Full Version: Atlantis Found (for real)
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Ancient Mysteries & Alternative History
Everything this Ozi person writes is pertty funny he'll believe anything he reads because its not "mainstream" I'm totally thinking about writing abunch of books about crazy crackpot theories of mine and about secret wars between reptillian races and how they created clones of humans a million years ago on earth and how india got involved which started a nuclear war which wiped out just about everything on the planet. I bet I could become a cult underground writer and spawn abunch of internet crap with people taking everything i write about as fact and making websites all about my writings! it would be pretty sweet!
wow
QUOTE (Matt121 @ Dec 16 2007, 12:57 PM) 
Everything this Ozi person writes is pertty funny he'll believe anything he reads because its not "mainstream" I'm totally thinking about writing abunch of books about crazy crackpot theories of mine and about secret wars between reptillian races and how they created clones of humans a million years ago on earth and how india got involved which started a nuclear war which wiped out just about everything on the planet. I bet I could become a cult underground writer and spawn abunch of internet crap with people taking everything i write about as fact and making websites all about my writings! it would be pretty sweet!
well, i ve beaten ozi to that. the only difference is that unlike ozi who believes in what he imagines, what is in my imagination stays in my imagination!
QUOTE
The Library of Alexandria has been already written about by Clive Cussler in 'Treasure' - a Dirk Pitt Adventure and also in part in Matthew Reilly's 'The Seven Ancient Wonders'.
How writing the book on the following ideas?
1. A myster about Lake Titicaca, the nazca Lines and the mayan doomsday calendar all interlinked. lake titicaca as suspected was a the most important sea port...of the ancient world before a polar shift. as theorised by others...nazca lines were highway signs for spaceraft to land..and directions to various locations. a high tech archeological team..dives into titicaca...finds an sesaled entrance going deep...they open the entrance way and swim through and reach a cavern full of strange artefacts...one of the team accidently activates one of the artefacts...but doesnt know..interstellar beacon...u can put in anything from annunaki to the borgs...an alien race...the reptilian creatures who had genetically produced the homo sapiens...catch on to it. meanwhile another race..the benevolent aliens..give any name u care..also latches on to the singal and both move towards earth..the annunaki to take over planet earth once again..the benevolent aliens to prevent and aid the humans..develop morew further
2. Atlantis and Hollow earth. Anceint atlantis, its technologies didnt die. When the world wide catastrophes caused by polar shifts occured, the atlanteans shifted inside the hollow earth via the great opening near the poles. Some contacts were developed by atlanteans with the second generation humans...who formed cults and worshipped the atlanteans....the gods and goddesses of hinduism ..could be interpreted as atlanteans. present day - scientist predict another polar shift. The big brother america's technology vultures ..going thru ancient manuscripts decodes a manuscript considered non -decodable (not the voynich manuscript..voynich's considered childs scribble in front of this manuscript)..and leads to clues to the technology of the atlanteans. Free Science Movement - which advocates all technology should be shared among all the nations oppose america's technology vultures....the movement also is highly advanced technologically and militarily....backed by some countries and trusts.
both follow clues, crossing each others manyt times and enter the hollow earth ..just to get in between a civil war between altalnteans...dog eat dog..but the vultures and the movement have to band together to save their skin....gigantic battle ..flying machines of atlanteans...vs apache helicopters, harriers, flying jet packed soliders of vultures & the movement....atlanteans .. stop war...decide to integrate into the present world...and share their technology...but vultures try some backstabbing ..to kidnap...the atlantean top techno heads...again a battle...the movement wins the war...peace.....
just a thread...hehehe..i might be mad!!
While i was replying to the Garden Of Eden Thread..I had wrote..that Garden of Eden was NOT ON Planet Earth. It was in some other galaxy and some persons who mutinied or revolted were exiled to a backwater planet called Earth.
So here is a movie idea based on that lines..
