Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: who believes in nibiru?
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Extraterrestrial Life & The UFO Phenomenon
Pages: 1, 2, 3
carpost
who believes in nibiru? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.
Cradle of Fish
QUOTE (carpost @ Mar 23 2008, 05:15 AM) *
who believes in nibiru? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.


A body that size passing through the inner solar system would have destroyed the orbits of the inner planets aeons ago. And we would have seen it ages ago.
Sporkling
Of course it is real. Its definatly real.
Foolosophy
QUOTE (carpost @ Mar 22 2008, 08:15 PM) *
who believes in nibiru? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.

If it's supposed to be in our solar system (which the believers say it is) we would have detected it.
badeskov
QUOTE (Foolosophy @ Mar 23 2008, 04:15 AM) *
If it's supposed to be in our solar system (which the believers say it is) we would have detected it.


Indeed. Claiming otherwise displays a such profound lack of knowledge in physics that it borders on rendering oneself utterly irrelevant...

Cheers,
Badeskov
hazzard
QUOTE (badeskov @ Mar 23 2008, 11:19 AM) *
Indeed. Claiming otherwise displays a such profound lack of knowledge in physics that it borders on rendering oneself utterly irrelevant...


yes.gif
Cradle of Fish
Compare a reasonable response based on reality:

QUOTE (Cradle of Fish @ Mar 23 2008, 09:18 AM) *
A body that size passing through the inner solar system would have destroyed the orbits of the inner planets aeons ago. And we would have seen it ages ago.


to:

QUOTE (Electrokinesis is me @ Mar 23 2008, 09:25 AM) *
Of course it is real. Its definatly real.


Care to share its whereabouts with us?
Evangium
QUOTE (carpost @ Mar 23 2008, 02:15 PM) *
who believes in nibiru? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.

So what you're actually saying is you believe in Nibiru, and want to rap with like minded folks, since you're not interested in anything that could prove it's non-existance....
Bender.
who believes in chocolate coke? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.
Pax Unum
QUOTE (carpost @ Mar 22 2008, 11:15 PM) *
who believes in nibiru? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.

it's not up to us to prove it doesn't exist, it's on the person making the claim to prove it does... can you prove it exists?
ships-cat
I don't believe in Nibiru currently. However, my opinion on this topic is available for hire for the right sum of money, as it would otherwise have absolutely no bearing on my life, and be of no importance.

Bids to start £30 for a casual "yes, I believe in Nibiru", rising to £100 if you wish me to actively argue for its existence.

Meow Purr.
Diedtrying
OK I'm gonna play devils advocate here.

QUOTE
A body that size passing through the inner solar system would have destroyed the orbits of the inner planets aeons ago.


What size is this? and what size body would you need to disrupt the planets? and can you explain why it would disrupt the planets orbits.

QUOTE
And we would have seen it ages ago.


I'll give you that. wink2.gif and leave this thread to rest.





midtown5dw
QUOTE (Bender. @ Mar 23 2008, 05:37 PM) *
who believes in chocolate coke? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.



No way!!!!! thats just a myth. i have a vanilla coke right next to me tho. Man id give 1000000 dollars to someone that can prove that chocolate coke.



Who wants to take on the challenge?
bee
I don't know if it will be the fabled Nibiru that comes.....I don't know if it will be anything
that comes.....but I came across the below quote....in a transcript from
this video from this site

and it MAY be relevent......it's an interesting angle on the 'incoming' anyway..... thumbsup.gif




QUOTE
Bill: In his work with NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Henry had encountered this a number of years ago.

David: Daniel said the same thing. Daniel said that NOAA had discovered that the sun was actually becoming... it was going in the opposite direction of where they expect the stars usually evolve. That it was becoming... I guess it was becoming bluer and brighter, and that they were aware of this interplanetary climate change that they were suppressing it from the people, and part of it was that they just didn’t want to rewrite the textbooks about the way the stars evolve because they found out it was backwards. You know...

Bill: One of the things that Henry told me just a few days ago is that the way the sun works is not the way they teach you at school.

David: Oh, yeah.

Kerry: But he also said there is, there is a brown dwarf. Henry said it was the second sun, and it was a fait accompli... that this was just commonplace knowledge.

Bill: This is what the South Pole Telescope is for. I mean, a lot of people have kind of cottoned on to that by now. Henry stated that to me in bold terms. "Yes," he said, "the South Pole Telescope is there specifically to observe this incoming object. It’s going to be coming in in the southern hemisphere... when it comes in."


