Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Clearing Misconceptions About Islam.
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Spirituality vs Skepticism
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
tetisheri
While I am waiting for Ozi's or A Fighter's response to my questions / comments in posts 421 & 443, I would like to add a new question. What is your opinion about Turkey's efforts to revise Hadith, as mentioned in the BBC site quoted by Sean?


QUOTE
The "powerful Department of Religious Affairs has commissioned a team of theologians at Ankara University to carry out a fundamental revision of the Hadith, the second most sacred text in Islam after the Koran." at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7264903.stm


IMO this revision is a courageous step towards re-opening the door of "ijtihad" & will help resolve some urgent issues . There are some hadiths which contradict the spirit or letter of the quran. For example hadith n° 1237 in Bukhari's book "al Jana'ez" :

QUOTE
البخاري في كتاب الجنائز ، قال : " حدثنا موسى بن اسماعيل حدثنا بن ميمون حدثنا واصل الأحدب عن المعرور بن سويد عن أبي ذر رضى الله عنه ، قال : قال رسول الله (ص) : "أتاني آت من ربي فأخبرني – أو قال بشرني – أنه من قال من أمتى لا أشرك بالله شيئاً دخل الجنة ، قلت و إن زنى و إن سرق ؟ قال و إن زني و إن سرق ، قلت و إن زنى و إن سرق ، قال و إن زني و إن سرق ، قلت و إن زني و إن سرق ، قال و إن زنى و إن سرق رغم أنف أبي ذر / الحديث 1237


In this hadith, Abi Dhar cited the Prophet saying that whoever , from the muslim 'umma , proclaimed that he will not commit "shirk" ( ascribing partners to, or worshiping any beside, Allah), will enter paradise. Abi Dhar asked the Prophet :"even if he commits adultry or stole?" the Prophet replied :" even if he commits adultry or stole". Abi Dhar asked the question thrice & was given the same answer thrice. According to this hadith, adultery & theft will be disregarded by Allah in exchange for a proclamation of faith. Why then does the quran & the accepted shari'a forbid & impose penalties on these crimes even on practicing muslims? There is a contradiction here! How could believers & followers of the Prophet claim that he condoned adultery & theft ? This example is important because hadiths establish the traditions which explain Islam & inform muslims how to live their lives. The example of Turkey should be followed elsewhere.

Ozi seems to suspect that there is a conspiracy to impose a "watered down" western Islam on moslems. I do not believe that this is true. During the last decades there has been revivalistic movements in islam seeking the re-creation of a past golden age as a solution to present day problems; under the banner of " al islam howa al hal" ( Islam is the solution ) . Chief among these problems that of tradition vs modernity, cultural continuity vs change. Political & Economic pressures lead to an increasing sense of frustration. The inability to find immediate solutions leads to the idealization of the past; adopting a simplified world view which excludes the other by painting them in negative colors as "fornicators, drug users, corrupt ...etc" , therefore integration is rejected & the issue of change avoided. This can be taken to an almost paranoid extreme which views all others as enemies seeking the destruction of the umma & its religion. Validation is sought in miraculous " scientific" proofs, natural phenomena..etc. The problem is that it also leads to a form of ritualism when form & ritual become of utmost importance.

This 'malaise' could be a reason why Kosovo & Iraq arouse so much anger whereas Darfur does not, or why there were demonstrations threatening violence over a film, cartoon or teddy bear , while excuses will be found for taliban for example, or why the bloodshed in iraq by fellow muslims is glossed over. As a result, muslims are giving the world a whole set of confusing & conflicting signals , but are unable to see why the 'misconceptions' about islam persist, which in turn reinforces the image of being an island of righteousness in a sea of evil, or a victim of a tyrannical power bent on their destruction.

I have now come a full circle back to what I said in the first post, that it is crucial to re-open ijtihad & tafseer,so I will stop here. However, I am still interested in your input.
A-Fighter
QUOTE (capeo @ Apr 18 2008, 01:13 AM) *
Uh, who are you? Me and Ozi have gone round about a million times. You need not worry.
Uh... I created this thread? If you don't keep to the rules, the administrators will close this thread permanently, so I asked you not to use foul language anymore.

QUOTE (capeo @ Apr 18 2008, 01:13 AM) *
As for asking what your religion is about? I know what it's about, thanks.
You know what it is about? You don't even know when this religion was created and you want to come here and lecture us about what Islam really is? How can you call this a discussion?

QUOTE (capeo @ Apr 18 2008, 01:13 AM) *
LOL. You haven't stated a fact or proof since I've been in this thread. You and Ozi links are bogus apologetics websites made to supplicate you. You say outrageous things like there are no mathematical or scientific errors in the quran yet when faced with them you can't even answer for yourself. You run to precanned responses from your websites that a "normal" person like me sees right through. They're backtracking and excuses. You're the one who can't see the truth. If a passage has to be justified with trunications and context then how would that be divine? If a book were truly written by a creator then it would not be bound by context and history. It would not need excuses to cover up it's inconsistencies and sections of vile bloodshed. LOL. And I need to see the truth?
I have been here since the start of this discussion, for I was the one who created it. But you, you only came in at Post #345! Here is that same post:

QUOTE
Give me a break. It's no different than any other holy book. Written by man to brainwash man. And it seemed to work pretty good on you apparently as you can't even see all the ridiculous inconsistencies and contradictions in the Koran that have already been pointed out in this thread. No different than bible literalists. You share the common ability to stare reality in the face and not even see it.
See? The fist time you post something, and immediately you go into attack-mode! Take some time to properly organize some questions and put them forward... You have got no respect for any of us, so you can't expect us to give you some back (at least I am trying). Who are you to tell me that I don't post facts... I did not post them for you, but to the people that wanted a convincing answer to their questions. Maybe you should do the same?

QUOTE (capeo @ Apr 18 2008, 01:13 AM) *
Let me switch your story up to show you how vapid it is: And that makes as much sense as your little story.
This is heart-breaking. I am here to try and help you and you twist my words and make fun of it! What is wrong with you?! If you don't want to discuss like a human being, then go away and never come back. I suggest you clear your head and start respecting other members. I am not doing this to entertain myself, but to help those people that are interested...
A-Fighter
QUOTE (Doug1o29 @ Apr 18 2008, 03:32 PM) *
Let's apply that to Christianity. Observing what Christians do (especially the Crusaders) is not a fair way to judge Christians because many people do not know what their religion says. Thus, we can excuse barbaric behavior because the practioners are ignorant. Sorry, A-Fighter, it doesn't wash. You can't have it both ways: we either judge all people by what their religion says, or we judge all people by their actions.
You misunderstood what I said (I think). Imagine if a religion tells it's followers to support a beard. But if nobody in the whole world that follows that particular religion has got a beard, does that mean that the religion doesn't teach it's followers to support a beard? You get the point now? So that is the reason why you should examine the scriptures in great detail.