In a distant planet in a distant galaxy, some life forms (not necessarily human, but humanoid) called ekki lived in a highly technologically advanced state on a planet called niburu. However technologically advanced they were, Genetic Manipulation was not allowed there. But a few scientists..secretly modifiy the genetic code of their own race and create the human being. situated on garden island in the middle of a vast ocean which was not that much accessible to others, they carried on their genetic manipulations creating other genetic monstorisities. Humans who were created were treated as slaves, to do the menial works there. Once scientist -anu, who helped create a superior human being had a soft corner for him since he was created his own genetic stock..had a father son relationship with the human whom we may call manu. (anu-na-ekki - anu of the ekki..or something and manu can be related to the first human created as per hindu mythology). anu, behind the back of the other scientists, programmed to sleep induce teach manu's brain with their entire knowledge. manu, now more knowlesgeable, rallies fellow slaves and fights against their masters....
mean while ,some other scientists working on a teleportation portal accidently create a time-space portal which breaks the plane tout of the orbit, transports it out of the solar system to a new solar system on the randokm and in highly eliptical orbit..in the new system. the planet is going out of the solar system and everything is freezing out. the battle between the humans and the ekki is getting over.....anu manages to get a few of the humans and asks them to escape the plane in a cryogenically enbquipped pod designed and programmed to find the most sutiable planet to match the human's life form...while anu himself is shot dead by the other ekkis.the planet niburu..goes into freeze and out of the solar system while humans land on planet earth....all other humans except manu and a woman die...
second portion /sequel can be after millions of years...the planet niburu ..which had been telported from a distant galaxy and thrown into an elliptical orbit in our solar system comes back into the solar system, thawing out and the ekki now finds the human's planet...earth /terra.....with a highly advanced civilisation..they cant bear this since humans were their creation and their slaves.................
hehehehe....i might be mad to think up all this.
How writing the book on the following ideas?
1. A myster about Lake Titicaca, the nazca Lines and the mayan doomsday calendar all interlinked. lake titicaca as suspected was a the most important sea port...of the ancient world before a polar shift. as theorised by others...nazca lines were highway signs for spaceraft to land..and directions to various locations. a high tech archeological team..dives into titicaca...finds an sesaled entrance going deep...they open the entrance way and swim through and reach a cavern full of strange artefacts...one of the team accidently activates one of the artefacts...but doesnt know..interstellar beacon...u can put in anything from annunaki to the borgs...an alien race...the reptilian creatures who had genetically produced the homo sapiens...catch on to it. meanwhile another race..the benevolent aliens..give any name u care..also latches on to the singal and both move towards earth..the annunaki to take over planet earth once again..the benevolent aliens to prevent and aid the humans..develop morew further
2. Atlantis and Hollow earth. Anceint atlantis, its technologies didnt die. When the world wide catastrophes caused by polar shifts occured, the atlanteans shifted inside the hollow earth via the great opening near the poles. Some contacts were developed by atlanteans with the second generation humans...who formed cults and worshipped the atlanteans....the gods and goddesses of hinduism ..could be interpreted as atlanteans. present day - scientist predict another polar shift. The big brother america's technology vultures ..going thru ancient manuscripts decodes a manuscript considered non -decodable (not the voynich manuscript..voynich's considered childs scribble in front of this manuscript)..and leads to clues to the technology of the atlanteans. Free Science Movement - which advocates all technology should be shared among all the nations oppose america's technology vultures....the movement also is highly advanced technologically and militarily....backed by some countries and trusts.
both follow clues, crossing each others manyt times and enter the hollow earth ..just to get in between a civil war between altalnteans...dog eat dog..but the vultures and the movement have to band together to save their skin....gigantic battle ..flying machines of atlanteans...vs apache helicopters, harriers, flying jet packed soliders of vultures & the movement....atlanteans .. stop war...decide to integrate into the present world...and share their technology...but vultures try some backstabbing ..to kidnap...the atlantean top techno heads...again a battle...the movement wins the war...peace.....
just a thread...hehehe..i might be mad!!
While i was replying to the Garden Of Eden Thread..I had wrote..that Garden of Eden was NOT ON Planet Earth. It was in some other galaxy and some persons who mutinied or revolted were exiled to a backwater planet called Earth.
So here is a movie idea based on that lines..