Magnatude
I believe there is something bringing in mass extinctions every 7 million years.
Perhaps nibiru is this Nemesis star/brown dwarf.

We will likely know more in June 2009 when/if the WISE Mission happens.
badeskov
QUOTE (carpost @ Mar 22 2008, 09:15 PM) *
who believes in nibiru? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.


And I have invisible pink elehants dancing ballet in my living room...Here is a thorough examination of Mr. Sitchin's factual errors in his interpretations of ancient texts (where he, among other things, got his Nibiru fantasy from).

Try and read it...

Cheers,
Badeskov
badeskov
QUOTE (Diedtrying @ Mar 23 2008, 10:49 AM) *
OK I'm gonna play devils advocate here.


Sorry for intruding on your question to Cradle, but he hasn't really been up to standard's lately regarding debunking (ahem wink2.gif )...

QUOTE
What size is this?


Good question; I don't think anybody can really give you a good answer...I think mostly it ranges from 4 times the size of Earth to slightly smaller than Jupiter.

QUOTE
and what size body would you need to disrupt the planets?


Another good question, I guess that depends on what kind of disruption we are looking at. But anything the size of 4xEarth and upwards would destroy the orbits if it was flying from the outer skirts of the solar system inwards to pass close by the sun..

QUOTE
and can you explain why it would disrupt the planets orbits.


Gravity.

QUOTE
I'll give you that. wink2.gif and leave this thread to rest.


Oh bugger, I kept it alive wink2.gif

Cheers,
Badeskov

Edited for typo.
bee

This site has some interesting things to say.....re. the South Pole telescope....
and Nibiru!

Here is the site......SOUTH POLE TELESCOPE NEW PLANET X TRACKER

And some snippits from the site.....



QUOTE
America is now spending huge sums to deploy the massive The South Pole Telescope (SPT) in Antarctica. The final installation will be the size of a mini-mall and will require a massive C-130 airlift effort to transport pre-assembled modules and a large staff to the most desolate, inhospitable and inaccessible region of the world. Why? Because Planet X / Nibiru was first sighted in 1983 and this discovery spurred the USA to build the SPT — humanity's new Planet X tracker.



QUOTE
A key person in the revealing content of this article is a former US intelligence officer by the name of John Maynard. These days, he is best known for his involvement with Dr. Steven Greer’s Disclosure Project. With regards to this article, his explanation of how our government first began tracking Planet X / Nibiru in 1983 is now being corroborated with the deployment of the South Pole Telescope (SPT) in Antarctica.



QUOTE
John finally told me it had been imaged by NASA’s IRAS infrared sensing satellite in 1983 and that the mechanical failure story was used as a cover story. As he explained it to me, the IRAS data started pouring in, and that’s when they found Planet X. During one sweep, it stood out like a sore thumb; worse yet, it is approaching from the South.

This was especially bad news because the vast majority of the world’s most capable observatories are north of the Equator, and the decision was made to devote the remaining lifespan of the IRAS spacecraft to the observation of this one object.



I'm gob-smacked that this Nibiru business MIGHT turn out to be true!!!

You hear about it...over the years....you think....is it true? is it there? has anyone seen it?
would the public be told if they did see it?.......

Brown dwarf? Second sun? Nibiru? Nothing? Something?

dest_titor1
If it was real then we should see alterations in Eris` orbit and Pluto`s orbit, kuiper belt object would be blocked for long periods of time (which we do not see), and we would see it reflect infrared radiation like Pluto does, it would be easy to see with reflected energy.
badeskov
QUOTE (bee @ Mar 23 2008, 01:04 PM) *
This site has some interesting things to say.....re. the South Pole telescope....
and Nibiru!

Here is the site......SOUTH POLE TELESCOPE NEW PLANET X TRACKER


Uhm, and why exactly would you believe that site?! Here is their statement for it's intended use.

QUOTE
Beginning in November 2006, a group of scientists, technicians, and engineers will build the largest telescope ever deployed at the South Pole. The South Pole Telescope will be an important part of the International Polar Year activities. Once it's completed in February 2007, the telescope will give astronomers a powerful new tool to explore dark energy, the mysterious force that may be causing the universe to accelerate.


Emphasis mine. Obviously. nothing to do with Nibiru whatsoever. Then someone will counter that of course the Government would not put Nibiru on the web page, but rather some odd phenomena like dark energy. Guess what, it is not the Government running the facility, it is a consortium - mostly universities:

U Chicago
UC Berkeley
U Illinois UC
Case WR U
JPL
Smithsonian
McGill U
CU Boulder
UC Davis

Sure, JPL is in there as well, but as a part of a consortium. Thinking that the Government could somehow run a facility like that covertly shows a distinct lack of knowledge on how such programs actually work, by all means of respect.