QUOTE (Doug1o29 @ Apr 18 2008, 03:32 PM) *
I'm waiting for al Jezeera to say it; they're the ones who came up with that line about the US destroying the Trade Center in the first place. I'm also waiting for some of the war-mongering mullahs in Iran and Iraq to say it.
No, they were not the one's who claimed that 9/11 was an inside-job. And besides, Aljazeera English is only 1 year old. War-mongering Mullahs? OK, let us imagine if the whole Muslim world denounced 9/11 (Believe me, 95+ percent already do), would it really make a difference? Me thinks not.

QUOTE (Doug1o29 @ Apr 18 2008, 03:32 PM) *
I have a Muslim friend and he speaks out against it (He's the guy I had a Michelob with a few nights ago. You remember - the one you or Ozi said was a bad Muslim because he drank alcohol.). There are some Muslim voices speaking out against the violence, but they are voices crying in the wilderness. Same as there are some Americans speaking out against the US invasion of Iraq, but again, we are voices in the wilderness.
This is exactly the point I am trying to make. If the Media is against you, you can't expect to have a voice that can be heard in the Western world. You can count the number of people that truly praise 9/11 using 1 hand only! (Exaggeration taking place :D). The Americans are controlling the media, and they only tell us the story from their point of view (Even Al-Jazeera English).

QUOTE (Doug1o29 @ Apr 18 2008, 03:32 PM) *
Just a few random thoughts:
Muhammed died in 632, closing the Quran. Only 28 years later, the Umayyad Caliphate began an expansion that over only 90 years resulted in it ruling the world's fifth largest empire (third largest based on contiguous land mass and third largest by population (29.5% of the world's people)). Its religion was Islam. The method was conquest. This is the reason that Islam spread through northern Africa, Spain and much of the Near East. Whether or not Islam advocates spreading its faith by the sword, that's what these true believers did. So, Islam was much more efficient at spreading its faith by the sword than was Christianity.

In Spain, the big news in 1492 had nothing to do with some globe-trotting mariner who thought he had found a way to India, but everything to do with the Reconquest of Granada from the Islamic Moors. The empire had ruled for 832 years. One single building never fell to the Christians and today remains the sole surviving Islamic stronghold in Spain: the Alhambra. The Reconquista began in 722 with the Battle of Covadonga and ended 770 years later.

In India, the Islamic conquest of India in 1000 AD under Mahmud Ghaznavi was probably the bloodiest war in history from the civilian point of view. Hindu princes fought plenty of wars, but war was carefully kept away from cities and civilians. The Islamic conquerors plundered local people, murdered Brahmins, killed cows, sacked and burned towns, violated women, destroyed temples, looted bodies of the dead and sold captives into slavery. They measured the success of a mission by the booty they stole. And it was all done in the name of jihad in the service of Allah and his Last Prophet, even though many of these acts are outlawed by the Sunnah. This concept of war was entirely unknown its Hindu victims.
You shouldn't have posted this bit. There is no point in me trying to 'debunk' your information, so Please just forget about it. You and I and others already know how this might end...

QUOTE (Doug1o29 @ Apr 18 2008, 03:32 PM) *
So, both A-Fighter and Ozi have a point: much of what is blamed on Islam is actually Muslims acting in violtaion of their own law. I also recall that somewhere (Sunnah, I think) there is a statement that a person who commits certain violent acts (like rape and the murder of inoocents) is not a Muslim at the time he commits that act. This is a handy dodge: it gives Muslims a way to say that Muslims don't do these things. (Does that mean that I, as an agnostic, suddenly become a believer while committing an atrocious act?).
You are saying that if a Muslim commits a crime, then he is not considered a Muslim anymore, and so Muslims never commit any crimes? This is not true (to an extent). Who decides which people are true Muslims, Christians etc.? Me? You? No, it is Allah Almighty only. He is the only One who knows what is inside our hearts, and He is the One who will decide what will be that person's destiny in the afterlife.

Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon him) said: "He who has in his heart faith equal to a single grain of mustard seed will not enter Hell, and he who has in his heart as much arrogance as a grain of mustard seed will not enter Paradise."
Mainpoint
QUOTE (Doug1o29 @ Apr 18 2008, 03:32 PM) *
The Islamic conquerors , killed cows,


dontgetit.gif wacko.gif blink.gif hmm.gif w00t.gif rofl.gif laugh.gif original.gif

I researched on the net and found

"approxmialy 856 million cows are slaughtered every 8 months"

Why are you against muslims eating beef?
HAJiME
QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
I have LOADS of questions!

So, does Islam not teach that we (humans) were created in God's image?


How old is the Earth according to Islam? Or the entire universe? Any answers in the Qua'ran for these queries?

What differs about the creation story in Islam? How does Islam explain extinct creatures? Are they mentioned?

Someone posted something about the Qua'ran mentioning Atoms. What is "atom" in original Arabic and does it actually mean the exact same thing as English? My problem is, when this book was written, there wouldn't have been a word for what we now call an atom, because no one knew it existed - so I'm confused about the translation. How did God describe an Atom in human language to people who didn't know what it was. This is my issue with all of any religious text. It can't be translated, because as soon as you do that you're altering it.

Are there any foods Muslims cannot eat full stop? And what is the purpose of Halal?

Why isn't caffeine seen in the same way as alcohol... drugs, etc?

Is there anything medically that God forbids?

What does Islam think about transexuality? I question this since I know of the situation in Iran. It has the second highest population of transsexuals world wide - why do you think this is? Is this good or bad?

How does Islam explain natural disasters and medical coniditions? What is their purpose in this world?

Beckys_Mom
QUOTE (tetisheri @ Apr 18 2008, 09:38 PM) *
While I am waiting for Ozi's or A Fighter's response to my questions / comments in posts 421 & 443,


post 421 was posted a while back and as they both havent answered...I think maybe they just cant answer...for they both have been in and posted ver sinse and dodged the questions

its rude..but thats how it is
seanph
QUOTE
I researched on the net and found

"approxmialy 856 million cows are slaughtered every 8 months"

Why are you against muslims eating beef?