In a distant planet in a distant galaxy, some life forms (not necessarily human, but humanoid) called ekki lived in a highly technologically advanced state on a planet called niburu. However technologically advanced they were, Genetic Manipulation was not allowed there. But a few scientists..secretly modifiy the genetic code of their own race and create the human being. situated on garden island in the middle of a vast ocean which was not that much accessible to others, they carried on their genetic manipulations creating other genetic monstorisities. Humans who were created were treated as slaves, to do the menial works there. Once scientist -anu, who helped create a superior human being had a soft corner for him since he was created his own genetic stock..had a father son relationship with the human whom we may call manu. (anu-na-ekki - anu of the ekki..or something and manu can be related to the first human created as per hindu mythology). anu, behind the back of the other scientists, programmed to sleep induce teach manu's brain with their entire knowledge. manu, now more knowlesgeable, rallies fellow slaves and fights against their masters....
mean while ,some other scientists working on a teleportation portal accidently create a time-space portal which breaks the plane tout of the orbit, transports it out of the solar system to a new solar system on the randokm and in highly eliptical orbit..in the new system. the planet is going out of the solar system and everything is freezing out. the battle between the humans and the ekki is getting over.....anu manages to get a few of the humans and asks them to escape the plane in a cryogenically enbquipped pod designed and programmed to find the most sutiable planet to match the human's life form...while anu himself is shot dead by the other ekkis.the planet niburu..goes into freeze and out of the solar system while humans land on planet earth....all other humans except manu and a woman die...
second portion /sequel can be after millions of years...the planet niburu ..which had been telported from a distant galaxy and thrown into an elliptical orbit in our solar system comes back into the solar system, thawing out and the ekki now finds the human's planet...earth /terra.....with a highly advanced civilisation..they cant bear this since humans were their creation and their slaves.................
hehehehe....i might be mad to think up all this.
Now you tell me, have i missed out any?
Better yet, post it on YouTube. Everyone else is these days.
QUOTE (ThePitOfReason @ Dec 13 2007, 11:25 PM)
Well listen up! If this guy cant spell how could he find Atlantis? It is made not maid. A maid cleans your house you cant maid anything but I guess you could do the maid. And anyone that finds Atlantis why would they tease you with it. They would just tell you think about it.
Exactly.......and meanwhile the thread continues, without a pilot...steering in circles with no point.
"do the maid"
I have a feeling I know what he is referring to. I was messing around with Google Earth a while back. It appears to show a submerged continent south of iceland. I have no idea how accurate that is. But I doubt I am the first to see that. 'I think I found Atlantis' was my first thought too, but only jokingly.
How do you "see" a submeged continent through google earth?
The same way you see Jesus' face on a piece of toast, or the Mary in an oil slick.
--Jaylemurph
--Jaylemurph
Well, its aparent the OP is a story teller. I am sure you have seen his thread about he heard from his brothers friends co workers sister in law's brother twice removed cousins uncle that the worlds biggest reptile was found, the skull alone was 30 ft long, 60 ft high or something. I dont even remember it was so ganked up. He too said he couldn't report the findings yet, that he needed to get things in order. Guess what, he never came back.
This dude needs to get a life and stop telling stories, unless we are all sitting around a huge fire that can sit 55k+ ppl.
This dude needs to get a life and stop telling stories, unless we are all sitting around a huge fire that can sit 55k+ ppl.
still no word ,owell i told you cape breton is the capital island of this atlantis of the past, present and futur ,like god our father for ever and ever amen.
Oh yeah most of you cant contstructively destory my posts, instead you attack me personally, this only shows me, your scared.
Click to view attachment
3.6-million-year-old human footprints in Laetoli, in Tanzania.
There have been many findings demonstrating that Homo sapiens dates back even earlier than 800,000 years. One of them is a discovery by Louis Leakey in the early 1970s in Olduvai Gorge. Here, in the Bed II layer, Leakey discovered that Australopithecus, Homo habilis and Homo erectus species had co-existed at the same time. What is even more interesting was a structure Leakey found in the same layer (Bed II). Here, he found the remains of a stone hut. The unusual aspect of the event was that this construction, which is still used in some parts of Africa, could only have been built by Homo sapiens! So, according to Leakey's findings, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and modern man must have co-existed approximately 1.7 million years ago.219 This discovery must surely invalidate the evolutionary theory that claims that modern man evolved from ape-like species such as Australopithecus.