Oh, and by the way, Anarctica would decidedly be the wrong place to put a telescope looking for a planet like Nibiru...

QUOTE
I'm gob-smacked that this Nibiru business MIGHT turn out to be true!!!


Please don't be, it isn't true.

QUOTE
You hear about it...over the years....you think....is it true? is it there? has anyone seen it?
would the public be told if they did see it?.......

Brown dwarf? Second sun? Nibiru? Nothing? Something?


You got it, absolutely nothing wink2.gif

Cheers,
Badeskov
badeskov
QUOTE (dest_titor1 @ Mar 23 2008, 01:19 PM) *
If it was real then we should see alterations in Eris` orbit and Pluto`s orbit, kuiper belt object would be blocked for long periods of time (which we do not see), and we would see it reflect infrared radiation like Pluto does, it would be easy to see with reflected energy.


Yup thumbsup.gif

Cheers,
Badeskov
Diedtrying
QUOTE (badeskov @ Mar 23 2008, 07:01 PM) *
Sorry for intruding on your question to Cradle, but he hasn't really been up to standard's lately regarding debunking (ahem wink2.gif )...



Good question; I don't think anybody can really give you a good answer...I think mostly it ranges from 4 times the size of Earth to slightly smaller than Jupiter.



Another good question, I guess that depends on what kind of disruption we are looking at. But anything the size of 4xEarth and upwards would destroy the orbits if it was flying from the outer skirts of the solar system inwards to pass close by the sun..



Gravity.



Oh bugger, I kept it alive wink2.gif

Cheers,
Badeskov

Edited for typo.



Cheers Badeskov
Now before I get jumped on i'm not in the believers camp here and I try to keep an open mind, now I realise that gravity would have a part to play if a largish planet entered our solar system, but would it have sufficient gravitational pull to rip the other planets from their orbits? that's assuming that the planet gets close enough, what if it had a different orbit and swung round the sun at a 90 degree angle to the rest of the planets?...................................................... Why am I carrying this on??????????????????? my head hurts.
bee
QUOTE (badeskov @ Mar 23 2008, 08:25 PM) *
Obviously. nothing to do with Nibiru whatsoever. Then someone will counter that of course the Government would not put Nibiru on the web page, but rather some odd phenomena like dark energy.


I'm not sure if it's 'Nibiru' or not.....but how YOU can be SO sure it ISN'T is odd.

And, yes....if it's a major secret...no-one's going to advertise it's POSSIBLE existence.
But the South Pole Telescope probably has a whole lot of things they want to look at...
and 'dark matter' is going to be one of them.

QUOTE
Oh, and by the way, Anarctica would decidedly be the wrong place to put a telescope looking for a planet like Nibiru...


why's that? Where do you suggest they should put it? original.gif


The quote below is from WASHINGTON POST


QUOTE
Washington Post
Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered, a front page story
31-Dec-1983

A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite. So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through. "All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is," Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief scientist for California's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Institute of Technology said in an interview.

The most fascinating explanation of this mystery body, which is so cold it casts no light and has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space, is that it is a giant gaseous planet, as large as Jupiter and as close to Earth as 50 billion miles. While that may seem like a great distance in earthbound terms, it is a stone's throw in cosmological terms, so close in fact that it would be the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the outermost planet Pluto. "If it is really that close, it would be a part of our solar system," said Dr. James Houck of Cornell University's Center for Radio Physics and Space Research and a member of the IRAS science team. "If it is that close, I don't know how the world's planetary scientists would even begin to classify it."

The mystery body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the northern sky from last January to November, when the satellite ran out of the supercold helium that allowed its telescope to see the coldest bodies in the heavens. The second observation took place six months after the first and suggested the mystery body had not moved from its spot in the sky near the western edge of the constellation Orion in that time. "This suggests it's not a comet because a comet would not be as large as the one we've observed and a comet would probably have moved," Houck said. "A planet may have moved if it were as close as 50 billion miles but it could still be a more distant planet and not have moved in six months time.