Okay guys! Now I'm hungry for a Big Mac! laugh.gif
seanph
QUOTE
Our links are proofs to answer your 'questions' and you treat them like trash. A normal person like me truly understands the links that Ozi is posting, and (again) you are the only one not wanting to see the truth.


Morning Capeo. The links that have been provided by our Muslims friends, are sources dedicated to apologetics--although they will claim otherwise. The way to fight this--at least in this discussion--is to simply do the same. Here is the rebuttal site to Islamic Awareness...

Answering Islam
http://www.answering-islam.org.uk/

This is a great site to refute any Muslim argument. Fight apologetics with apologetics. And if you're interested, here are numerous academic sites dedicated to Islamic Studies ...

History of Islam, History.Com
http://www.history.com/minisite.do?content...mp;mini_id=1077

Internet Islamic History Sourcebook, Fordham University
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/islam/islamsbook.html

Middle East Center: Modern Middle East Studies, University of Pennsylvania
http://mec.sas.upenn.edu/courses.html

Exploring Ancient Cultures: Early Islam, University of Evansville
http://eawc.evansville.edu/ispage.htm

ISLAM AND THE MUSLIM WORLD RESEARCH GUIDE, North Carolina State University
http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/guides/islam/webresources.html

Islam and Islamic Studies Resources: For Studying Islam and the Diverse Perspectives of Muslims, University of Georgia
http://www.uga.edu/islam/

USC-MSA COMPENDIUM OF MUSLIM TEXTS, University of Southern California
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/

Islam: Barbara R. von Schlegell (Visiting Associate Professor of Philosophy and Religion), Ursinus College
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~bvon/index.html

University of Cambridge Islamic Society
http://www.isoc.co.uk/

Religion and Ethics: BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/

Islam Links, University of Cambridge
http://www.divinity.cam.ac.uk/cip/links.php

Oxford Islamic Studies, University of Oxford
http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/Public...amp;failReason=

Near Eastern Studies, Princeton University
http://library.princeton.edu/catalogs/arti...hp?subjectID=60

Arabic and Islamic Studies, Harvard University
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/arab_islam.html

Program in Islamic Studies, Yale University
http://www.yale.edu/religiousstudies/fields/islamic.html

Islam, Washington State University
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/ISLAM/ISLAM.HTM

Middle East & Islamic Studies Collection, Cornell University
http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/

Islamic Resources, Washington State University
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/ISLAM/ISLAM.HTM

Islam in Comparative Context: Online Resources, University of Berkeley
http://orias.berkeley.edu/Islam.html

Middle Eastern Studies, The University of Texas at Austin
http://menic.utexas.edu/mes.html

Islamic Origins, University of Chicago
http://bcweb.bluefield.edu/danderson/islam...amicOrigins.htm

Islam: Virtual Resource Index, Rutgers University
http://virtualreligion.net/vri/islam.html

Islamic studies in Ph.D. Programs in Religious Studies, UNC
http://www.unc.edu/~cernst/reliprograms.htm

A beautiful statement if I must say so myself. Please read this in its entirety.

... The sooner we Muslims rehabilitate and mend our classical networks and institutions, and reconnect them with the rest of humanity in sincere and humble dialogue, the more able we will be to serve God and humanity. This “Common Word” is a great first step along the way.--In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful, The Promise of “A Common Word”, Aref Ali Nayed, October 2007

SOURCE: Cambridge Divinity
http://www.divinity.cam.ac.uk/cip/document...monWord_000.pdf

LECTURES ON DVD BY THE TEACHING COMPANY:

Great World Religions: Islam (12 lectures, 30 minutes/lecture) by John L. Esposito Georgetown University, Ph.D., Temple University
http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=6102

REVIEW: Harold McFarland, editor of Midwest Book Review, writes about this course: "This is easily the most accurate, even-handed, and thorough survey of Islam that I have seen to date. The extent of coverage, breadth, and depth of Professor Esposito's knowledge, recognition of the various groups and beliefs within Islam, and scholarly treatment of the subject makes this a very highly recommended lecture series and the only one on the subject that I could recommend to date."

Also, I'm reading a great text entiteld The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600-1800 by Professor Jonathan Berkey. Highly recommend. I have it in ebook form, making it easier/quicker to consult.

linked-image

The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600-1800
http://www.ebooks.com/ebooks/book_display.asp?IID=217403

Excerpt
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0521588138..._pt#reader-link

MK,

Sean
Beckys_Mom
QUOTE (seanph @ Apr 19 2008, 01:23 PM) *
Okay guys! Now I'm hungry for a Big Mac! laugh.gif

YUCK..what's wrong with a REAL beef burger../ steak burger?? 100% pure beef!! LOL not that McDonalds crap !!
seanph
All right, baby ... how about this from Hardee's ... All Angus Beef ...!

linked-image

or

linked-image

Will this puppy satisfy ... laugh.gif
Beckys_Mom
QUOTE (seanph @ Apr 19 2008, 03:24 PM) *
All right, baby ... how about this ... !

linked-image

Will this puppy satisfy ... laugh.gif

hmm not bad sean.but hold the cheese yuck.but most times I prefer good ole fashioned pork chops with apple..serve that in a bap and bobs your uncle LOL

or lamb LOL
seanph
Yummy! I'll take that! Man ... now I'm starved! Darn it Becky! grin2.gif
Ozi
QUOTE (Beckys_Mom @ Apr 19 2008, 11:36 AM) *
post 421 was posted a while back and as they both havent answered...I think maybe they just cant answer...for they both have been in and posted ver sinse and dodged the questions

its rude..but thats how it is


See, I dont respond for a couple of days and you all assume im out of answers, LOL. Me, i dont think so, most of you know this too. However, I have been observing post of others, especially Doug, Capeo and Sean. The latter doing the usual technique of making a post with hundreds of links, as though quantity matters and not the quality does not. All The universities listed, dont dispute the Textual integrity of the quran, only IW , AI do, using outdated material.

Howver those who I have not answered, I promise i will, you need to be a bit patient, i dont know if i will do it today or tomorrow. As I have a couple of soccer games to play and watch a game or two live at the stadiums. Its the weekend.


QUOTE (Beckys_Mom @ Apr 19 2008, 04:07 PM) *
YUCK..what's wrong with a REAL beef burger../ steak burger?? 100% pure beef!! LOL not that McDonalds crap !!


Now that I agree with 100%.

