QUOTE (Rock Slinger @ Apr 4 2008, 09:05 AM)

The folowing website claims a massive conspiracy on cancer cures. I'd like us to use this thread to try and prove or disprove it's premise.
http://cancertutor.com/Other/NoCancer.htmlIt is extensive, but very imformative. If you keep reading through Intro Part 1 and Part 2, the author presents the most compelling case for a true conspiracy.
QUOTE
Sorry to have just cut and pasted this here, but since no one has responded, I wondered if people didn't find it an interesting conspiracy enough
Rock...
I think you're onto something here.
I'm not sure why you haven't gotten any responses yet, but I have an idea...
I think it might be that people look at this and think to themselves, "Well, that's just poppycock. This goes against conventional wisdom on the subject...everything I've ever heard or been told, by family, friends, WebMD, or my doctor for chrissakes. It's just bull."
There's a reason for that feeling.
I have a hard time classifying it as a real conspiracy myself, as generally speaking, a conspiracy involves a small group of people hiding things with absolute secrecy from the masses. This situation which your link descibes, and which by the way is true as pertains to what it presents, doesn't actually involve hidden information that's just recently been discovered. What it involves is information which has been available for public consumption, and available for anyone to try...for a very long time, but which has been suppressed by medical officialdom and conditioning that we've all received since we were old enough to understand.
In a manner of speaking, I suppose one could call it a form of conspiracy, but I've always looked at the pooh-poohing of "alternative" medicine, and the adherence by the medical establishment, and the cooperation of the media in that effort, as a carefully contrived mechanism to re-inforce people's lack of self-reliance.
One would be tempted to accuse the entire medical establishment of some huge conspiracy in this matter. I can certainly understand that. But it is highly complex and multi-leveled.
I don't think you can bang the entire medical and drug profession accross the board. Certain drugs are indeed beneficial, and there are alot of people involved in the field who are genunely interested in helping folks, and there are many drugs which can and do help people.
However, there are indeed many more drugs which do more harm than good---which feed the quick-fix mentality of modern man, and which are in fact dangerous, and there is a certain group of medical procedures which are touted as being state of the art, but which are actually barbaric and ineffective.
Both situations exist in concert today, which is what makes the situation so complex. The "certain group" of medical procedures and drugs to which I speak just so happen to be the most financially lucrative for the medical profession today: the "treatment", as it were of degenerative disease.
In that I am speaking of primarily heart disease and cancer.
The conditioning, which has been supported by the media for a long time, paints the doctor as a white coated god who knows all, and is always right. This has been ingrained in most people to an extent that is unbelievable for years and years. TV shows, even the most implausible and fantastic (like "House", for instance, which portrays a doctor who wouldn't be able to practice medicine anywhere in the United States, and who likely would be in jail), constantly re-enforce this paradigm of thought and acceptance.
The fact is, "alternative" treatments, which actually do something, are and have been available for a very long time for the vast majority of things that we simply don't accept.
How many people who have heart disease would actually be willing to undergo alternative treatments for their clogged arteries, or for their cancer, when their doctor tells them there's only one chance...angioplastry or by pass surgery; or chemotherapy, radiation and surgery for their tumor?
Not a heck of alot.
This is due to conditioning. Despite the obvious evidence that shows that bypass surgery and angioplasy don't work beyond the short term, and that the majority of people who die of cancer actually die of the after-effects of their treatment (trust me, I've seen a friend or two die of "cancer" who had no cancer in their bodies at the time of their deaths-- they died from their destroyed immune systems and weakened bodies from the butchery they underwent for a period of years) , people simply don't want to accept "alternatives" (which are really not alternatives, but existed long before allopathic medicine advanced to its present level).
Is there a decisive program in place to fortify this conditioning?
Yes, absolutely, and it has a great deal to do with what your link points to.
Do I think it's a conspiracy in the purest sense of the word?
No...although I can completely understand where that idea comes from.
I prefer to think of it as a reflection of people's acceptance of conditioning they've received since they were children. It's so pervasive and ingrained that people have lost their innate sense of self-reliance and ability to think and feel for themselves. The government helps this process along, most certainly (There's a reason why "natural" and "alternative" treatments don't get studied and approved by the FDA...because you can't patent as proprietary any naturally occurring substance...and regulations are in place...highly restrictive ones, which state that you cannot claim any natural substance can be used to cure any disease...despite the fact that they can and do cure diseases).
There are "alternative" things available out there.
The "establishment", as-it-were would prefer you thought it was all baloney, granted.
But the fact that the information is readily available, and testable for anyone who would wish to do so (and tens of thousands have done so, effectively) leads me to the conclusion that it's not so much a conspiracy as it is a carefully contrived media campaign to suck people into the common paradigm and make them accepting, conforming sheep as regards that paradigm.
In other words, no one's hiding anything from the discerning person...they're masking it through conditioning.
If it were an actual conspiracy, I think that most people would know absolutely nothing about it.
In your quote from the link it says, "Why you haven't heard these things before?"
I think many have indeed heard them.
The real question is, why don't people actually dig into these matters and study the truth surrounding them more than they do?
I think the answer is obvious...