PS. I'm not in the 'believers camp'......either......I'm in the 'don't dismiss ANYTHING lightly camp'....and the
'don't be side-tracked by serial de-bunkers....camp' tongue.gif




anarkhy
Planet X and Sumerian Tales

Researchers Jason Martell and Erik Poltorak (Parker) shared their expertise in Sumerian history, ET visitations and modern and ancient reports of Planet X. Appearing in the 2nd hour, Martell noted the recent findings of Japanese astronomers at Kobe University who have posited that an Earth-sized 'Planet X' could be moving through our solar system on a highly elliptical orbit. Martell also discussed the 'Nemesis' theory which suggests that a Planet X orbits a second sun (a failed star or Brown dwarf) and may dislodge comets and send them towards Earth.

The ancient Sumerians knew about Planet X and described it as a "red glowing planet," whose inhabitants came to Earth to mine gold to repair their dwindling atmosphere, said Martell, summarizing the work of Zecharia Sitchin. The webmaster of Sitchin's website, Erik Poltorak joined the show in the 3rd hour. He discussed stories from ancient Sumerian tablets, which were copied, borrowed, and reinterpreted across cultures, including being used in the Bible. For instance, the Sumerians described "Adamu" as the first man, created by Enki (a ruler from Nibiru or Planet X).

There is evidence that our solar system has been bombarded by Nibiru's many passages through it, Poltarak stated. He and Martell took calls from listeners during the last hour.



http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4086602/Coast....Mar.17.2008-zug


anarkhy

Did not listened to the show yet, was looking for some C2C programs to listen in my mp3 and found this one. Might interest someone.

Hope those f**** reptilians dont like white flesh... wink2.gif



bee
QUOTE (anarkhy @ Mar 23 2008, 10:32 PM) *
[Martell also discussed the 'Nemesis' theory which suggests that a Planet X orbits a second sun (a failed star or Brown dwarf)


That's a new one to consider.....(for me)..... thumbsup.gif


QUOTE
The ancient Sumerians knew about Planet X and described it as a "red glowing planet," whose inhabitants came to Earth to mine gold to repair their dwindling atmosphere,


Well if it was a 'failed star or Brown Dwarf' they were orbiting.......you can see how they

could be in a spot of bother..... yes.gif
Lilly
QUOTE (bee @ Mar 23 2008, 10:38 PM) *
I'm not sure if it's 'Nibiru' or not.....but how YOU can be SO sure it ISN'T is odd.


Actually, it's not odd at all. You see, if there were a planetary body the reported size of Nibiru tooling about our solar system the affects of said 'mystery planet' would be more than a little obvious (ie, everyone would know). The orbits of all the other planets in our system would be affected...and quite obviously so.





Leonardo
QUOTE (bee @ Mar 23 2008, 10:48 PM) *
Well if it was a 'failed star or Brown Dwarf' they were orbiting.......you can see how they

could be in a spot of bother..... yes.gif


With all due respect, bee, but if 'Nibiru' orbited a failed star or Brown Dwarf it would hardly be a planet conducive for life to begin on, let alone evolve into baby-munching, super-lizards. As for the theory that these lizards could live on Nibiru, does ectothermy have any bearing on this (a failed star or Brown Dwarf isn't the most luminous/radiative body in the universe)?

Granted, these super-lizards could live in nuclear-radiated shelters now, but how would they have evolved to super-lizard-dom in the first place? If they evolved here on Earth then why are we here?
Sporkling
Nirabu is real.
Cradle of Fish
QUOTE (Diedtrying @ Mar 23 2008, 06:49 PM) *
What size is this? and what size body would you need to disrupt the planets? and can you explain why
it would disrupt the planets orbits.


Well I've heard that the planet is meant to be as big as Jupiter, if not bigger. Jupiter dominates it's neighborhood with it's immense gravity. If a body anywhere near that size came close to Earth even once (and it probably would many times in billions of years of planetary orbits) it would have tugged Earth off it's orbit. A system with a planet such as Nibiru would likely have no inner planets.



QUOTE (Diedtrying @ Mar 23 2008, 10:30 PM) *
Cheers Badeskov
Now before I get jumped on i'm not in the believers camp here and I try to keep an open mind, now I realise that gravity would have a part to play if a largish planet entered our solar system, but would it have sufficient gravitational pull to rip the other planets from their orbits? that's assuming that the planet gets close enough, what if it had a different orbit and swung round the sun at a 90 degree angle to the rest of the planets?...................................................... Why am I carrying this on??????????????????? my head hurts.


