Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect

by

Judy Wood and John Hutchison

http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/


Excerpt:

=======================
In considering how the WTC complex was destroyed, many people have criticised the research posted here because it does not state or describe the exact technology employed.

These pages include data which strongly implicates a class of technology as being one of the main ones used.

The data below seem to strongly tie up with features of what has become known as “The Hutchison Effect”. The Hutchison Effect actually seems to describe a range of observed characteristics, some of which are listed below. John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been experimenting with “field effects” for almost 30 years. There is a great deal of information about him on the internet, and a selection is linked from this set of pages.

The table below lists effects and events seen at or in the vicinity of World Trade Center and compares those with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect. Clearly, the posting of this material is quite controversial, but even in the various documentaries that have featured John Hutchison, he has suggested that the techniques he has discovered and developed have been further refined by places like Lockheed Skunkworks, S.A.I.C. (Science Applications International Corp.), and also by perhaps other defense companies.
=======================


My comments: Although still under construction, the new paper gives many clues to the technology that was used to destroy the World Trade Center. Take a look at the many pictures and see for yourself! People can no longer claim that this technology does not exist. It definitely DOES exist!

Also note the two companies mentioned in the excerpt above (Lockheed Martin and SAIC). Both are sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society! The government even contracted with SAIC for the NIST Report.

See the "News" section of Dr Wood's website for upcoming interviews with Andrew Johnson where he will discuss the new paper. Also in the "news" section is a downloadable MP3 of an interview with John Hutchison.
http://drjudywood.com/#news


For proof that the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were all orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media, see my new article:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60


Also note the two Court Cases in the US District Court, Southern New York, with attorney Jerry Leaphart:

Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...e1=federal_case


Bottom line... there were NO hijackings on 9/11 and the entire War On Terror is BOGUS!

Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCDu2V3yjS4

As retired Aerospace Engineer Joseph Kieth says: "The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&..._planer_resigns


What about the eyewitnesses who say they saw planes hit the towers, you ask? See the following analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews, which were published in the New York Times. You'll learn that only a very small percentage of the First Responders reported seeing airplanes hit the towers. Even fewer reported hearing them. But... they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on! Whatever they saw "hit" the towers was a projection:

Going in Search of Planes in NYC
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...4&Itemid=60


What about the airplane wreckage, you ask? Well, first of all, there are NO verified airplane parts. (The government refuses to release any.) And second, when an airplane crashes into a building, the engines are not going to wind up underneath scaffolding:
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/jan..._230806wtc7.jpg

See here for more:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&..._with_jones#NBB


What about the cell phone calls, you ask? Faked using advanced voice synthesizer technology as reported in the Washington Post two and a half years before 9/11:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/natio...arkin020199.htm



There were NO hijackings on 9/11.

There were NO plane crashes on 9/11.

The entire War On Terror is BOGUS.

Dr Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson on WPFC - We Ourselves 14th Jan 2007

Dr Wood and Andrew Johnson discuss how it looks as if the WTC was destroyed by some type of techonology related to the Hutchison Effect


MP3:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/audio/91...0Jan%202007.mp3


VIDEO:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7438627977642539647

CB_Brooklyn hello,

Nearby to me, there lives an insurance executive. He was in a business meeting with the executive board of his company, on the morning of 9/11, in the first hit tower of the WTC, 4 floors below where the airliner hit. He even called his wife from there, before the first collision.

He says that an airliner did hit the building, very hard. He is still alive today. He immediately started to escape. The elevators were not available, so he ran down all the stairs to the ground floor. He left the city before it was closed off. And he hired a private vehicle out of the New York State.

John Hutchison is a fraud, a compulsive liar and a con-man.
Hutchison has never been able to duplicate his results in a controled environment.

http://socialtech.ca/ade/index.php/2005/05...nnel-is-bogus2/
http://www.skywise711.com/Skeptic/Hutchison/hutchison.html
http://actionskeptics.blogspot.com/2007/01...-in-canada.html
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=103565

These people can do the "Hutchison Effect" too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Z1eLnfIRg
http://www.trailerparkscience.com/#Experiments
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SKZo4SoPjjw&feature=related
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KywkBdLqaDU

I remember watching the TV and witnessing the planes flying into the buildings and the buildings catching on fire and then collapsing.

Do you know how the Hutchinson effect is meant to work?

Well for those that don’t its basically this:

By bombarding an object with extremely high frequencies from a vandergraff generator and tesla coil you should be able to alter the rate at what the objects molecules resonate at, buy doing this in theory you could change the objects physical properties like mass and atomic weight, in theory you could "vibrate" an object to such a high frequency that the objects molecules phase into pure energy like a microwave/UV beam.

However I am sure that not one person has been able to reproduce the Hutchinson affect

The only people who say he's a fraud is the government. The man is a brilliant physicist. whether he found zero point energy or learned to levitate objects is another story. theres no proof saying he has or hasn't. so before you go throwing stuff at someone about being a fraud ask yourself if you know anything about what hes talking about anyways. if you knew half of what he speaks about what he did in his videos isn't as far fetched as they may seem.

well, it's his job to prove it! It's his responsibility... if he's a brilliant physicist he should know this.
He doesn't know this, he can't prove it.. he's full of crap.

I personally believe that their is a conspiracy regarding 9/11. However, there is far more convincing evidence than what is presented by John Hutchison. His evidence/belief/theory borders on the inconceivable side of the conspiracy theory.

Yep, I'm the government. Brilliant physicist, WTF? John's told me that he doesn't even understand basic physics. Any physicist would agree that what he says is a bunch of nonsensical psychobabble. Most third graders know more about ZPE that Hutchison. Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMNZyOs7UU0

Anything with the name Judy Wood attached to it is sure to be a pile of steamy poop.

LOL!

And the government loves to put steamy poop on their websites.