QUOTE (kashshaptu @ Jan 13 2008, 05:27 PM)

I have always pondered something as time goes by animals and people change and adapt according to their surrounding environment and lifestyle, and of course as we go BACK in time things have a more simple design and are more "primordial". so what was the original structure of an animal? to see the first, basic structure of an animal I believe we could learn a lot about life perhaps. Would it be a simplistic flawless design? the ORIGINAL, the first. hmm just food for thought
This is actually a very interesting question!
In my most recent bio course we did a lot of phylogenetic analysis and talked a lot about the evolutionary relationships between organisms. This, combined with some stuff from an embryology book I have, actually lets us answer some of this question.
It kind of depends on what you mean by "animal". If you count sponges as animals (they're counted within the animal kingdom phylogenetically, as they are actually reasonably closely related to us) then the common ancestor of all animals was probably just a colony of cells using flagella to push water over it's surface and strain food out. Sponges just got more specialized in performing this task, getting bigger and more efficient at it. There's also a whole group of single-celled organisms closely related to the animals, called choanoflagellates, that have a similar lifestyle.
If you count jellyfish and other cnideria, we can infer that traits and developmental patterns common to all the animals in the group were present in the common ancestor. These include starting out as a hollow ball of cells which folds in on itself and gets a mouth, and not much else. It would've been pretty simple.
If you only count the animal phyla that are bilaterally symmetrical (this includes echinoderms like starfish, their larvae are bilateral) things are more intersting. It might not look like it, but ALL of these animals, including us, are segmented. When we develop, we get blocks of tissue called somites that develop in a similar way to the segments of arthropods. They are heavily modified during development and by the time we're more than a few weeks along in gestation all that remains to show of our own segmentation is the layout of our spinal column, and the way certain muscles of ours are actually two smaller muscles from separate somites that fused together during development. The homeobox genes that control deveolpmental layout in ALL animals also have similar patterns of expression in everything from humans to fish to flies. Looking at the ways those genes have been duplicated and rearranged in different organisms, we can see what original set of genes could've easily given rise to the sets that all these different types of animals now have.
There is a picture somewhere out there on the interwebs of the conjecture for what the common ancester of all modern bilaterians could've looked like, based on what were the most likely original traits and homeobox gene layouts. I will post it as soon as I find it.