Indeed, some other discoveries trace the origins of modern man back to 1.7 million years ago. One of these important finds is the footprints found in Laetoli, Tanzania, by Mary Leakey in 1977. These footprints were found in a layer that was calculated to be 3.6 million years old, and more importantly, they were no different from the footprints that a contemporary man would leave.
3.6-million-year-old human footprints in Laetoli, in Tanzania.
The footprints found by Mary Leakey were later examined by a number of famous paleoanthropologists, such as Donald Johanson and Tim White. The results were the same. White wrote:
Make no mistake about it,... They are like modern human footprints. If one were left in the sand of a California beach today, and a four-year old were asked what it was, he would instantly say that somebody had walked there. He wouldn't be able to tell it from a hundred other prints on the beach, nor would you.220
After examining the footprints, Louis Robbins from the University of North California made the following comments:
The arch is raised - the smaller individual had a higher arch than I do - and the big toe is large and aligned with the second toe … The toes grip the ground like human toes. You do not see this in other animal forms.221
221 "The Leakey Footprints: An Uncertain Path," Science News, vol. 115, 1979, p. 196.
222 Ian Anderson, "Who made the Laetoli footprints?" New Scientist, vol. 98, 12 May 1983, p. 373
Chew on the above and ponder it.....answer this, and my previous post contstructively then, you may get a indepth answer back
Click to view attachment
3.6-million-year-old human footprints in Laetoli, in Tanzania.
There have been many findings demonstrating that Homo sapiens dates back even earlier than 800,000 years. One of them is a discovery by Louis Leakey in the early 1970s in Olduvai Gorge. Here, in the Bed II layer, Leakey discovered that Australopithecus, Homo habilis and Homo erectus species had co-existed at the same time. What is even more interesting was a structure Leakey found in the same layer (Bed II). Here, he found the remains of a stone hut. The unusual aspect of the event was that this construction, which is still used in some parts of Africa, could only have been built by Homo sapiens! So, according to Leakey's findings, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and modern man must have co-existed approximately 1.7 million years ago.219 This discovery must surely invalidate the evolutionary theory that claims that modern man evolved from ape-like species such as Australopithecus.
Indeed, some other discoveries trace the origins of modern man back to 1.7 million years ago. One of these important finds is the footprints found in Laetoli, Tanzania, by Mary Leakey in 1977. These footprints were found in a layer that was calculated to be 3.6 million years old, and more importantly, they were no different from the footprints that a contemporary man would leave.
3.6-million-year-old human footprints in Laetoli, in Tanzania.
The footprints found by Mary Leakey were later examined by a number of famous paleoanthropologists, such as Donald Johanson and Tim White. The results were the same. White wrote:
Make no mistake about it,... They are like modern human footprints. If one were left in the sand of a California beach today, and a four-year old were asked what it was, he would instantly say that somebody had walked there. He wouldn't be able to tell it from a hundred other prints on the beach, nor would you.220
After examining the footprints, Louis Robbins from the University of North California made the following comments:
The arch is raised - the smaller individual had a higher arch than I do - and the big toe is large and aligned with the second toe … The toes grip the ground like human toes. You do not see this in other animal forms.221
221 "The Leakey Footprints: An Uncertain Path," Science News, vol. 115, 1979, p. 196.
222 Ian Anderson, "Who made the Laetoli footprints?" New Scientist, vol. 98, 12 May 1983, p. 373
Chew on the above and ponder it.....answer this, and my previous post contstructively then, you may get a indepth answer back
Curious George
"My Mother the Vimana" Starring Jerry Van Dyke
QUOTE
I demand A sequel! tongue.gif
"My Mother the Vimana" Starring Jerry Van Dyke
QUOTE (Harte @ Dec 17 2007, 03:00 PM)
Curious George
"My Mother the Vimana" Starring Jerry Van Dyke
"My Mother the Vimana" Starring Jerry Van Dyke
Lol, although your full of it, i like your sense of humour.
Check the pic above, im sure your the one who used cry out, there is no historical or archeological evidence etc etc etc et c!
LOL
QUOTE (Ozi @ Dec 17 2007, 08:35 AM)
Oh yeah most of you cant contstructively destory my posts, instead you attack me personally, this only shows me, your scared.
Click to view attachment
3.6-million-year-old human footprints in Laetoli, in Tanzania.
