Hello. I have some images to share. Please click on the links below.
Thanks


http://www.marsesa.9f.com/slide_show.html

http://www.marsesa.9f.com

Source Image:

http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/marsex...2-Cydonia_H.jpg

Nice rocks.

Where did the pyramids go?

These fresh deposits suggest that at some places and times on present-day Mars, liquid water is emerging from beneath the ground and briefly flowing down the slopes.

This possibility also raises questions about how the water would stay melted below ground, how widespread it might be, and whether theres a below-ground wet habitat conducive to life(!).

Future missions may provide the answers.

Present-Day Gully Activity on Mars.

MGS MOC Releases MOC2-1618 through MOC2-1622, 6 December 2006

http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2006/1...ater/index.html

NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows in Brief Spurts on Mars.

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/dec/H...er_on_Mars.html

http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2006/1...lies/index.html

No offence to the topic starter but i found your info hazzard more interesting.

Some more interesting photos from mars:


Top one is from mars, two others is similar artificial ancient monuments on earth to compare.

Nozzle shooting out some liquid:


Closeup of the nozzle shooting out liquid, and notice other streams around and the curious dome the nozzles comes out from:


Skull?


Vegetation / forrests?

Lakes?


Weid liquid/ice/jelly kinda stuff with black things in it:


Strange structures. Lake with dam and river flowing down below?


Strange artifact looking like some old egyptian statue laying on its back:


Huge strange T shaped formation:


More lakes?


MORE AT http://www.MarsAnomalyResearch.com

If those pics are real than i am verry interested in anything else you know on the subject.

Those pics are real and can be found on NASAs own server where they are taken from.

Check the site I mentioned above, www.MarsAnomalyResearch.com where I got most of them from. A couple I grabbed from NASAs servers myself. At the site, all photos are linked to original nasa servers page with the photos.

I have more photos that are quite peculiar and interesting from Mars grabbed from NASA servers, a lot of them from the raw images section of the Mars Rovers, as well as several satellite photos etc.

When I get my other HD back up working I'll try get them posted.

Some of the photos looks like microscopical pictures of things... Interesting

http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/marsex...2-Cydonia_H.jpg Looks like gold to me
http://i15.tinypic.com/2dvpd38.jpg Ice cream?

And much more.

Funny jolly things up there no doubt.

Gotta try get my spaceship running

That picture with the nozzel spraying out a liquid is interesting.

Yes that one is among my favorites and of extreme interest. What could it be I wonder? Very strange, and it really does seem like a tube leading down into some kind of "dome" there. Weird, that is all I can say.

Total Recall

Here is the explanation of that image.

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum...14245&st=60

I looked at your link but didn't see any explanation, just another picture with more brightness which in my opinion made it less clear and thus harder to see any details - the first one seem to show more details.

Strange black "things" growing (?) up from the dunes at Mars:


Lol I like how this zoomed in version looks like som guy standing up there with his arms up (and no i dont really think its a person/being)


God been using his paintbrush on the surface of Mars:


More lakes??


Strange structure:


Rectangular "crops" , farmers of Mars?

Evidence of some type of liquid in Mars is evident from this photo. I believe these are geyser.


Rohn

137-021104-0533-6-3d2-01-HaleCrater.
All images reproduced and enhanced with the permission of JP Skipper.
Mars Anomaly Research.

An ancient city on Mars or pixelated image?

Rohn

The above image is from JP Skippers Mars Anomaly Research.

But take a look what we found.


closeup of the object,


Rohn

Here. See how this picture, more recent than the other one, show´s that the supposedly geometric shapes are not such. It´s really clear. They are just natural formation, almost for sure.



http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/s05_s10/fu...05/S0500534.jpg

Hard to say, it still seem a pretty strange formation. But yes it do look more possible to be natural from that photo, but would interesting to have some closeup pics of the area. Hm you happen to know if ESAs Mars Express went over this area?

Though of course there are many other more interesting things up there as we can see from many of the photos posted here so far. Besides the ones I posted, I found the one rhonds posted on top here interesting. Almost seem like bushes to me or some other botanical growth like trees or similar. It can look like geysirs too like he says but I would think that would make whatever liquid is shooting up forming some pools around the geysirs. Unless it evaporates immediately of course.

Hello everyone. I updated my slide show. I will be adding new images to my slide show.
So, Check my web site now and then.

I would like to thank everyone for the positive responses. Thanks.......
Ken

*BUMP*

Yes, I felt it was time to bump this post up some, as in the few last hours different people posted same pictures of a "statue" on Mars, which wasn't really very interesting at all. Rather the photos of this thread is MUCH more interesting and should be taken much more in consideration and looked into.

It's better having "mars photos" in one thread instead of creating same over and over with same photos.

so lets try keep it here, add those last "statue" photos if you want, and lets keep adding interesting Mars photos in this thread instead of spreading it all around posting the same stuff over and over.

