QUOTE (fullywired @ Dec 27 2007, 09:42 AM)

About Context
If a single sentence is flexible in regard to its context, then why are other solitary passages given so much import? For example the line 'in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost' appears only once in the entire Bible,(Matthew 28:19) and yet it is at the center of one of the great concepts of Christianity, the Trinity (Which, by the way, weakens Christian claims to monotheism, in the eyes of Jews and Muslims).
And yet... Christians stick by the explanation that we do not worship several God's but one all-powerful being who interacts with us in three forms.
QUOTE
Incidentally, Deuteronomy 4:28 refers to "idols of wood and stone" - the Christian Cross is wood, and inside of the Kaaba, the black box the Muslims all pray to, is a stone, a meteor.
Worship of the cross is not inherent in Christianity. I am not saying that it is not worshiped in some sects or congregations, but we are not called to do so at any time. We all use the cross as a visual reminder of the painful and degrading way in which our God sacrificed Himself for us.
QUOTE
If the context neutralizes what appears to be a contradiction, then doesn't the context also neutralize everything else in the book? The Bible is a holographic compendium of powerful metaphors; it is a fascinating, compelling labyrinth that can be a garden for its scholars; but its authority is chosen, and cannot be imposed on the unwilling.
Not sure at all what you are trying to say here.
QUOTE
Even if the context of a passage changes the meaning
so much that it 'no longer contradicts,' the fact is, that the
apparent contradiction is enough to prove the point that
there are contradictions, even if trivial.
http://dim.com/~randl/tcont.htmYou seem to be saying that if I say, "I'm going to kill you!" the fact that we are having an argument and I am saying it in frustration with no real intent of even attempting to carry that statement out means nothing because in a different context that phrase is a clear indication of my intent to murder you.
QUOTE (Leonardo @ Dec 27 2007, 11:00 AM)

Not only that, fw, but the context is usually very dependant on the level of belief in the reader. One who already believes in the religion will find a context to suit their belief - and such has already been read from the bible by scholars who do believe.
Context is like statistics, one can usually make it support the point you are trying to make/belief you are trying to support.
Nice try, Leo, but context is not a moving target.
The understanding of a particular text may change as we learn more about the author, audience, language of the original autograph, the culture, the original intent, etc., but it's not a subjective change, it is a change driven by increased understanding.