QUOTE (Rhungobains @ Nov 7 2007, 01:58 AM)

Absolutely! Nothing quite like crushing he who is a threat to the good name of science by exercising hegemony.
I’m with you every step of the way, man!

No he is just telling how it is..... he is just telling the truth....Waspie is correct.
QUOTE
There are already 264 planets with no name out there, and the list grows longer weekly. Names are great but not helpful. For example a planet called Bob or Gaia would not tell you where to find that planet.
Yes I agree, names are not very beneficial at all, but woudn't they be helpful if they consisted of some kind of code, like new found moons of the gas giants, wich consist of a code that says it's date of dicovery, planet it is orbiting and......... hmmm.....here's a quick example: S/2003 J 19
Of course this is not a real name...
Well maybe the new found planets consist of a similar code and are not considered names..... but I'm not sure about that..... would like to know.