There isn't really anything wrong with being a believer, it's just Nibiru as it's described does not and can not exist. I mean, reptiles mining earth for gold dust for their atmosphere? Gold is one of the heaviest naturally occuring elements, how is it meant to stay up there?
Evangium
QUOTE (Leonardo @ Mar 24 2008, 09:40 AM) *
With all due respect, bee, but if 'Nibiru' orbited a failed star or Brown Dwarf it would hardly be a planet conducive for life to begin on, let alone evolve into baby-munching, super-lizards. As for the theory that these lizards could live on Nibiru, does ectothermy have any bearing on this (a failed star or Brown Dwarf isn't the most luminous/radiative body in the universe)?

Granted, these super-lizards could live in nuclear-radiated shelters now, but how would they have evolved to super-lizard-dom in the first place? If they evolved here on Earth then why are we here?

Hmmm... a brown star? What else do we know of that's brown? And given that those who partake of it also claim that it increases and amplifies neurological function... Further proof of the Marmitites and their vile plan to smear the universe with their abhorrent yeasty breakfast spread... tongue.gif
nara
disgust.gif All generations have their apacolipses(did I spell that right?). PLus, yes, we would have detected it by now.
badeskov
QUOTE (Diedtrying @ Mar 23 2008, 02:30 PM) *
Cheers Badeskov
Now before I get jumped on i'm not in the believers camp here and I try to keep an open mind, now I realise that gravity would have a part to play if a largish planet entered our solar system, but would it have sufficient gravitational pull to rip the other planets from their orbits? that's assuming that the planet gets close enough, what if it had a different orbit and swung round the sun at a 90 degree angle to the rest of the planets?...................................................... Why am I carrying this on??????????????????? my head hurts.


Hi...

Gravity is the main factor and would play a huge role. We can detect the wobbling in the inner planetary orbits due to the Jovian planets, which are a quite a way out...if something as big as planet Nibiru was roaming the inner parts of the Solar system, things would get rather nasty for us wink2.gif If the Earth was "hiding" behind the sun at that particular time, the effect would be less, but still very evident.

Cheers,
Badeskov
brothers
QUOTE (carpost @ Mar 23 2008, 04:15 AM) *
who believes in nibiru? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesn't exist.

And you cannot prove that it does exist. Looks like you just would like an argument and I will not give you one. tongue.gif
jaylemurph
QUOTE (bee @ Mar 23 2008, 03:04 PM) *
I'm gob-smacked that this Nibiru business MIGHT turn out to be true!!!


...Can we just taken as given that I make some comment along the lines of "I'd be gob-smacked at stuff, too, if..."

QUOTE (Cradle of Fish @ Mar 24 2008, 01:47 AM) *
Well I've heard that the planet is meant to be as big as Jupiter, if not bigger. Jupiter dominates it's neighborhood with it's immense gravity. If a body anywhere near that size came close to Earth even once (and it probably would many times in billions of years of planetary orbits) it would have tugged Earth off it's orbit. A system with a planet such as Nibiru would likely have no inner planets.


Old Master Sitchin suggests it's four to five times bigger than Jupiter. Bigger. Than Jupiter.

QUOTE
There isn't really anything wrong with being a believer, it's just Nibiru as it's described does not and can not exist. I mean, reptiles mining earth for gold dust for their atmosphere? Gold is one of the heaviest naturally occuring elements, how is it meant to stay up there?


Let's get our, uhh.... "facts" straight here. If we're talking about Nibiru, then we're specifically talking about the abode of the Monkey-Raping gods the Annunaki. Sitchin never suggests they're reptiles. They live on a magic planet, free of the (literally, in their case) crushing physical constraints of gravity or the need for heat (and consequently, of water, air or food) that travels around the universe? galaxy? solar system? on its own, ignoring the delicate balance of the other celestial bodies in its wake. Every 36,000 years.

Cradle is quite right, though, that these people did come specifically to Earth to mine our gold. To save their atmosphere, which -- contrary to everything we know about physics -- didn't freeze out in the cold wastes of intra/inter/galactic/universal space. And the gold is going to be in a magic dust form that never sinks and this (with no further elucidation from Sitchin) is going to save their planet.

Nope, that all sounds completely reasonable to me. Magic, super-humans, all from a trained economist.

--Jaylemurph
badeskov
QUOTE (bee @ Mar 23 2008, 02:38 PM) *
I'm not sure if it's 'Nibiru' or not.....but how YOU can be SO sure it ISN'T is odd.


Uhm, from basic physics. Sure, from a quantum mechanical point of view, I cannot be sure that it isn't suddenly going to materialize, albeit that the odd for that is infinitely small. We just know that it isn't there now, as we would have detected the gravitational effects. It is actually rather simple physics that illustrate this.

