QUOTE (Jjbreen @ Nov 11 2007, 02:54 AM)

Why do we accept the claims of "Mediums" that do 'their thing' w/the stories and pictures and reports
pre-posted?
Why is it we are told,
"that it's not done this way ...." when we ask them their medium feelings, thoughts and such w/no information provided? Why is it, "it 's not done this way..", with these people? (Yes I know, I just wanted to see the question there for 'them' to read and see just how silly it looks ... )
This is just a 'tad' bogus, right?
I mean how hard is it to give feelings and thought w/all the information there to read and see? Anyone can do that! There is no medium powers in that. My son would call that: "Master of the Obvious!"
So how is it that we can validate these people if it's not through some tests? I mean other wise we are simply to 'take their word for it' and their 'references' - "see what I did "here" and "there" - I told people I agreed w/their stories!"
I"m sorry but does anyone else see the problems w/these kinds of claims? Also why this field cannot and is not taken seriously .... ?
Again, you're making a colossal generalisation. We have established that there are many fake mediums, and if your post is directed at them, then more power to you. But there are certainly mediums aren't at all 'a tad bogus.'
Deb Webber is given a photograph of a murder victim. She does not look at the photograph. It is placed face-down before her. All this is aired on national television and the television show is legally required to supervise and watch her non-stop. She then picks up an 'energy' from the photograph, and claims that the 'spirit of the deceased' is present and proceeds to say:
1) the sex of the victim.
2) the age of the victim.
3) the former residence of the victim
4) the personality of the victim
5) the nature of the victim's death
In each of these things, she is absolutely correct. Now, there is absolutely no verifiable proof to suggest that Deb picks up an 'energy' from the photograph, nor that she communicates with the victim's spirit. But we do know this - that prior to the filming of the reading she has absolutely no idea who or what she is going to be presented with, nor has she done any research - she has given all this information on the spot.
So how did she do this? One who was still disinclined to believe in the supernatural side of things could try and claim that she guessed the information. Which is, in my opinion, ludicrous.
No wonder Deb Webber, among a small handful of other carefully selected mediums, is constantly requested to aid police in solving crimes.
I will say again: There are many, many false mediums out there, who are accurately described in Jj's post. However, there are exceptions, such as Deb Webber, described above, who simply cannot be ruled out as false. It would be close-minded and irrational to do so.
While searching for psychics to partake in the television show described above, TVNZ interviewed over 60 'psychics,' presenting them with a photograph of a victim from a remote murder case and asking them to conjure intimate details of the victim and the case. Of all 60, only two could do so. Again - the abundance of false mediums is staggering. But I have no doubt there is a fair share of real ones.