QUOTE (~Kaizen CJM~ @ May 5 2008, 12:51 AM)

You make it sound like Catholics want African people to just have unprotected sex and spread AIDS. You don't seem to mention at all that they teach the safest option (abstinence and refraining from sex before marriage) as opposed to an option which would increase sexual addicition, rape, pregnancy, and the spread of disease.
I'm sure you would have mentioned increased unwanted pregnancies, because I would think that once you get married and then have sex, then that would increase pregnancy.
Although, how does marriage and saved sex prevent rape, sexual addiction and the spread of disease? There could be those who came into the marriage virgin, become sexually addicted, and have that wreck the marriage! Rape prevented by marriage, saving sex until marriage? How? Wasn't there marital rape, and nothing was done about it? And marriage cannot assure you wont spread of disease, I assuming you mean STD's. One could bring it in and give it to the other. How can you be assured you are teaching everyone these skills?
QUOTE
If you teach people that "it's ok to have as much sex as you want as long as you have condoms" you will increase sex addiction which would increase higher rates of of sexual assualt and rape due to addicted-uncontrollable-sex crazed-horny-teens who couldn't help themselve and didn't have a condom on them.
I'm curious, how do you see that others are teaching everyone to have as much sex as they want? I don't know if you are doing it, but I do so many in the media and close to me, assuming that once there are condoms handy, that it's inviting everyone to have as much sex as they want! Did anyone even thing that those who use them, are actually being just as responsible? Aren't people insulting the intelligence on how they are responsible? Makes me think, that some people assume, there is little print on condom packages that say, 'you have a condom! Go jump anything that moves!'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE (~Kaizen CJM~ @ May 5 2008, 09:48 AM)

Let's Imagine for a moment:
Your a person who is having sex (unprotected) and you dont' want to get a disease.
I say, "You can avoid getting a disease!"
You say, "Really? How?"
I say, "You can stop having sex and wait till you're married!"
You say, "Nope sorry, I'm just an animal and I would rather follow my natural impulses and keep on having sex!"
I say, "Alright, to each his own."
You end up getting a disease a few days later.
You come to me and say "Why didn't you tell me I could have sex with condoms!?! Now I have AIDS!"
Now, in that situation, who's fault is it that you got AIDS? If you want to behave like an animal, and don't want to take the advice given to you, than it's your own fault if you get an STD and die. Live like an animal, die like an animal.
In the case of this girl who died, it's the same thing. The family wanted to live like animals and not take advice from family members or go to a doctor. I would presume that the girl also believed as her parents and did not seek medical attention because last I checked 11-year old girls were perfectly capable of calling the police. The concept is the same, and yet you condemn the family for what they have done. After all, they're just animals.
I personally do not like to say anything about humans being just like animals, and I see all animals being different from each other, but that is just me. But, what if someone who saved sex until marriage, and came to you and said, that still got a STD? Like I mentioned earlier in this post, marriage is not fool proof against that. Are they still behaving like animals?