QUOTE
Since you are a Ph.D. botanist (or is it Sc.D. ?), you know, or ought to know, that contemporary scientific opinion is that the prevalence of traits is determined by selective advantage, not "need."
Traits are determined by your surrounding environment and we 'need' these traits to adapt to our surrounding environments to give us the advantage over other species. We simply do not need these powers to give us the advantage and keep progressing which is why we don't have them.
If we had evolved to have such abilities then there would be no debate here... There isn't one anyway as far as I'm concerned or at least not until something is brought to the table to start one anyway.
The key word in your post is 'opinion' and there are endless opinions regarding evolutionary theory.
QUOTE
And this is "the absence of evidence is evidence of absence."
The status of a negative search result depends on the thoroughness of the search, as well as the credibility of alternative hypotheses in light of the result.
Many researchers have searched all around the world investigating claims of TK and came up empty handed.
QUOTE
Example: I lost my spare car key the other day, and it failed to turn up after what impressed me as a reasonable, even uneconomically lavish, search. Eventually, it did turn up, after I had deployed one of the usual expedients for extending search (in this case, re-examining places already investigated, but from a different vantage point).
Under the "A of E is E of A" heuristic, I ought to have given up when I reached into my pocket, and the key was not there.
Thats a bad analogy...
You knew the key had to be somewhere because it was in 'your' hand.
With TK this is what we get... 'I have this power etc', 'Can you prove to me you have this power', <insert excuse here>.
People claim TK exists but no one or at least the people here are willing to back up this claim with something tangible... If TK existed it would be able to be measured... How come no one is willing to have this power measured?
In the case of TK absence of evidence is evidence of absence... Not only do such abilities go against already established known universal law regarding energy and matter but with all the claims over the years how come nobody has been willing to cooperate and end the debate. Remember we can only in this case rely on evidence and since there is none being presented and since th only way to prove a negative is the absence of evidence there is only one logical conclusion that can be made until something tangible shows up, and this is of course that such abilities cannot and do not exist.
QUOTE
And there is a third illegitimate argument in your post, and that is in your new sig. How nice that you are Dr. AtheistGod Botanist. Arguments from authority have no place in scientific discourse. Oh yes, you didn't mean it as an argument, it just showed up in your sig.
My signature has hidden meaning.... Not related to this specific argument and I will tell you why if you request in PM as the subject matter and plants i specialize in these cannot be discussed here on these boards due to forum policy...
QUOTE
Successful scientific arguments convince. If yours do not, then do not blame your audience. Oh, they're too young, they're neurotic, they have low self-esteem, ... etc.
They convince people that are willing to accept it... In case you haven't noticed many people here are simply not willing to accept any argument that violates their perception regarding this specific subject matter. Never the less it never hurts to try..
QUOTE
If you believe that your audience is incapable of rational thought, then why are you corresponding with them? And if they are capable of rational thought, and you have failed to convince them, then it is your burden to make better arguments, not theirs to be convinced by whatever you choose to serve up.
My main argument is where is the evidence?
If you weren't busy singling me out here and attacking me left right and center as you have consistently done and go and red many of these peoples back posts you will find their general consensus regarding scientific method is one of distrust and disbelief when faced with tough questions and especially when asked to present some evidence to back those claims up by the skeptics here.
You will find that some members here no matter how good the argument will still say otherwise.
QUOTE
Feel free to report this post to a moderator, too. Arguments from intimidation are also impermissible in scientific discourse.
I wont report you but I will ask you one more time to stop making the thread about me. So please stop making your posts of a personal nature as I am not the subject matter here but rather the existence of TK.
I honestly do not like to report people but I will simply because I don't have to put up with crap. This has nothing to do with intimidation and everything to do with preventing posts that attack me personally.
Don't hate the player, hate the game.