QUOTE
And, yes....if it's a major secret...no-one's going to advertise it's POSSIBLE existence.
But the South Pole Telescope probably has a whole lot of things they want to look at...
and 'dark matter' is going to be one of them.


Yes, dark matter is the main thing they are going to be looking at. And it will be very public when what is being studied due to that it is a consortium running the facility. There won't be any "holes" in the in list of studies. But even if they managed to do so, they would not be able to perform a continuous study, which obviously would be desired - and using that facility would be an overkill as a planet the size of Nibiru one should be able to spot using an 8 inch telescope purchased in a hobby store...

QUOTE
why's that? Where do you suggest they should put it? original.gif


Uhm, around the equator. That would fit a lot better with the alleged plane of Nibiru compared to that of Earth.

QUOTE
PS. I'm not in the 'believers camp'......either......I'm in the 'don't dismiss ANYTHING lightly camp'....and the
'don't be side-tracked by serial de-bunkers....camp' tongue.gif


Good, always be skeptical of what you hear and read wink2.gif

Cheers,
Badeskov
bee


Dotting around the internet re. this subject....there's lots of information....I read somewhere
but can't find the link at the mo.....that a theory is that our sun has a twin.....that most (all?)
solar systems are binary.....that the 'incoming' planet/comet cluster/brown dwarf could be
orbiting the 'second sun' and periodically crossing our part of the solar system.

Or 'switching' the sun that it orbits.....due to different gravitational pulls/distance of orbit....?
Not sure about this one....what-ever.....all this is taking place a LONG way away...but can
nevertheless (it is said) have dramatic affects on the planets in our solar system and on our own dear Earth!
Apparently 'things' ARE happening to our solar system.....for example.....global warming is said
to be taking place not just here....but on all the other planets.....?

This site HERE has some
things to say.....I presume you guys from America will know this person....Marshall Masters.

He says....
QUOTE
Follow The Money
When you follow the money, you see that our governments are taking this threat seriously. They’re spending immense sums to understand and cope with this threat. They are doing the right things, and at the right time. When you see the facts for yourself, the truth of it becomes unavoidable.


Cradle of Fish
QUOTE (bee @ Mar 25 2008, 10:46 AM) *
Dotting around the internet re. this subject....there's lots of information....I read somewhere
but can't find the link at the mo.....that a theory is that our sun has a twin.....that most (all?)
solar systems are binary.....that the 'incoming' planet/comet cluster/brown dwarf could be
orbiting the 'second sun' and periodically crossing our part of the solar system.

Or 'switching' the sun that it orbits.....due to different gravitational pulls/distance of orbit....?
Not sure about this one....what-ever.....all this is taking place a LONG way away...but can
nevertheless (it is said) have dramatic affects on the planets in our solar system and on our own dear Earth!
Apparently 'things' ARE happening to our solar system.....for example.....global warming is said
to be taking place not just here....but on all the other planets.....?

This site HERE has some
things to say.....I presume you guys from America will know this person....Marshall Masters.

He says....


You're talking about the Nemesis theory I think. Sure, alot of stars are part of a binary system, but not all. If our solar system was a binary system we'd likely easily see the second star, it would just be another heavenly body to us. The nemesis theory suggests that our sun has a brown dwarf companion that comes close to the Oort cloud every 25-30 million years, sending a barage of comets into the inner solar system. This Nemesis likely doesn't come within the Oort Cloud, which is basically the most outer limit of the solar system so it wouldn't come close enough to affect us directly. If it sends comets our way, it's a different story however.

As for switching orbits, it's impossible. An object with enough mass to 'steal' Earth from the suns orbit would have to be a very massive star, which we'd see eons before it even came anywhere near us.
sora_1
what is the brown dwarf,brown star huh.gif ??
Can anyone give me some information?? original.gif

Is there any official statement about Nibiru??
bee
QUOTE (Cradle of Fish @ Mar 25 2008, 02:30 PM) *
As for switching orbits, it's impossible. An object with enough mass to 'steal' Earth from the suns orbit would have to be a very massive star, which we'd see eons before it even came anywhere near us.


I didn't mean that the Earth would be 'stolen'......one site I looked at....but can't find now.....said that
the 'incoming' what-ever-it-is might be orbiting around the 'other sun' in our system....but that when it
gets near(ish) to our sun's gravitational pull...it could switch... to going round THIS sun....then at some
point switch back again.....(few thousand years later?)

I'm not sure of the merit of this theory....just mentioned it....as is IS another thing to maybe consider....?


