the Bullet Cluster clearly demonstrates the presence of dark matter.

But when Brownstein and Moffat compared the observed gravitational lensing and distribution of gas with that predicted using MOG theory, they found no evidence for this. In other words, it is more natural to explain the appearance of this cluster using a revised theory of gravitation than by including dark matter. MOG theory emerges from a generalization of relativity that eluded even Einstein, has been developed by Moffat for nearly thirty years and is now yielding astronomical and cosmological results.

View: Full Article | Source: PhysOrg.com

Oh GREAT.

Thank you SO much Saruman.

I finally manage to get past page 27 of Hawkins' "Brief History of Time", and start to get my head around Gravitron particles, and now I've got to throw it all away and start again with MOG.
(hmm... new acronym.. "MOdified Gravity Invalidates Everything.... 'MOGIE').

Why do I bother trying to improve myself ?

<wandesr off muttering back to cave to bang some rocks together>

Meow Purr.

So next week they will uncover that MOG is just a modified form of nothing, recognizing that motion is not really motion, but rather a lack of synchronized phase displacements.

So next week they will uncover that MOG is just a modified form of nothing, recognizing that motion is not really motion, but rather a lack of synchronized phase displacements.

So next week they will uncover that MOG is just a modified form of nothing, recognizing that motion is not really motion, but rather a lack of synchronized phase displacements.

so why does this keep happening