Beckys_Mom
QUOTE (seanph @ Apr 19 2008, 03:30 PM) *
Yummy! I'll take that! Man ... now I'm starved! Darn it Becky! grin2.gif

hey this is most likely the only part of this thread that is not heated LMAO even though its off topic...so bad bad sean *smack* no burgers for you LOL

Anyhoo sorry for going off topic

*takes her burger and beats it out fast*
Beckys_Mom
QUOTE (Ozi @ Apr 19 2008, 03:37 PM) *
See, I dont respond for a couple of days and you all assume im out of answers,

She wasnt just talking about you OZI..I believe she was also talking about A-Fighter, who has been in long after her questions

and yes 100% pure beef is best..hmmmm now I too am hungry...and might I add who ever it ws that decided to add cheese to a burger needed a good kick in the back end!! yuck

Ozi
QUOTE (tetisheri @ Apr 17 2008, 01:43 AM) *
Ozi, you still did not answer my questions:


[

Do you really believe that it is logical to reduce the western culture to "your culture of heavy drinking till you drop, fornications, one night stands, clubbing, drugs, prostitution, adultery, etc,"
"




Are you seriously saying that if a state like sudan,which has a government with Turabi's party, the National Congress Party or NCP (formerly the National Islamic Front or NIF) dominates the cabinet ,& has the following as article 18 in the constitution , say that they are muslim, I am to refuse taking that "at face value"? You filled several posts about iraq & afghanistan being "bombed back to the stone age", protested american "atrocities" but when I mention Darfur victims all you could say is Why aren't you as angry about Darfur massacres as you are about iraq & kosovo? You mentioned before the brotherhood of muslims & when one hurts, all feel the pain; always? no matter who is inflicting the pain? You are participating in this thread to inform us about Islam, if I am to take your word about islam at face value, i am also to take your SILENCE at face value. Even if the weapons were manufactured in the west, they were paid for by sudan, the decision tobuy, to shoot, & the hand that aimed, & finger on the trigger were for sure not western.
, yet they managed to protest cartoons, the teddy bear, violently. (http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/muslimprotest.asp) but nothing for darfur. If there were any protests in muslim countries or the west which were not covered by the biased western media, please refer to them. Frankly, I suspect that it is more of " my brother & I against my cousin, and my cousin & I against the stranger".





Not only did the terrorists themselves link their actions to islam, but it is more the silence of an otherwise vociferous majority & its failure to ostracize them that puts the label. The terrorists acts are repeated like 7/7 in uk, the recent plot to down planes etc, & the community should take a more active role in denouncing those responsible before these acts are committed. In the case of sudan & the taliban, you have involved governments which are aiming to establish islamic states, not a few merely angry youths. If there were demonstrations supporting the ira in several 'catholic' countries , or if the ira had put forward that they are acting in the name of catholicism as God requires from them ( & not a conflict between 2 ethnic groups) then yes, one could call them catholic terrorists.


Or a world view which portrays to them that the enemy is the west which is corrupt, has nothing good about it , only a


I still maintain that there are several issues which muslims have to solve first before they can clear "misconceptions" about Islam. It is not about double standards, the actions ( or lack of ) of muslims send ambiguous & conflicting messages about islam to non muslims. Before you blame non-muslims , muslims maybe should first agree amongst themselves about jihad, relationship with non muslims, resolve conflicts between modernity & tradition etc.
I think I have already said everything I have to say about the subject. Maybe later on I would like to know your opinion about free will in Islam, but not tonight.



QUOTE
Do you really believe that it is logical to reduce the western culture to "your culture of heavy drinking till you drop, fornications, one night stands, clubbing, drugs, prostitution, adultery, etc


No i dont, but the point i made was simply illustrating what western society is full with and what it considers freedom. You see real security, peace of mind, property, soul and family are not present in most western societies, theft, murder, rape, drugs, alcohol, prosititution, adultery, fornication etc, are the cornerstones of freedom in western society, those who think otherwise, would never leave their houses unlocked, walk the the street at night, go from one end of america to another on foot, with out being threatened of being mugged, raped, killed etc. And you call this freedom, its illusionary freedom, freedoms to practise what is bad for the individual and the society as whole. Crimnal have more rights than victims etc, its all tipsy turvy. Thats said, there are also a lot of good qualities in these societies, as long as one can refrain from all the above, which is tough, due to the enviroment and peer pressures, one can live an exeptionally spiritual life, but this is a rarety, due to the type of society we have and has been created. Also, there are other good things, freedom of relgions, freedom of expression and speech, although the latter in todays time, to be excecised it seems one has to offend another group in order to prove freedom of speech. At the cost of inflamming others. What you have in the west, is a materialistic, imperialistic, and individual serving society, it does not look at society as a whole, but as individuals and tend to benefit them.

QUOTE
Are you seriously saying that if a state like sudan,which has a government with Turabi's party, the National Congress Party or NCP (formerly the National Islamic Front or NIF) dominates the cabinet ,& has the following as article 18 in the constitution , say that they are muslim, I am to refuse taking that "at face value"? You filled several posts about iraq & afghanistan being "bombed back to the stone age", protested american "atrocities" but when I mention Darfur victims all you could say is Why aren't you as angry about Darfur massacres as you are about iraq & kosovo? You mentioned before the brotherhood of muslims & when one hurts, all feel the pain; always? no matter who is inflicting the pain? You are participating in this thread to inform us about Islam, if I am to take your word about islam at face value, i am also to take your SILENCE at face value. Even if the weapons were manufactured in the west, they were paid for by sudan, the decision tobuy, to shoot, & the hand that aimed, & finger on the trigger were for sure not western.
, yet they managed to protest cartoons, the teddy bear, violently. (http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/muslimprotest.asp) but nothing for darfur. If there were any protests in muslim countries or the west which were not covered by the biased western media, please refer to them. Frankly, I suspect that it is more of " my brother & I against my cousin, and my cousin & I against the stranger".


As i said, what is happening in Sudan is tragic and should stop, now what else do you want me to do, protest, if you read my posts, im againt that too, because it achieves nothing, it just an illusionary tool given in an illusionary freedom. Express your frustrations, but states and govermental leaders will still do as they wish. You say why I am not angry about Sudan, i am, but what can we do about it, but i am more angry about America's illegal war in Iraq than that, because, sudan would be a reason for america to bring justice to some people, but sudan has no resources, therefore its ignored and they dont bomb it to the stone age, because there is no oil, its does not serve america goals and greed. America supplies weapons to whom he wants, and then cries when their used and abused, well dont sell it to dictators, even those that you implement yourselves. Like Saddam, was your best friend before he danced to the Euro tune, and changes his reserves to Euros. You sold weapons to both iraq and iran, not siding, but supplying both in the hope they finish each other off. You manage to protest for a burning torch, for the olympics, for Tibet, but no protest for Sudan, Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, or Kashmir, Chechnya etc, the list is huge, i dont agree with protest, even those at the cartoons as many know my stance here on that, but you as people are quick to protest over everythign anything, yet you yourselves obviously dont find Darfur a cause to protest about or the others, but you do about china and the olympics and tibet, China breaks more Human rights in its own country, yet have you put economic sanctions on them, or have bombed them to the stone age. Look at North Korea, has nukes, what does the USA do, it gives it more money, help in aid etc, to persuade them to disarm, instead of furhte puttign sanctions on them like Iraq, Iran etc.Double standards and Hypocrisy is what the USA is built on.