QUOTE (sora_1 @ Mar 25 2008, 02:48 PM) *
what is the brown dwarf,brown star huh.gif ??
Can anyone give me some information?? original.gif

Is there any official statement about Nibiru??


Hi there......do a search for info about 'brown dwarf star'....there's lots about it..... thumbsup.gif

There is no 'official' statement, to my knowledge, about Nibiru.....but in 1983 a 'mysterious planetary
body' was spotted and made front page news......I quoted the Washington Post.....a few posts back.
Cradle of Fish
QUOTE (sora_1 @ Mar 25 2008, 02:48 PM) *
what is the brown dwarf,brown star huh.gif ??
Can anyone give me some information?? original.gif

Is there any official statement about Nibiru??


A brown dwarf is like a failed star. It's a body with a mass at least ten times that of Jupiter, yet it's still not massive or dense enough to start nuclear fusion, so what you end up with is a small brown cloudly body thats still fairly hot but doesn't give off much heat or light.
Shadow09
QUOTE (Bender. @ Mar 23 2008, 07:37 AM) *
who believes in chocolate coke? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.



Chocolate coke does exist. Chocolate/cherry flavored dr pepper anyway. I've seen the commercials. original.gif
Dragons2
whats nibiru? hmm.gif
Cradle of Fish
QUOTE (jaylemurph @ Mar 25 2008, 03:44 AM) *
...Can we just taken as given that I make some comment along the lines of "I'd be gob-smacked at stuff, too, if..."



Old Master Sitchin suggests it's four to five times bigger than Jupiter. Bigger. Than Jupiter.



Let's get our, uhh.... "facts" straight here. If we're talking about Nibiru, then we're specifically talking about the abode of the Monkey-Raping gods the Annunaki. Sitchin never suggests they're reptiles. They live on a magic planet, free of the (literally, in their case) crushing physical constraints of gravity or the need for heat (and consequently, of water, air or food) that travels around the universe? galaxy? solar system? on its own, ignoring the delicate balance of the other celestial bodies in its wake. Every 36,000 years.

Cradle is quite right, though, that these people did come specifically to Earth to mine our gold. To save their atmosphere, which -- contrary to everything we know about physics -- didn't freeze out in the cold wastes of intra/inter/galactic/universal space. And the gold is going to be in a magic dust form that never sinks and this (with no further elucidation from Sitchin) is going to save their planet.

Nope, that all sounds completely reasonable to me. Magic, super-humans, all from a trained economist.

--Jaylemurph


Forgive me, I know Stichen likes to change his facts around alot. When I read about him about 5 or so years ago he claimed the last coming of Nibiru was in 1AD and it was the star of bethlehem, now I hear that it's next coming is due in 2012(to cash in on the hype no doubt). If the orbit is still right(3600 years), then he was either off the first time by 16 centuries or he's simply making it all up.

Of course, there are so many more questions raised than answered. I've heard that it's larger than Jupiter, I've also heard that it's larger than Jupiter and a solid planet rather than a gas giant. If such a massive planet WAS formed in the solar system, why didn't it fix itself in a fairly consistent orbit like all the other planets? The bodies with the really eliptical orbits are generally tiny dwarf planets and planetoids like Pluto and Sedna. It couldn't have formed too far out, because alot of the matter that formed planets was at the distance that the gas giants are at, and if it did somehow manage to form past the orbit of Neptune, wouldnt there be alot less Kuiper Belt objects?

I hate to use the word impossible, but there are SO many things wrong with the nibiru stories that we can pretty much rule it out.
jaylemurph
QUOTE (Cradle of Fish @ Mar 25 2008, 08:30 PM) *
Forgive me, I know Stichen likes to change his facts around alot. When I read about him about 5 or so years ago he claimed the last coming of Nibiru was in 1AD and it was the star of bethlehem, now I hear that it's next coming is due in 2012(to cash in on the hype no doubt). If the orbit is still right(3600 years), then he was either off the first time by 16 centuries or he's simply making it all up.

Of course, there are so many more questions raised than answered. I've heard that it's larger than Jupiter, I've also heard that it's larger than Jupiter and a solid planet rather than a gas giant. If such a massive planet WAS formed in the solar system, why didn't it fix itself in a fairly consistent orbit like all the other planets? The bodies with the really eliptical orbits are generally tiny dwarf planets and planetoids like Pluto and Sedna. It couldn't have formed too far out, because alot of the matter that formed planets was at the distance that the gas giants are at, and if it did somehow manage to form past the orbit of Neptune, wouldnt there be alot less Kuiper Belt objects?

