QUOTE (Paranoid Android @ Mar 7 2008, 09:08 AM)

Hi FW -- how do you see that the RC has changed its view/s on hell?
Since the time the RC adopted Dante's fictitious tale about hell as a true description of a real hell, they have taught that un-biblical idea, and still do so.
The following is from the website of the Catholic Encyclopedia article on "hell".
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07207a.htm"…The Holy Bible is quite explicit in teaching
the eternity of the pains of hell. The torments of the damned shall last forever and ever (Revelation 14:11; 19:3; 20:10). …"
"…According to the greater number of theologians the term fire denotes a material fire, and so a real fire.
We hold to this teaching as absolutely true and correct. …
there is no sufficient reason for taking the term as a mere metaphor. …"
The RC has used parables as teachings of reality. Also, they teach incorrectly that "the lake of fire" is eternal hell-fire; the truth being that that is the moment of instant death of unrepentant mortals, after the "second" resurrection.
If you can see where I am mistaken, please post some references regarding that.
Vatican officials later clarified that while hell
is real and eternal, the Pope was not claiming that it is a
physical place. Rather, he was expressing the view of the Catholic catechism that hell is a "
state of eternal separation from god," to be understood "
symbolically rather than
physically ." you are reading out of date material
another quote from Pope John Paul
In the words of Pope John Paul II, "The images of hell that Sacred Scripture presents to us must be correctly interpreted. They show the complete frustration and emptiness of life without God. Rather than a place, Hell indicates the state of those who freely and definitively separate themselves from God, the source of all life and joy".[11] An [b]earlier/b] catechism, however, describes the suffering of those in hell in more traditional terms, as fiery "punishment" rather than as "self-exclusion" from God.[12]
There it is, taking the fire out of Hell.
And more recently, less than a month ago, we find the denial of Hell coming from Pope John Paul II, who said, “Hell is not a physical place but the state of those who freely and definitively separate themselves from God.” He denied that Hell is a place of fiery torment. He went on to say that Hell is not a punishment imposed by God and that eternal damnation “is not God’s work but is actually our own doing.” (Reuters, July 29, 1999)
There it is, taking the fire out of Hell.
And there are many, many others who do not believe in Hell.
Fuller Theological Seminary’s new doctrinal statement departs from its original position on eternal punishment for believers, simply saying that the wicked shall be separated from God’s presence. (FEA, News & Views, May/June 1971)
Michael Van Horn, Grand Rapids Baptist College and Seminary, while Assistant Professor of Bible, Religion and Ministries, denied that there was a literal heaven or a literal hell. He especially denied that there was any “literal fire” in hell.
There it is, taking the fire out of Hell.
Bill Phipps, Moderator, United Church of Canada, “I have no idea if there is a hell. I don’t think Jesus was that concerned about hell. He was concerned about life here on earth. Is heaven a place? I have no idea.” (Ottawa Citizen, Oct. 23, 1997)
http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/taking...e_out_hell.html fullywired