QUOTE
Not only did the terrorists themselves link their actions to islam, but it is more the silence of an otherwise vociferous majority & its failure to ostracize them that puts the label. The terrorists acts are repeated like 7/7 in uk, the recent plot to down planes etc, & the community should take a more active role in denouncing those responsible before these acts are committed. In the case of sudan & the taliban, you have involved governments which are aiming to establish islamic states, not a few merely angry youths. If there were demonstrations supporting the ira in several 'catholic' countries , or if the ira had put forward that they are acting in the name of catholicism as God requires from them ( & not a conflict between 2 ethnic groups) then yes, one could call them catholic terrorists.


Thats the funniest thing i have heard. Terrorist who are muslim do attrocities in the name of islam, they are wrong and do so in error. That is said by the whole muslim community, i really dont know what more you want. You say the majority who are vociferous, this is false, the majority of muslim dont voice their concerns, if they did, you would see a protest everyday, for palestine and other caues, they dont, because the majority know that protest rarely achieve anythign, infact history shows, that violent protests often end up getting their objective, for example, the state of Isreal was built on terrorsim, and such activities against the arabs and this documented history. Thats just one example of violent protest achieving their goals, I dont condone either form. 7/7, recent plots etc, is what the goverment feeds us, via their spin in the media, you dont believe everything thing they say, especially if its the same goverments that take you to war with another country based on lies, yet those are conveniantly forgotten by most. if the IRA came in ot terrorism is was onthe basis of land, and whether one his protestant or catholic, even today one can get killed there for wearing wrong colours in the wrong area, is this called christian terrorism, or fundamentalism, no, this type of judgment and reporting is reserved only for islam.

QUOTE
I still maintain that there are several issues which muslims have to solve first before they can clear "misconceptions" about Islam. It is not about double standards, the actions ( or lack of ) of muslims send ambiguous & conflicting messages about islam to non muslims. Before you blame non-muslims , muslims maybe should first agree amongst themselves about jihad, relationship with non muslims, resolve conflicts between modernity & tradition etc.
I think I have already said everything I have to say about the subject. Maybe later on I would like to know your opinion about free will in Islam, but not tonight.


Firstly if i asked what jihad means, you would say holy war, WRONG! see what i mean by media protraying an agenda. Double standards, are more rampant in the west than the muslim world, although there are some that do it too. America, talks about justice, yet, gives billions on a yearly basis to Isreal, to further imprison palestinians and kill them and make themselve a military might. The excuse they are surrounded by arab states hell bent on their destruction, maybe some groups like hezbullah, but over all thats bull, if the arabs wanted to irradicate isreal, they just have to hold their hands and march on isreal as a whole and walk it in to the sea. The point im making is , isreal has commited crimes against humanity for over 50 yrs, built on terrorism, but America feeds it and supports it, and has a totally different attitude towards muslim countries. I dont wanna make this an issue about isreal its not the thread for it, but its just one example of your own double standards, you light candles and do protests for many others, yet, never for palestine, iraq, kahsmir, chechnya, etc, Why?

I do agree muslims have problems too, and the entire situation is not the west fault, i actualy dont blame the west for the conditions of muslims and their countries, but muslims themselves, they have forgotten their faith, their prophet, and their book the Quran, when muslims stick to this steadfastly, they always succeed in every way, as soon as they leave it, we become the scum of the earth. Muslim countries today live and run their countries by secular means, and not the islamic way, and look at their state. What the west could do, is leave us alone, dont implement puppets in our countires or support dictators by funding them, giving them weapons etc, just so an islamic state does not arise.

When the taliban created a new islamic state, that was great, but their implementation in certain aspects was rushed and harsh, they needed to learn from this. However, early days do you americans, when these rag heads, or what you call them towel heads, came to the white house, and met your leaders, then they were recognised as a legitmate goverment, brought in by the people of afghanistan. But when the proposition of American leaders about a pipeline in afghanistan was put to them and America runing and owning it, to this the taliban said, no, we rather do it ourself, and run it and give the benefit of it to afghanistan, since this rejection the US had it in for the taliban, but how do you invade the poorest nation with support fo your people, well you see the american people are all pretty nice bunch and not war mongers, so to gt them rallied behind the the invasion, you inflict a wound on yourself of great magnitude and then play on peoples fears.

P.s Off to soccer game, should be back with more responses later.

Ozi
A-Fighter
QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
So, does Islam not teach that we (humans) were created in God's image?
When Allah talks to man, He has to talk in a language which they can understand. Similarly when He wants to explain something He has to use similes (Misaal). Allah Almighty has indeed said in the Holy Qur'an that He made man with His own hands. He has also said that His soul was blown into man. So man has two parts, one is dust which after death goes back to dust and the soul being from Allah, rises back to Him.

Our Prophet has forbidden us to think and question about Allah Almighty's Noble Personality. He is beyond comprehension. That is why He is God. Accept Him as the Unique being full of love and mercy for His creatures. One day people of the Paradise will be able to see Allah Almighty with their eyes as clearly as we see full moon (He is many times more beautiful than Paradise itself!).

QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
How old is the Earth according to Islam? Or the entire universe? Any answers in the Qu'ran for these queries?
There is a lot of maths to it, but simply put, the age of the Universe is around 18 Billions years. This is according to (some) scientists as well as the Glorious Qur'an. Source: http://answering-christianity.com/18_billion_years.htm.

QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
What differs about the creation story in Islam? How does Islam explain extinct creatures? Are they mentioned?
This is a question which obviously needs a lot of answering. But I can guarantee to you, if you put that in Google, you will find the answer straight away. Let me make a start for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_creationism.

Note: Wikipedia is not always trustworthy, because it can be edited by people like you and me... I suggest you also look at some Islamic websites.

QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
Someone posted something about the Qua'ran mentioning Atoms. What is "atom" in original Arabic and does it actually mean the exact same thing as English? My problem is, when this book was written, there wouldn't have been a word for what we now call an atom, because no one knew it existed - so I'm confused about the translation. How did God describe an Atom in human language to people who didn't know what it was. This is my issue with all of any religious text. It can't be translated, because as soon as you do that you're altering it.
Here is a link to a website of a man called Harun Yahya. He has written a book called "The Miracle in the Atom". It contains answers to everything you had asked me and much more. Link: http://www.harunyahya.com/atom01.php. He has also created a movie based on this book: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTCNNdEISZ0&feature=related.

Note: This man is not a perfect Muslim. You should not believe everything he says, because he is a philosopher who doesn't think very straight. Most of his ideas are true and there is nothing wrong with it, but he has got some 'crazy' ideas too. Anyway, you will see what I mean when you watch his movie.

QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
Are there any foods Muslims cannot eat full stop? And what is the purpose of Halal?
We Muslims cannot eat the flesh of dead animals, pork, monkeys, dogs etc. But in times of emergency you are allowed to eat it. For example, if a man is stranded on an island and there are only pigs which he can eat, then it becomes perfectly Halal (Allowed) for him. Halal is just the Arabic word for 'Allowed', and can be used for many things.

Noble Qur'an 5:3. Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than Allah; that which hath been killed by strangling, or by a violent blow, or by a headlong fall, or by being gored to death; that which hath been (partly) eaten by a wild animal; unless ye are able to slaughter it (in due form); that which is sacrificed on stone (altars); (forbidden) also is the division (of meat) by raffling with arrows: that is impiety.

QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
Why isn't caffeine seen in the same way as alcohol... drugs, etc?
This is a question which is hard for me to understand. Caffeine is allowed, but not like 10 cups of coffee a day. It can have some serious side-effects which might even end up in death. Again, I will give you a link to a website which will make it all clear to you: http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_201_250/caffeine_beverages.htm.

QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
Is there anything medically that God forbids?
I don't really know... But will it change your life if I said 'Yes' or 'No'? I don't think so.

QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
What does Islam think about transexuality? I question this since I know of the situation in Iran. It has the second highest population of transsexuals world wide - why do you think this is? Is this good or bad?
Sorry, No comments. You can ask Ozi or someone else to reply to this.

QUOTE (HAJiME @ Apr 17 2008, 12:40 PM) *
How does Islam explain natural disasters and medical coniditions? What is their purpose in this world?
As I had mentioned previously, Islam teaches that this life is a TEST. This means that we have to pass some very hard obstacles in order to succeed. Allah Almighty will never make life too unbearable for any person. Natural Disasters occur because Allah Almighty wants to warn us that we are leaving the straight path. It is His way of telling us to keep believing, and never give up. There is much more to it, but this is basically why natural disasters occur. Let me share another excellent story with you and everyone else.


The Shipwreck:

The only survivor of a shipwreck was washed up on a small, uninhabited island. He prayed feverishly for Allah to rescue him, and every day he scanned the horizon for help, but none seemed forthcoming. Exhausted, he eventually managed to build a little hut out of driftwood to protect him from the elements and to store his few possessions. But then one day, after scavenging for food, he arrived home to find his little hut in flames, the smoke rolling up to the sky. The worst had happened: everything was lost. He was stunned with grief and anger. “Allah, how could you do this to me?!” he cried. Early the next day, however, he was awakened by the sound of a ship that was approaching the island. It had come to rescue him.

“How did you know I was here?” asked the man of his rescuers.
“We saw your smoke signal.” they replied.

It is easy to get discouraged when things are going badly. But we shouldn't lose heart, because Allah is at work in our lives, even in the midst of pain and suffering.
tetisheri
QUOTE
No i dont, but the point i made was simply illustrating what western society is full with and what it considers freedom. You see real security, peace of mind, property, soul and family are not present in most western societies, theft, murder, rape, drugs, alcohol, prosititution, adultery, fornication etc, are the cornerstones of freedom in western society, those who think otherwise, would never leave their houses unlocked, walk the the street at night, go from one end of america to another on foot, with out being threatened of being mugged, raped, killed etc...And you call this freedom, its illusionary freedom, freedoms to practise what is bad for the individual and the society as whole. Crimnal have more rights than victims etc, its all tipsy turvy


you must realize that human nature is the same everywhere. Have you been to the middle east? I lived in a north african country for a couple of years & can tell you that leaving your house unlocked is really a very bad idea. All houses there have windows with iron bars. Our large guard dog was not enough to scare away thieves, so we had to hire a guard. Personal anecdotes aside, do you remember the case of the Saudi woman who was
raped yet received a 6 months prison sentence plus 90 lashes ( was 'pardoned' by the king after it became a huge scandal) , there was also the case of the french adolescent who was raped also in SA. Women (veiled & unveiled) were sexually harrassed by a mob of several hundred men in down town cairo February 2006. This was not a unique incident, nor is it restricted only to Egypt or SA. To judge how serious it is, here is what 'The Egyptian Center for Women's Rights' had to say in its "Campaign Against Sexual Harassment" :
QUOTE
Public sexual harassment against women has become a pervasive problem in Egypt and presents a significant obstacle both to women’s well-being and their participation in public life, which in turn impacts the course of democratic progress in Egypt.http://www.ecwronline.org/english/sexual%20harassment/SHfactsheet.htm


As for drugs, there is the problem of the widespread use of Qat in Yemen for example, Lebanon,Morocco's production of hash...etc. Did you read post 245? What you call " the cornerstones of freedom in western society" are also prevalent in the east. I hate to disillusion you, but people are the same everywhere. One cannot demonize a group while idolizing the other.


QUOTE
Thats said, there are also a lot of good qualities in these societies, as long as one can refrain from all the above, which is tough, due to the enviroment and peer pressures, one can live an exeptionally spiritual life, but this is a rarety, due to the type of society we have and has been created. Also, there are other good things, freedom of relgions, freedom of expression and speech, although the latter in todays time, to be excecised it seems one has to offend another group in order to prove freedom of speech. At the cost of inflamming others. What you have in the west, is a materialistic, imperialistic, and individual serving society, it does not look at society as a whole, but as individuals and tend to benefit them.


At last Ozi you had something kind of nice to say about western society , though you tend to take with one hand what you just gave with the other!!! May I remind you that the individualistic/imperialistic societies are the largest donors of aid worldwide? Also, human rights bodies such as amnesty international,
or aid agencies like the red cross, médecins sans frontières, or WWF & greenpeace, were all founded in the west, & depend on volunteers & donations from the west. Hence, next to the materialistic selfishness there is also a softer, kinder side. Neither east nor west are all black or all white no matter which religion they follow.