Here is a new one for you while we are at it:

More vegetation evidence:



And a little more lakes and forrests:


Strange black hole:


Strange black hole close up:

Source: Mr Skipper at http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com and of course NASA for their photos.

Thanks.

OMFG at the darkhole.
It's just a balloon you know?

Baloon? On Mars? What baloon? You can clearly see the edges of the hole around, and it appears in different photos, as supplied above, one close up, and one taken at further distance, at different times.

Some very anomalous photos here.. i agree with the opinion on that other photo which is now viral. It will probably be as famous as the Cydonia 'face'. Nasa either missed it.. which is highly unlikely, or know what it is and it is nothing worth talking about.

Emma Acid:

What's your take on the photos presented in this thread (all pages) ?

I don't have one.

I believe that if Mars was capable of presently sustaining life (trees, "humanoids" etc) we would know about it. It simply isn't possible for there to be a clump of trees on a planet which to all intents and purposes (from every observation we've made) is completely dead. Eco-systems don't work like that.

And as for the "civilised remians", I'm not even wasting my breath. I see you posted up the "humanoid skull" one. So its possible for a skull to have survived all this time but no buildings?

The whole thing is ridiculous. Looking at satallite photos with no frame of reference as to the scale they're at, and then comparing them with things that we recognise from earth is painfully naive. More niave than UFOs, Planet X and the Loch Ness bloody monster all put together.

The words 'grasping' & 'straws' spring to mind.

Well, I've seen a UFO.

However, just seeing something unknown doesn't mean I came to any conclusion about what it was. Everything is possible (even mystery planets and lake monsters), but everything is not equally probable. Without definitive evidence all one really has is belief...and belief can (at times) be rather naive.

So have I actually.

But yes, I agree that its down to probability, which is what makes it all naive. What is the probability that the picture on the front of The Sun is of a tiny, 2 inch high martian??? Not very high. And yes we have people here saying its "defiantely" either a humanoid or a "statue" because thats what they been told that it looks like.

that hole is extremley intersting it seems to lead into an open cavern i remember reading somewhere that its a 1000 across, as for the 'plants' i dont know what they are very interesting none the less, however they do look like plant life, ive seen alot of pictures of them cant seem to find an explantion for them so for the monet im just going to stay undecided

But maybe it wasn't always (to use your words)...'completely dead'.

If something happened to the earth....and it moved further away from the sun...I
wonder what it might look like in a few thousand years time?


.........................................................................

Thanks to all the people who put these pictures in this thread. I've not seen them before and they are
facinating.....whatever they might be of.....they really are amazing!

Maybe it wasn't, but it certainly is now.

And as for "moving away from the sun" - that would take millions of years, if at all.

The fact is this is all the wrong way round, and you're kind of making excuses for rather silly speculation - surely we should find evidence of life or previous life and then wonder why it died out, instead of thinking that a blob on a photograph is a humanoid skull (for example) and then pointlessly speculating about it?

This is the point I was making....it may have, a long time ago, been different....to what it is now.



Not necessarily. How could you possibly know?



Where to start with this paragraph....?

I wasn't making excuses.....it wasn't silly speculation.....maybe there are things in these pictures that
do point to 'evidence' of previous life....and one example of wondering why it died out...could be that the position of Mars
in the solar system has changed.

That humanoid skull one has really 'saved your bacon' so to speak....in this series of photos, eh?
Perfect for your style of mockery.

Just to address the "Earth moving away from the Sun" issue; The Earth, Sun and all the planets are orbiting around the center of mass of the solar system (which is very near the Sun). Hence, the planets orbit the Sun and are not going to 'go out of orbit' unless something pretty darn spectacular were to happen. Remember, Gravity isn't a scientific law for nothing.

When I meant "millions of years" I was kinda guessing - reason being that I know that the moon is moving away from us about an inch a year. I thought the same may happen with us and the sun, but it would be a hugely protracted process.

Sorry, didn't actually do any research on it. Bad Emma.

>>>>wags finger at Bad Emma<<<<<<< ( Submissive doesn't suit you, 'Emma'... )

There are, I think, theories that the solar system may have suffered catastrophic changes
in the (distant?) past.

Mars has always been the planet that is considered the best bet for having had 'life' on it.

That is why these pictures are so interesting.....isn't it incredible to have such detailed photos
of Mars?....it makes the moon seem kind-of boring. But then we're used to close up pics of the
moon now....(I still love the moon...)

That last one really shocked me. I was watching a movie dated back to 2004 or whenever they lauched spirit or whatever that rovers called, and the guy said that if mars had water way back it would be in small lakes varied through out the dunes, but they would be red and full with acid that dissolves the rocks making it red.

Very interesting pictures darkbreed, but can you provide the link to the original nasa site?. Put the links here please. This is too good to be real. Provide the real nasa links to those pictures.

The black hole... looks TOO GOOD to be real. Its hard to believe it if the links to the nasa webpage with those pictures are not provided. For all we know, they could have been photoshopped or something.