There have been many findings demonstrating that Homo sapiens dates back even earlier than 800,000 years. One of them is a discovery by Louis Leakey in the early 1970s in Olduvai Gorge. Here, in the Bed II layer, Leakey discovered that Australopithecus, Homo habilis and Homo erectus species had co-existed at the same time. What is even more interesting was a structure Leakey found in the same layer (Bed II). Here, he found the remains of a stone hut. The unusual aspect of the event was that this construction, which is still used in some parts of Africa, could only have been built by Homo sapiens! So, according to Leakey's findings, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and modern man must have co-existed approximately 1.7 million years ago.219 This discovery must surely invalidate the evolutionary theory that claims that modern man evolved from ape-like species such as Australopithecus.
Indeed, some other discoveries trace the origins of modern man back to 1.7 million years ago. One of these important finds is the footprints found in Laetoli, Tanzania, by Mary Leakey in 1977. These footprints were found in a layer that was calculated to be 3.6 million years old, and more importantly, they were no different from the footprints that a contemporary man would leave.
3.6-million-year-old human footprints in Laetoli, in Tanzania.
The footprints found by Mary Leakey were later examined by a number of famous paleoanthropologists, such as Donald Johanson and Tim White. The results were the same. White wrote:
Make no mistake about it,... They are like modern human footprints. If one were left in the sand of a California beach today, and a four-year old were asked what it was, he would instantly say that somebody had walked there. He wouldn't be able to tell it from a hundred other prints on the beach, nor would you.220
After examining the footprints, Louis Robbins from the University of North California made the following comments:
The arch is raised - the smaller individual had a higher arch than I do - and the big toe is large and aligned with the second toe … The toes grip the ground like human toes. You do not see this in other animal forms.221
221 "The Leakey Footprints: An Uncertain Path," Science News, vol. 115, 1979, p. 196.
222 Ian Anderson, "Who made the Laetoli footprints?" New Scientist, vol. 98, 12 May 1983, p. 373
Chew on the above and ponder it.....answer this, and my previous post contstructively then, you may get a indepth answer back
Click to view attachment
3.6-million-year-old human footprints in Laetoli, in Tanzania.
There have been many findings demonstrating that Homo sapiens dates back even earlier than 800,000 years. One of them is a discovery by Louis Leakey in the early 1970s in Olduvai Gorge. Here, in the Bed II layer, Leakey discovered that Australopithecus, Homo habilis and Homo erectus species had co-existed at the same time. What is even more interesting was a structure Leakey found in the same layer (Bed II). Here, he found the remains of a stone hut. The unusual aspect of the event was that this construction, which is still used in some parts of Africa, could only have been built by Homo sapiens! So, according to Leakey's findings, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus and modern man must have co-existed approximately 1.7 million years ago.219 This discovery must surely invalidate the evolutionary theory that claims that modern man evolved from ape-like species such as Australopithecus.
Indeed, some other discoveries trace the origins of modern man back to 1.7 million years ago. One of these important finds is the footprints found in Laetoli, Tanzania, by Mary Leakey in 1977. These footprints were found in a layer that was calculated to be 3.6 million years old, and more importantly, they were no different from the footprints that a contemporary man would leave.
3.6-million-year-old human footprints in Laetoli, in Tanzania.
The footprints found by Mary Leakey were later examined by a number of famous paleoanthropologists, such as Donald Johanson and Tim White. The results were the same. White wrote:
Make no mistake about it,... They are like modern human footprints. If one were left in the sand of a California beach today, and a four-year old were asked what it was, he would instantly say that somebody had walked there. He wouldn't be able to tell it from a hundred other prints on the beach, nor would you.220
After examining the footprints, Louis Robbins from the University of North California made the following comments:
The arch is raised - the smaller individual had a higher arch than I do - and the big toe is large and aligned with the second toe … The toes grip the ground like human toes. You do not see this in other animal forms.221
221 "The Leakey Footprints: An Uncertain Path," Science News, vol. 115, 1979, p. 196.
