http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscurantist

..."Opposition to the spread of knowledge

..."Accusations of deliberate vagueness, obscurity, or ambiguity

are the two main points. I kept wondering where from I was drawing from my mind the title I chose...
Obfuscation: n.~
1. to confuse, bewilder, or stupefy.
2. to make obscure or unclear: to obfuscate a problem with extraneous information.
3. to darken.

I was curious of some who claim that they are incapable of lies, or the act of being lied to, what their reaction is to this.
Where it is accepted practice, throughout documented gov't practice. The first in the article being Plato---and the mentioned "Noble Lie".

This, in my opinion, is the reason for disclosure (at times) of things like the Shadow Gov't. How it at one time intends N.W.O. Then, failing, goes "Green" and wants sweeping 'Change...'

Lying, that there's no information on say: ET's. To later recant and explicitly state it's a form of mind-control (seems to be the new movement) is somewhat ridiculous. Rings of un-truth. Over-inundation of factual evidencing.
Where, perhaps, they were slammed in the face with the inevitable. Sup(b)jects not going by the Way-Side. Once well claimed. No, joked of.

This may be slightly confusing, hinting at a large segment of recorded timings.

But, again, with this being recorded practice by gov'ts for some time. Why would some not see or accept possibility?