Bob Lazar interview on Area 51
Click here to watch video - 07:58
Interview with Bob Lazar about Area 51 and other related topics, what was the truth behind Lazar's work at the infamous top secret base ?
Full Version: Bob Lazar interview on Area 51
Bob Lazar interview on Area 51
Click here to watch video - 07:58
Interview with Bob Lazar about Area 51 and other related topics, what was the truth behind Lazar's work at the infamous top secret base ?
QUOTE (SaRuMaN @ Dec 1 2007, 02:55 AM) 
...what was the truth behind Lazar's work at the infamous top secret base ?
The truth is that Lazar is a well documented liar...which makes anything he has to say irrelevant.
QUOTE (the_UNKNOWN_DEAD @ Dec 2 2007, 03:45 PM)
The truth is that Lazar is a well documented liar...which makes anything he has to say irrelevant.
If he is in fact a liar and is making all this up, then he is the most fluent, articulate, calm, and collected liar I have ever seen. He has details on everything he talks about.
QUOTE (the_UNKNOWN_DEAD @ Dec 2 2007, 03:45 PM)
The truth is that Lazar is a well documented liar...which makes anything he has to say irrelevant.
Where is a source showing he has lied?
QUOTE (Enigma wrapped in a puzzle @ Dec 2 2007, 01:46 PM)
Where is a source showing he has lied?
Google "Bob lazar lies" and find out...
To me it says a lot that UFO "fanatic" Stanton Freedman doesn't believe him. How sad is that?
Sadly, Bob Lazar has been found to be more of a con man than a whistle blower. Oh, it's possible that he worked in some capacity at the Groom Lake facility, but not as a scientist (he lacks the academic qualfications he claimed). Mr. Lazar's knowledge of basic physics is also very much lacking, which is most likely why Stanton Friedman (who holds a MS degree in physics) calls him a hoaxer.
Look at the content of the last video especially the formulas. What is he talking about. A scattering process? I do not think he is a fraud.
Remember the fact that a newspapers reported about Lazar and his work in 1982. Something that is surely very
unlinke for a technican employee. He has been called a physicist - so it should be truth.
Moreover there is absolutely no doubt, that it is almost impossible to proof anything now. At least we have non corrupted newspaper
report from 1982. Why should a press reported call him a physicist - because it suits better to the institution as a whole that is reported about?
A kind of improper declaration that makes Lazar temporaly a physicist? Remember that once, or exactly in the time before 1988, nobody laid emphasis on scientific titles.
It became important later to fix things becaused they can't be prover otherwise. Unfortunately when they had a look on that everything had vanished!
No financial interest!
Remember the fact that a newspapers reported about Lazar and his work in 1982. Something that is surely very
unlinke for a technican employee. He has been called a physicist - so it should be truth.
Moreover there is absolutely no doubt, that it is almost impossible to proof anything now. At least we have non corrupted newspaper
report from 1982. Why should a press reported call him a physicist - because it suits better to the institution as a whole that is reported about?
A kind of improper declaration that makes Lazar temporaly a physicist? Remember that once, or exactly in the time before 1988, nobody laid emphasis on scientific titles.
It became important later to fix things becaused they can't be prover otherwise. Unfortunately when they had a look on that everything had vanished!
No financial interest!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.