QUOTE
As i said, what is happening in Sudan is tragic and should stop, now what else do you want me to do, protest, if you read my posts, im againt that too, because it achieves nothing, it just an illusionary tool given in an illusionary freedom. Express your frustrations, but states and govermental leaders will still do as they wish. You say why I am not angry about Sudan, i am, but what can we do about it, but i am more angry about America's illegal war in Iraq than that, because, sudan would be a reason for america to bring justice to some people, but sudan has no resources, therefore its ignored and they dont bomb it to the stone age, because there is no oil, its does not serve america goals and greed.


You could have fooled me! You're not half as vocal in expressing that anger as you are about iraq. I still say I haven't seen one demonstration anywhere in islamic countries denouncing the murder of innocent fellow muslims & that silence is louder than any words. Sudan actually is very rich in natural resources including oil particularly in the area of darfur. This is the reason why their own government is bombing them "back to the stone age" .Had the US intervened there, people would have said "bad self-serving america, still after the oil"! they didn't & you are still pointing your finger. Actually, people would have taken any intervention as a proof of america's "anti-islamic" stance. I still feel it has more to do with who is doing the killing, foreign or muslim.


QUOTE
America supplies weapons to whom he wants, and then cries when their used and abused, well dont sell it to dictators, even those that you implement yourselves. Like Saddam, was your best friend before he danced to the Euro tune, and changes his reserves to Euros. You sold weapons to both iraq and iran, not siding, but supplying both in the hope they finish each other off.... Look at North Korea, has nukes, what does the USA do, it gives it more money, help in aid etc, to persuade them to disarm, instead of furhte puttign sanctions on them like Iraq, Iran etc.Double standards and Hypocrisy is what the USA is built on.


Ozi, I'm NOT american! I can assure you I never supplied Saddam with a pin, let alone a bomb. Kidding aside, he killed several thousand people with 'home made' chemical weapons ( hence 'chemical ali').You're also forgetting the role of russia, one of the largest suppliers of weapons. Please check how many charities are active in darfur vs ...total silence or even denial. You forgot that Pakistan also has a nuke. Honestly, do you feel that the world will be a safe place if iran goes nuclear?

QUOTE
Thats the funniest thing i have heard. Terrorist who are muslim do attrocities in the name of islam, they are wrong and do so in error. ... I dont condone either form. 7/7, recent plots etc, is what the goverment feeds us, via their spin in the media, you dont believe everything thing they say, especially if its the same goverments that take you to war with another country based on lies, yet those are conveniantly forgotten by most. if the IRA came in ot terrorism is was onthe basis of land, and whether one his protestant or catholic, even today one can get killed there for wearing wrong colours in the wrong area, is this called christian terrorism, or fundamentalism, no, this type of judgment and reporting is reserved only for islam.


What "muslim terrorists committing atrocities in the name of islam"? So far you have consistently denied all attacks from 9/11 to 7/7, to the most recent plot! Who then are these 8 people whose photos were published? Media spin? These denials only creat a credibility problem. No problem could ever be solved if its existence is persistently denied & swept under the carpet. There is a problem of violence that has to be faced. When you insist that jihad does not mean holy war, but 'struggle', I can't help but feel that you are addressing the wrong audience. It is all these misled muslim young men who should be informed by their sheikhs & imams about the real meaning of jihad. As for northern irland, the root of the problem is population movement from scotland to irland, when the new protestent scots settlers were given land & power over the indigenous catholic irish. It has more to do with the history of the british crown than christianity. If you find anywhere a record of an ira terrorist saying "I did it in the name of my church", I will stand corrected & apologize.

The rest follows below
tetisheri
QUOTE
I do agree muslims have problems too, and the entire situation is not the west fault, i actualy dont blame the west for the conditions of muslims and their countries, but muslims themselves, they have forgotten their faith, their prophet, and their book the Quran, when muslims stick to this steadfastly, they always succeed in every way, as soon as they leave it, we become the scum of the earth. Muslim countries today live and run their countries by secular means, and not the islamic way, and look at their state. What the west could do, is leave us alone, dont implement puppets in our countires or support dictators by funding them, giving them weapons etc, just so an islamic state does not arise.


This view that all problems will be solved once society returns to its 'authentic' cultural beliefs is characteristic of all revivalistic movements.
QUOTE
" The more rapid the social change, the more indeterminable the environment becomes for individuals as the personal systems living in a state of transition, & the more marked the need for religion to maintain identity in the process of change...{ which} is perceived as an out-and-out threat, & a longing for the past is cultivated as a result. the restoration of what has been repressed by the alien, a return of overlaid indigenous elements, & a parallel reorientation of thought is raised to the level of a program of political action" Tibi, Bassam
. Is it realistic however? You might find his book"Islam and the Cultural Accommodation of Social Change" interesting.



QUOTE
When the taliban created a new islamic state, that was great, but their implementation in certain aspects was rushed and harsh, they needed to learn from this.


Taliban again? How could a stata be called "Islamic" if it is funded by profits from an activity prohibited & 'cursed' in the quran? You yourself agreed that drugs are prohibited as "muskar". I will copy from a previous post:
-http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060921&articleId=3294 : "The United Nations has announced that opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan has soared and is expected to increase by 59% in 2006. The production of opium is estimated to have increased by 49% in relation to 2005. "

-http://www.unodc.org/pdf/publications/afg_opium_economy_www.pdf:"Between 1996, when the Taliban took control of most of Afghanistan, and the year 1999, opium production...Taliban originally had planned to
prohibit opium production, they gave up on this plan once in power, and restricted the drug prohibition to
cannabis only. The acceptance of the agricultural tax, known as ushr (usually 10%) and the zakat (usually
20%) by the mullahs and the local authorities was interpreted by the farmers and itinerant workers as an
implicit support for the cultivation of opium poppy.52 In addition, the Taliban also received taxes from the
opium traders. There are also indications that some of the local Taliban commanders and mullahs were
personally involved in the opium trade. Even more important, a number of warlords, who were already
involved in the opium trade, surrendered to the Taliban in exchange for the promise to continue with their
lucrative opium business. Both the Taliban and various groups fighting against them (“Northern Alliance”)
benefited from opium poppy cultivation and trade. However, as most of the opium producing areas were
under Taliban control, the largest profits out of opium were also reaped by the Taliban."
This is a quotation from a UN report. I guess you agree with me then that they fall in the category of 'cursed' according to the quran?



tetisheri
QUOTE (Beckys_Mom @ Apr 19 2008, 12:36 PM) *
post 421 was posted a while back and as they both havent answered...I think maybe they just cant answer...for they both have been in and posted ver sinse and dodged the questions

its rude..but thats how it is



Yay, I got one response!
Fully agree with you about the cheesy meat.
Beckys_Mom
QUOTE (tetisheri @ Apr 20 2008, 03:11 AM) *
Yay, I got one response!
Fully agree with you about the cheesy meat.

