DreamRebel
Jan 28 2004, 04:19 PM
[Edit] Post removed
Mentalcase
Jan 28 2004, 04:39 PM
Topic moved to the Skeptic's Corner. (seems like a good place for it, I guess.
)
Universal Absurdity
Jan 28 2004, 05:13 PM
i hope it works
a zero polluting car that runs on air...kinda like diet caffiene-free soda, same as the real thing but seemingly with nothing in it
PsychicPenguin
Jan 28 2004, 05:19 PM
Well... it's running on
compressed air, not really a breathing car. So it is still allowed by the laws of thermodynamics. I don't see any reason why it should be in skeptics corner
ambyglam
Jan 28 2004, 05:55 PM
a man once invented a car which runs on water instead of petrol, then he was killed, so the moral of the story is, if the government cant make tax on it, they wont allow it!
pity tho, pollution free water cars yey
PsychicPenguin
Jan 28 2004, 07:19 PM
Well, in general we consider water H2O to be in ground state, we canot really take any energy out of it. However there are energy technologies that are related to water.
- fuel cell, basicaly reacting Hydrogen and Oxygen gas to form water. This engine does not produce any pollution. It doesn't use water but rather produces water. The technology is widely available, applicable to cars, and I don't think the inventor was assasinated.
- fusion reaction, one type of nuclear reaction that uses heavy water. This reaction is much cleaner than the conventional nuclear engine. The size of the reactor will not allow this technology to be applied in automobiles in near future. So far it can only produce the same energy as it consumes. The inventor wasn't assasinated either.
Ancient World Wonders
Jan 28 2004, 07:57 PM
Intriguing, and highly unique. Does it run on hot air? If it does, I have some co-workers that can fill 5 tanks and then some.
bathory
Jan 29 2004, 02:37 AM
| QUOTE |
a man once invented a car which runs on water instead of petrol, then he was killed, so the moral of the story is, if the government cant make tax on it, they wont allow it!
|
it would just mean the government would tax water:)
Coconino_County
Jan 29 2004, 03:01 AM
| QUOTE (ambyglam1 @ Jan 28 2004, 04:55 PM) |
a man once invented a car which runs on water instead of petrol, then he was killed, so the moral of the story is, if the government cant make tax on it, they wont allow it!
|
I believe this statement to be based on an episode of the short lived X-Files spin off, The Lone Gunman. Good show, but it never found an audience. However, I do not believe a straight up water powered car has ever been invented. As forementioned, fuel cells use certain water ingredients, but I expect it will be a while before the technology is developed that would allow me to fill my gas tank up with my garden hose, and ride off into the sunset.
Dowdy
Jan 30 2004, 02:47 AM
a Japanese company made a car which runs on water. I saw it on the news once.
The guy held a cup to the back of the exhaust and then drank the water.
Pretty cool stuff
<bleeding_heart>
Jan 30 2004, 03:43 AM
Even if someone had managed to invent such a car the oil companies would give him more money to keep it quiet than to release it commercially.
Dowdy
Jan 30 2004, 04:02 AM
here is the article
Hydro car
PsychicPenguin
Jan 30 2004, 04:55 AM
It doesn't run on water, but hydrogen. It is based on fuel cell technology which will produce pure water on the exhaust. Well.. you get a car and a water purifier system at the same time.
aliwigan
Jan 30 2004, 09:59 AM
Water or air who's care as long it move

. I remember two men on telly got a car running on coke and that was going a while back and nothing more was heard of it.....
Scorpius
Jan 31 2004, 05:01 AM
| QUOTE (Atlantis Rises @ Jan 28 2004, 01:57 PM) |
| Intriguing, and highly unique. Does it run on hot air? If it does, I have some co-workers that can fill 5 tanks and then some. |
geeohn
Feb 1 2004, 01:30 AM
Athlon64
Feb 2 2004, 03:36 PM
Are you talking about a car here ? Your description sounds very much like the AVRO CAR, which was a 1950's project with the aim of producing a FLYING SAUCER ! It only ever managed to hover a few feet above the ground, and it swayed back and forth alarmingly.
Let's face it, trying to get a saucer shaped vehicle to fly in the 1950's (and powered by a jet engine, no less) was a waste of time........unless it was all a public front to hide what was
really going on (probably at Area 51).....
Dowdy
Feb 2 2004, 10:33 PM
geeohn,
were you talking about this
air carbesides, an air car and a car running on air is different
geeohn
Feb 3 2004, 02:53 AM
yep that is the car
moe eubleck
Feb 3 2004, 05:49 AM
an air car? As if traffic jams on the ground weren't bad enough............
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.