222 Ian Anderson, "Who made the Laetoli footprints?" New Scientist, vol. 98, 12 May 1983, p. 373
Chew on the above and ponder it.....answer this, and my previous post contstructively then, you may get a indepth answer back
What you are doing sir is plagarism. You are simple copying from another site and taking credit for it yourself, while listing wrong sources. The UM rules state quite clearly:
2c. Copyrighted material: [b]If you quote text from another web site then please properly credit the source. Not doing so constitutes plagiarism, always include a source link with quoted material.[/b]
You did not source your article, but simple cut and pasted from a web site and listed THEIR footnotes for the two paragraphs referenced, 221 and 222.
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_man_11.html
QUOTE (Aztec Warrior @ Dec 17 2007, 03:12 PM)
What you are doing sir is plagarism. You are simple copying from another site and taking credit for it yourself, while listing wrong sources. The UM rules state quite clearly:
2c. Copyrighted material: [b]If you quote text from another web site then please properly credit the source. Not doing so constitutes plagiarism, always include a source link with quoted material.[/b]
You did not source your article, but simple cut and pasted from a web site and listed THEIR footnotes for the two paragraphs referenced, 221 and 222.
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_man_11.html
2c. Copyrighted material: [b]If you quote text from another web site then please properly credit the source. Not doing so constitutes plagiarism, always include a source link with quoted material.[/b]
You did not source your article, but simple cut and pasted from a web site and listed THEIR footnotes for the two paragraphs referenced, 221 and 222.
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_man_11.html
You know what i am getting sick of explainin this now, i dont use websites like you amatuers, i have books and e-books, and the ref i posted are valid, they are from those authors who made the point, so stick to it.
But i always welcome sites like the one you have given a link for, because it helps my cause. But just inform you for the last and 1000 time, MY SOURCES ARE NOT THE NET, WE HAVE CLEARED THIS BEFORE, I HAVE MENTIONED THE BOOKS I USE AND PROVED THE SOURCE OF THE QUOTES I USE.
QUOTE (Ozi @ Dec 17 2007, 09:19 AM)
You know what i am getting sick of explainin this now, i dont use websites like you amatuers, i have books and e-books, and the ref i posted are valid, they are from those authors who made the point, so stick to it.
But i always welcome sites like the one you have given a link for, because it helps my cause. But just inform you for the last and 1000 time, MY SOURCES ARE NOT THE NET, WE HAVE CLEARED THIS BEFORE, I HAVE MENTIONED THE BOOKS I USE AND PROVED THE SOURCE OF THE QUOTES I USE.
But i always welcome sites like the one you have given a link for, because it helps my cause. But just inform you for the last and 1000 time, MY SOURCES ARE NOT THE NET, WE HAVE CLEARED THIS BEFORE, I HAVE MENTIONED THE BOOKS I USE AND PROVED THE SOURCE OF THE QUOTES I USE.
You cut and pasted VERBATIM from the website I listed.
What the moderators want to do about it is another story.
QUOTE (Ozi @ Dec 17 2007, 03:19 PM)
You know what i am getting sick of explainin this now, i dont use websites like you amatuers, i have books and e-books, and the ref i posted are valid, they are from those authors who made the point, so stick to it.
But i always welcome sites like the one you have given a link for, because it helps my cause. But just inform you for the last and 1000 time, MY SOURCES ARE NOT THE NET, WE HAVE CLEARED THIS BEFORE, I HAVE MENTIONED THE BOOKS I USE AND PROVED THE SOURCE OF THE QUOTES I USE.
But i always welcome sites like the one you have given a link for, because it helps my cause. But just inform you for the last and 1000 time, MY SOURCES ARE NOT THE NET, WE HAVE CLEARED THIS BEFORE, I HAVE MENTIONED THE BOOKS I USE AND PROVED THE SOURCE OF THE QUOTES I USE.
but ozi your post is word for word the summary on that website. The souces sited do not refer to the full article but to the sources used for specific quotes in the article. therefore you did not cite your sources. Can you not see the difference?
Also, I am enjoying the wonderful spelling provided by the scholars.
Ozi, the sources you've cited are only the sources for specific numbered paragraphs contained within the article you've quoted, please always include a link to the actual page the article came from.
I don't think there's any reason to leave this thread open, most of the posts over the last few pages have either been bickering or people commenting on why the thread should be closed and I agree that it's probably time it was.
I don't think there's any reason to leave this thread open, most of the posts over the last few pages have either been bickering or people commenting on why the thread should be closed and I agree that it's probably time it was.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.