QUOTE (Irish @ Jan 22 2008, 07:17 PM)

Ok a couple of questions to start the ball rolling..
Is it true that your secret temple oaths are based on the Scottish Rite Masons.
There are some very slight similarities, but no, the ceremonies were present before any Masonic influence. For a time membership in the Mason organization was encouraged to aid in reducing the social stigma that we had gained. A few early leaders had been a part of the organization, but it did not relieve the social problems the LDS were having. Thus membership in the organization was no longer encouraged.
QUOTE (Irish @ Jan 22 2008, 07:17 PM)

Is it true before 1978 Mormons considered the Negro race inferior, and even one drop of Negro blood prevented a person from entering their priesthood.
This is not true, although for quite some time Negroes were not ordained to the priesthood until 1978. Many cite this as evidence that we were racist, yet one of the problems that the people back east had with Mormons was that we were voting to end slavery. The LDS Church was one of the most forward thinking groups during this time. We have never considered Negroes inferior in any manner. I could find little explanation for the Negroes not having the priesthood prior to 1978, but I will search more.
QUOTE (Irish @ Jan 22 2008, 07:17 PM)

Is it true that according to Anton Lavey's Satanic Bible, the demon god of the living dead is called "Mormo". Is it just a coincidence that the Mormons are so concerned with the dead?
I have never heard of this statement. Yes, it is just a coincidence as far as I know. We are concerned with the dead in that we believe our ancestors should have the same opportunities to join the Church that we have had. Temple ordinances are on the large part for and in behalf of the dead. We perform the Temple ordinances as well as baptism for and in behalf of the dead. These ordinances can only be performed by the living according to our belief. We thus perform the ordinances and the dead may choose to accept these ordinances or deny them.
I personally believe the period between death and the second coming is much like here, little absolute knowledge of God is gained and our beliefs remain the same as they do here. Missionary work occurs there and thus these ordinances must still be accepted to be valid.
QUOTE (Irish @ Jan 22 2008, 07:17 PM)

Is it true that their Prophet Joseph Smith did not die as a martyr as they claim, but was killed during a gun battle in which he himself killed two men and wounded a third.
No, Joseph Smith died in Carthage Jail as a martyr. Yes, he fired a pistol, purportedly killing two men and injuring a third. Joseph Smith was shot twice in the back and once in the chest. I don't see how someone could claim that he did not die as a martyr.
QUOTE (Irish @ Jan 22 2008, 07:17 PM)

Is it true that Joseph Smith taught that there were inhabitants on the moon, and Brigham Young taught there were inhabitants on the sun as well!
I believe the moonmen comments were based on scientific opinion of that time. If you do some research you will find that many scientists at that time believed the moon to be inhabited.
On a side note, and probably part of the continuation of such stories. We use the Sun, the moon and the stars as symbols of the three main divisions of heaven, termed "Degrees of Glory." Brigham Young's comments were to the idea that God resides on a planet near a sun given the Name "Kolob."
QUOTE (Irish @ Jan 22 2008, 07:17 PM)

sorry but one last thing.Is it true that Prophet Joseph Smith prophesied falsely many times. For example, he foretold the second coming of Christ for 1891. The Bible teaches that one false prophecy puts the prophet under death sentence. (Deuteronomy 18:20-22).
There are claims to various "false prophecies." The one you reference is this:
QUOTE
D&C 130: 15-17
15 Joseph, my son, if thou livest until thou art eighty-five years old, thou shalt see the face of the Son of Man; therefore let this suffice, and trouble me no more on this matter.
16 I was left thus, without being able to decide whether this coming referred to the beginning of the millennium or to some previous appearing, or whether I should die and thus see his face.
17 I believe the coming of the Son of Man will not be any sooner than that time.
Most detractors only read verse 15. 16 and 17 bring the statement into context.
All false prophecy accusations that I am aware of ignore context or some aspect of the statement. They attack with having the complete quotation. Nost are as easy to show as false accusations as this.