Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Most people SEVERELY overestimate NASA budget
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Science > Space and Astronomy
Alex01
Americans clueless on NASA budgets
Space: Not as expensive as you think
By Lucy Sherriff
Published Monday 19th November 2007 17:17 GMT

A recent survey, carried out on behalf of The Space Review, has revealed that the average American believes a quarter of the country's public purse goes towards funding NASA.

The survey found that most people reported the belief that NASA is almost as well funded as the military. The Department of Defense does receive roughly 21 per cent of the nation's wonga, but most people overestimated this by a further 12 per cent.

In reality, NASA gets something like 0.6 per cent of the natonal budget, a fact which researchers report came as a surprise to those being surveyed. According to The Space Review, one participant replied "No wonder we haven’t gone anywhere!".

The survey formed part of a larger analysis of the costs and benefits of having a publicly funded space agency. The writers argue that people have scant knowledge of what NASA actually does. Combined with the huge overestimates of the cost of running NASA, it is not surprising that people often regard it as being poor value for money.

Source article


Alex01: An people actually complain! tongue.gif
MID
QUOTE (Alex01 @ Nov 20 2007, 10:37 AM) *
Americans clueless on NASA budgets
Space: Not as expensive as you think
By Lucy Sherriff
Published Monday 19th November 2007 17:17 GMT

A recent survey, carried out on behalf of The Space Review, has revealed that the average American believes a quarter of the country's public purse goes towards funding NASA.

The survey found that most people reported the belief that NASA is almost as well funded as the military. The Department of Defense does receive roughly 21 per cent of the nation's wonga, but most people overestimated this by a further 12 per cent.

In reality, NASA gets something like 0.6 per cent of the natonal budget, a fact which researchers report came as a surprise to those being surveyed. According to The Space Review, one participant replied "No wonder we haven’t gone anywhere!".

The survey formed part of a larger analysis of the costs and benefits of having a publicly funded space agency. The writers argue that people have scant knowledge of what NASA actually does. Combined with the huge overestimates of the cost of running NASA, it is not surprising that people often regard it as being poor value for money.

Source article


Alex01: An people actually complain! tongue.gif



That is actually amazing (if it can be trusted as reliable information) that "most people" actually believe that NASA costs 25% of the Federal budget. It's never been a significant piece of the Federal budget, ever.

The Apollo Program, for instance, cost about 4 cents per day for every American for the duration of the program. Apollo 11 cost each American about $2.00 each.

A poor value for the money? One wonders where people get these crazy ideas...

$2.00 for one weeks adventure wherein another world was touched by human beings. $2.00 wasn't even the cost of coffee and cigarettes for a week in 1969.

A poor value for the money...

An amazing state of affairs, here, I'd say.

The fact is, Americans spent (and spend) tons more money on cosmetics every year than the NASA budget has ever been.

I have long spoken about the decline in educational standards in this nation. This, I think might be a classic example of the sort of ideas that come from that lack.
Waspie_Dwarf
QUOTE (MID @ Nov 20 2007, 10:24 PM) *
The Apollo Program, for instance, cost about 4 cents per day for every American for the duration of the program. Apollo 11 cost each American about $2.00 each.

A poor value for the money? One wonders where people get these crazy ideas...

I remember reading somewhere that the average American spent more on bubble-gum than Apollo.
Alex01
QUOTE
I remember reading somewhere that the average American spent more on bubble-gum than Apollo.


laugh.gif That could be fact.
MID
QUOTE (Waspie_Dwarf @ Nov 20 2007, 09:42 PM) *
I remember reading somewhere that the average American spent more on bubble-gum than Apollo.



I don't know about bubble gum, Waspie...but it is a fact that Americans spent approximately 10 billion on cigarettes and approximately 40 billion on cosmetics in 1969...enough for two full Apollo programs in one year! It rather makes the debate about the cost of space exploration a little dumb...don't you think?



Alex01
QUOTE
It rather makes the debate about the cost of space exploration a little dumb...don't you think?


I always considered space flight very expensive due to it's complexity, safety measures, and other factors. But as I read the article, I realised I was incorrect, I still cannot understand how space flight demands such a low amount of money. Believe it or not this cought me by surprise. hmm.gif
MID
QUOTE (Alex01 @ Nov 23 2007, 03:13 PM) *
I always considered space flight very expensive due to it's complexity, safety measures, and other factors. But as I read the article, I realised I was incorrect, I still cannot understand how space flight demands such a low amount of money. Believe it or not this cought me by surprise. hmm.gif




It's actually bizarre to me to discuss the cost of something liike space exploration. It's really miniscule in compared to other things.
This seems to be a topic of some discussion on a couple threads. I just posted this illustration on another thread:


QUOTE
NASA's manned space exploration project budget for FY 2007 (Exploration Systems Mission Directorate) was about 3 billion dollars.
That's about $10.00 for each American, a bit less 3 cents per day.
This is what we're spending on Constellation, an expansive program designed to expand human presence in space and provide untold benefits.

3 cents a day.

Do you know how much money is going to be spent on Christmas in the next month?
Let's not go for the total...that's frightening. Let's just look at the next month's ON-LINE expenditures.


It'll be a relatively small fraction of the total "Holiday Season" expenditure in the U.S., but it'll still be 40 BILLION DOLLARS...on...Christmas shopping.

Let's see...

Christmas shopping (on-line, mind you) will be 40 billion dollars in the next 30 days.
That's $4.50 +/- for every person in this country, every day for the next month!

About enough money to fund 2 Apollo programs in their entirety, in a month ( ) and about 150 times what we spend on NASA' exploration project at the moment.

We could fund a complete return to the Moon (the next 10-12 years of Constellation, likely) with three Christmas on-line shopping months!

We will far and away exceed NASA's FY 2007 Space Exploration budget between November 23 and December 6 of this year...buying Christmas stuff.

There was some talk about the price tag being too high???

I am frequently amazed at this high price of space exploration talk.
The reality is that it is cheap.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.