From: ANONYMOUS
Subject: MJ-12: Majority vs Majestic ... WHICH one is CORRECT?
Date: Fri, Nov 2, 2007, 4:47 p.m.
VICTOR:
I realize there have been some questions about the differences in Majority-12 Group and Majestic-12. Here is the historical explanation:
President Truman created the Majority-12 Group (MJ-12). Sometime later, several different intelligence agencies somehow made an administrative ERROR when referring to the group in a classified report. In that report, the group's name was referred to as the Majestic-12 Group. No one bothered to change the name in that document because of the extreme compartmentalization.
So, over the years the group's name -- at least up until 1965 -- was shown as TWO (2) different groups: Majority-12 Group and Majestic-12 Group. The name was changed in 1966 and then again later. There were NOT two (2) groups, just one. The ORIGINAL name was Majority-12 Group, just as the presidential briefing document stated.
The assertion by some members of the conspiracy fraternity on the forum (Open Minds Forum) that the use of the name "Majority-12" was a suggestion or hint of some type of "false flag" operation was underway is just WRONG. This is the explanation I've offered; these are the FACTS.
Onto the next question, which has been posed to me about President Carter being briefed. President Carter was NEVER FORMALLY briefed, at least [not] by our people [DIA]. INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL briefed President Carter on information INTELLIGENCE OFFICIAL already had, but was NOT on the official briefing (normally given to sitting presidents), which was authorized by an Executive Order during Truman's days. The briefing was prepared, but never given. Why? We don't know. Carter never asked for it and we never gave it to him.
President Bush (#1) already knew the story since he was Director of the CIA in 1975-76. I don't know about President Clinton nor Bush #2.
I hope that answers your question, which two of our group members relayed to me after perusing the thousands of posts on the forum which hosts the SERPO.org Web site (the Open Minds Forum).
My answers should clear up these issues. On a side note, if you wish to pen a brief history of both the DIA and ONI [Office of Naval Intelligence] you may do so, though I am not asking you to do this. However, it might be very instructive, educational and eye-opening for your huge readership as well as the thousands of forum members who might take the time to read it.
I would think the Reagan biography would have worn you out! Please bear in mind that while ONI [Office of Naval Intelligence] might be the lead agency in IAC crash/retrievals [Identified Alien Craft] and the subsequent reverse engineering of those recovered craft, ONI is overseen by the DIA and also reports to the president through his national security adviser. ALL of their reports, conclusions and analysis are filtered through us.
More to come....
http://www.serpo.org/release27a2.asp