I hate to use the word impossible, but there are SO many things wrong with the nibiru stories that we can pretty much rule it out.


You're quite right about Sitchin changing his story on a regular basis: his current prediction for Nibiru's return has been upped to c.2065, so it's conveniently past any reasonable point in his lifetime now. He is pretty consistent about it being a solid planet 4 to 5 times the size of Jupiter; it was (he says) originally formed as the fifth planet from the sun, but was knocked out of its orbit.

Quite frankly, since he's a economist, it make sense to me his physics and astronomy should be at least as wonky as his "history" and "translation". Still, who am I to knock him? He's completely successful bilking artist and can get people to either forget or ignore basic physics.

--Jaylemurph
badeskov
QUOTE (jaylemurph @ Mar 25 2008, 07:31 PM) *
You're quite right about Sitchin changing his story on a regular basis: his current prediction for Nibiru's return has been upped to c.2065, so it's conveniently past any reasonable point in his lifetime now. He is pretty consistent about it being a solid planet 4 to 5 times the size of Jupiter; it was (he says) originally formed as the fifth planet from the sun, but was knocked out of its orbit.


Hmm, I would love to see what could knock a planet of that size so far out of it's orbit...on the other hand, no, I don't think I'd like to see that wink2.gif

Cheers,
Badeskov
bee
The below quote is from HERE



There are some rather interesting pictures on this site (+lots more).....make of them (the pictures) what you will.....?



QUOTE
Why Don't We See It?

If we accept that NASA knows about Planet X but will not tell us
because of national security issues, what about the amateur
astronomers and institutions of other countries who are not
restricted in that way? Why are they not reporting Planet X? The
problem, according to McCanney, is that PX's lack of brightness and
position make it hard to see. Its current location makes it visible
only in the Spring, rather than all year round.


But even then you have to be on the right place on earth because of
PX's skewed elliptical orbit. McCanney claims that it actually
approaches our solar system from below the ecliptic (plane of the
planets' orbits) meaning the best viewing is from the Southern
Hemisphere which is mostly water and less densely populated. McCanney
comments on this in writing about the above Harrington abstract:
In 1991 Robert S. Harrington, head of the Naval Observatory,
Washington, D.C. wrote an internal Abstract which culminated over a
decade of theoretical and observational astronomy with a team of
experts. He was in charge of the NASA directed search for a large
planet at the edge of our solar system that had been perturbing the
orbits of the outer planets. Many previous attempts had been made,
all leading to incorrect results ... but this time Harrington was
certain that he had found the location of the large rogue planet.



Part of the discovery of Planet X was based on the fact the outer
large planets Uranus and Neptune were being pulled DOWN in their
orbits. No other effect could cause such a change in the orbits of
these planets except the existence of a very large previously
undiscovered celestial object which had to exist down and in the
direction of the unexplainable motions of these outer giant planets.
Harrington knew that it had to be BIG and it had to be
down below the plane of the planets (the ecliptic). He also knew that
since it had not been there before that it must be a new body
entering the solar system.






Cradle of Fish
I'm sorry bee, I cant take seriously a website that claims NASA is lying to us and dips into bible prophecy.

It also makes the claim that it can be seen next to or behind the sun, but if that were true we'd be able to see it easily for 3 of the 4 seasons.
bee
QUOTE (Cradle of Fish @ Mar 26 2008, 09:28 PM) *
It also makes the claim that it can be seen next to or behind the sun, but if that were true we'd be able to see it easily for 3 of the 4 seasons.


Not necessarily......they did say that the Southern Hemisphere was the best place to
see it......and IF it is a brown dwarf type thing....it might be hard to see anyway..
without good equipment. (until it gets closer perhaps...??? not sure about that..))

So what did you think about the picture that they said had been photoshopped by NASA?

And the other photos showing SOMETHING beside the sun?

I'm keeping an open mind about them.....but I WOULD like to hear what you think
about them.

Oh....and it can't be seen BEHIND the sun.....that would be impossible...?


muddpuppy
QUOTE (carpost @ Mar 23 2008, 05:15 AM) *
who believes in nibiru? can it be real. theres always a chance that it might exist. i know that even if u disagree, theres no way u can prove that it doesnt exist.

yes its real!! Whether or not its an earth ending phenomenom is still up for debate. Scientists/astronomers have detected a large mass in the far reaches of our solar system. Basically its a big lifeless asteroid and cant really be considered a planet per say. IMO its floating junk
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.