Most of the photos I posted got the original nasa link embedded in them at top, those that have not can be found at www.MarsAnomalyResearch.com - it is a lot of material there but EVERYTHING is linked directly back to NASAs own original images.

A couple of the pics i posted may not be featured there as i found some on nasas servers myself without saving the link, my mistake if so.

Good luck, and have an interesting journey through the solar system!

Actually I agree, for once, that the image in question MOST LIKELY is just a natural rock formation due to its extremely small size.

With that said, there are many more interesting images posted in this thread, that is much harder to explain in a "rational" way which perhaps you might want to put your opinions on. What about those interesting nozzles shooting out some liquid? or the lakes? even the skeleton head is more than interesting as is very rare to find something as this in nature, though may not be impossible, it is improbable to find something so geometrically correctly shaped as the skull of some being. The mounds are kinda interesting too.

Regarding your statements about Mars most defiently being dead now, well how can you know? You were up there and had a walk around? Somehow I doubt that. So, you should rather say, that you believe it to be dead now. Though evidence shows that it is more possibly alive than dead, due to the growth and different appearance of various biological and botanical looking elements up there that changes through seasons.

As well as many other things.

So, the possibility is that it is either dead when it comes to phyiscal creatures and only got slight botanical sort of life left, or that it got some strange yet unidentified material that seem to be botanical but is not, or that it got both living creatures and botanical life. When it comes to water it is already a fact even stated by NASA themselves, and ICE and snow is existing on both poles, with what seems like liquid water around at its melting points just like here on earth (sorry dont have time to find a referance image to show you what i mean right now)

In additionan, personally I am in the disposal of an image from Mars, that shows what clearly looks like some lizard inside a crushed urn of some type, in other words two signs of life placed together (the lizard, and whomever crated the urn it is inside) which was taken by one of the Mars rovers. Also other anomalies is present on this image such as an interesting and strange metallic looking object. I still have no possibility to post this image as I am not currently at my home, nor do I have access to the harddrive they are saved on, but as soon I get to it I will post that and other images I personally gathered from NASAs own servers.

PEace

Look, im a believer. I believe some UFOs are intelligent spaceships, I believe there is a cover up from part of many governments, I believe that 2 alien saucers (or whatever you wanna call them) did crash in Roswell, but those pictures are just too good to be true. I searched in that website and I dont see any links that direct us to nasa. Maybe I did a bad research, but I would to see links provided of those pictures that direct us to the nasa website. Or just provide the link of where you started searching in that nasa webpage. Because I went to the nasa webpage and I dont know where to look at.

I really need to get the original sources so I can start showing them down here in Venezuela to some non-believers (if you wanna call them that way). What better way than Nasa´s own pictures to prove them wrong?. So you would make me a great favor if you can tell me where to look at. But dont direct me to that MarsAnomaly website because all I see is a person trying to sell his products and asking for money and that doesnt look good.

Those pictures look too good to be true. So if you can send me the link to the nasa pictures I can search for them myself, but provide me the link of the original source/nasa webpage. Otherwise the people im gonna show these pictures will say "photoshopped" "tricked" "fake", and I wont be able to prove them wrong since I dont have the links to the nasa pictures.

Best regards Darkbreed.

They're not photoshopped or faked. But that doesn't at all mean that they're evidence of life either. They're just something that we, non-scientists, don't recognise and try to fit into a earth-like frame of reference.

Exactly, if one looks around here on Earth one can find all sorts of natural geology that "looks like" human forms, animals, objects. It's the same sort of thing that allows one to see formations in the clouds.

With a lot of the martian terrain images, people try to fit them into to a sort of Earth style framework: "those look like trees" etc. Its doesn't mean thats what they actually are, and given what we know about mars's composition (no organics in the soil, very very little atmosphere, no magnetic field to shield from UV radiation, absolutely no sign of any life-supporting ecosystem etc) it makes it all the more unlikely.

If they are not fake, then they are really something. Still I need the links. That would be great.

Nice find guys, those are really some interesting pictures. Just need the original links.

Well of course they're something, just not what you're wanting them to be.

And as for the links, google Mars, Nasa, Express. The internet, its a wonderful thing.

I don't know much about eco systems, but an alien eco system could work differently from ours. Maybe not thought.



Agree with this statement completely. Stones are "stronger" than bones. I think if bones exposed like that skull would have long perished to the rough weather conditions of mars.



This also makes sense. Its a bit weird to compare features with our Earthly structures. Especially without size, distance, height references...



I loved this part. Very funny in a good way!!!

Yes of course, but then with that argument you're having your cake and eating it:

"this satellite photo from Mars looks like a bunch of trees - just like trees on Earth"

"but there is not enough atmosphere on Mars for Earth-like trees to exist, plus there's too much radiation for them to survive"

"but they might work differently to Earth trees"

...right, so they look enough like earth trees for it to be a serious possibility, yet when questioned on the details they're so alien that they could develop completely differently?? Its an argument that just doesn't make sense.

Besides which, UV radiation is lethal to life. All life. So I think that fact on its own discounts the possibility of life on Mars.