QUOTE (She-ra @ Dec 12 2007, 10:00 AM)

Personally I don't care if they are purple and asexual as long as they do what they promise and make a better world for all of us!
I don't care either (hopefully not many people do) but I think the election of someone from another segment of the population will be a great event sociologically. If half the country is female, the normal thing would be to have female presidents on a regular basis.
Obviously there is social resistance to having a president who breaks with the European white male tradition. I'm not asking which segment of the population would produce a better president (*shudder*- racist, sexist crap). I'm asking which group has the least social resistance and will break the barrier.
For example, would there be more social resistance to electing Hillary or electing Obama?
I realize that racially oriented posts often get deleted on this forum. But this question is meant to be about which group faces more social resistance.