QUOTE (phantomcgill @ Nov 5 2007, 09:28 PM)

i dont mean to bash anyone's religion or anything, but my roommate is a hardcore christian, so he gets me thinking about christianity a lot. here's one thing that really bugs me about it. it's just something i think, so please dont take offense.
God created all things, right? including humans? so, god created us. that means he created our bodies. our bodies tell us to do things that would be considered "sinful" like having sex or getting revenge.
That means god also created our brains, which tell us that these things are perfectly normal. God hard-wired us to do all these bad things. So how can he punish us for doing something he designed us to do? shouldnt it all be his fault?
that would be like a person building a car, and then getting mad and destroying the car because it ran well.
If god really wanted us to not have sex or whatever, then he shouldnt have made us that way.
you might say, "well, he made us that way so we would be tempted and we would resist the temptation, thus bringing us closer to god. it's all about our freedom of choice". well, who is the one that put temptation into our hearts? satan. who created satan? god. god created satan to be the way he is, so god is responsible for all the evil in the world.
I'm sorry, but god just does not seem like someone who deserves my praise.
Trust me, I can really understand your feelings on this.
Also having read through all the replies here, I commend some of the thoughtful inteligent theological answers. I agree, if I believed this way, that we were given 'stuff' to survive on, and then given the will and the power to temper it, as we civilized. I say kudos on that one.
In a nutshell on the sex thing, and from my belief, I think it's a foregone conclusion, from my standpoint, that sex is to perpuate the species. Yes, it's a strong drive, so my quess if it wasn't there, we would probably need a beer or two, or a scotch on the rocks to actually get through some 'obligations' to keep us going. I think your questions would also fall under the 'what about the rest of the animal kingdom?' question. They have the strong sex drive to keep their species going, and then some. You know, with the male trying to 'knock boots' with any female he conquers. So, do they have the same rules, or how are we different, and why are we given these rules? Maybe it's because that we were also given that free will as a gift, and that the gift of sex and the gift of free will kind of not mix with each other, and thus given those rules.
THough, to agree with everyone, sex is not dirty. Though, I do not understand how it could be outside marriage, when every marriage is different, every wedding ceremony is different, and many different types of religious and non-religious marriages. I had a hard time, on a completely different different forum, getting a very religious person to admit my secular marriage was not valid in his eyes. I married all right, but not in a church, but in my inlaws home, to a justice of the peace. It was a wedding ceremony, and we were declared married, and still are, but to some we are not. So, am I not having the innocent sex that those who married in a church have? I had sex outside of married, and with someone before my husband. He also had previous partners too. That doesn't mean anything. I think it doesn't mean anything, if you are responsible with it. Marriage doesn't ensure responsibility, or there wouldn't be any divorces, or dysfunctional families for that matter.
I think we were organic flukes of nature, that needed sex to perpuate, and thus got the brain to help us be responsible with it. We formed what we needed, as needed through out the years.
I know, that the free will subject is always brought up, but if we're given free will to deal with what was given us, thoughout our lifetime, why, when we are not sure what happens after death. I really do not think anyone has a real definate proof of what that is, so it's kind of, sorry to say this, a waste of time to learn something for something we are not sure of.
So, in a sense, I'm with you on that thought.