You've put so much effort into all your posts, its a shame they are being overlooked...

I hope its not cuz you are a female lol..but seriously...I hope all of your points get addressed!!!
Ozi
QUOTE (tetisheri @ Apr 20 2008, 01:12 AM) *
you must realize that human nature is the same everywhere. Have you been to the middle east? I lived in a north african country for a couple of years & can tell you that leaving your house unlocked is really a very bad idea. All houses there have windows with iron bars. Our large guard dog was not enough to scare away thieves, so we had to hire a guard. Personal anecdotes aside, do you remember the case of the Saudi woman who was
raped yet received a 6 months prison sentence plus 90 lashes ( was 'pardoned' by the king after it became a huge scandal) , there was also the case of the french adolescent who was raped also in SA. Women (veiled & unveiled) were sexually harrassed by a mob of several hundred men in down town cairo February 2006. This was not a unique incident, nor is it restricted only to Egypt or SA. To judge how serious it is, here is what 'The Egyptian Center for Women's Rights' had to say in its "Campaign Against Sexual Harassment" :


As for drugs, there is the problem of the widespread use of Qat in Yemen for example, Lebanon,Morocco's production of hash...etc. Did you read post 245? What you call " the cornerstones of freedom in western society" are also prevalent in the east. I hate to disillusion you, but people are the same everywhere. One cannot demonize a group while idolizing the other.




At last Ozi you had something kind of nice to say about western society , though you tend to take with one hand what you just gave with the other!!! May I remind you that the individualistic/imperialistic societies are the largest donors of aid worldwide? Also, human rights bodies such as amnesty international,
or aid agencies like the red cross, médecins sans frontières, or WWF & greenpeace, were all founded in the west, & depend on volunteers & donations from the west. Hence, next to the materialistic selfishness there is also a softer, kinder side. Neither east nor west are all black or all white no matter which religion they follow.




You could have fooled me! You're not half as vocal in expressing that anger as you are about iraq. I still say I haven't seen one demonstration anywhere in islamic countries denouncing the murder of innocent fellow muslims & that silence is louder than any words. Sudan actually is very rich in natural resources including oil particularly in the area of darfur. This is the reason why their own government is bombing them "back to the stone age" .Had the US intervened there, people would have said "bad self-serving america, still after the oil"! they didn't & you are still pointing your finger. Actually, people would have taken any intervention as a proof of america's "anti-islamic" stance. I still feel it has more to do with who is doing the killing, foreign or muslim.




Ozi, I'm NOT american! I can assure you I never supplied Saddam with a pin, let alone a bomb. Kidding aside, he killed several thousand people with 'home made' chemical weapons ( hence 'chemical ali').You're also forgetting the role of russia, one of the largest suppliers of weapons. Please check how many charities are active in darfur vs ...total silence or even denial. You forgot that Pakistan also has a nuke. Honestly, do you feel that the world will be a safe place if iran goes nuclear?



What "muslim terrorists committing atrocities in the name of islam"? So far you have consistently denied all attacks from 9/11 to 7/7, to the most recent plot! Who then are these 8 people whose photos were published? Media spin? These denials only creat a credibility problem. No problem could ever be solved if its existence is persistently denied & swept under the carpet. There is a problem of violence that has to be faced. When you insist that jihad does not mean holy war, but 'struggle', I can't help but feel that you are addressing the wrong audience. It is all these misled muslim young men who should be informed by their sheikhs & imams about the real meaning of jihad. As for northern irland, the root of the problem is population movement from scotland to irland, when the new protestent scots settlers were given land & power over the indigenous catholic irish. It has more to do with the history of the british crown than christianity. If you find anywhere a record of an ira terrorist saying "I did it in the name of my church", I will stand corrected & apologize.

The rest follows below



QUOTE
you must realize that human nature is the same everywhere. Have you been to the middle east? I lived in a north african country for a couple of years & can tell you that leaving your house unlocked is really a very bad idea. All houses there have windows with iron bars. Our large guard dog was not enough to scare away thieves, so we had to hire a guard. Personal anecdotes aside, do you remember the case of the Saudi woman who was
raped yet received a 6 months prison sentence plus 90 lashes ( was 'pardoned' by the king after it became a huge scandal) , there was also the case of the french adolescent who was raped also in SA. Women (veiled & unveiled) were sexually harrassed by a mob of several hundred men in down town cairo February 2006. This was not a unique incident, nor is it restricted only to Egypt or SA. To judge how serious it is, here is what 'The Egyptian Center for Women's Rights' had to say in its "Campaign Against Sexual Harassment" :


Ok the first mistake you are making is this, your assuming i am defending muslim countries, that I am not, i know the problems prevailent in the muslim countries and societies. To simply anwser youa and get my point across in a simply way is this. America, is the torch barer of freedom, secularism and Capatalism, therefore its should be looked at in more detail the freedoms of its states and its problems. What you not realising is this, the secular way of life, law, and capatalism, are the cornerstones of muslim country set ups too. The result is the same, as what you get in America, thats my whole point, your way of life, has some good things, but overall its degenerative to society and makes it fragmented, the family nuclues goes out of the window, rape, theft, murder, drugs etc become the norm, this is what is happening in muslim countries, but America as the torch barer of this lifestyle, the american dream is the cause, its force full nature around the world occupying and putting pressures on nations to adopt their style of governing. The results is exactly what happens in SA, Egypt. You see if muslim countries told America to stuff it where the sun dont shine, in order to implement their own system an islamic system, they would be bombed back to the stoneage, so there is no choice available too, its the American, (western way) or the highway. In conclusion muslim ought to govern according to islam, not secular, western values and governing systems.

QUOTE
As for drugs, there is the problem of the widespread use of Qat in Yemen for example, Lebanon,Morocco's production of hash...etc. Did you read post 245? What you call " the cornerstones of freedom in western society" are also prevalent in the east. I hate to disillusion you, but people are the same everywhere. One cannot demonize a group while idolizing the other.


Precisely, you make countries live your way, the same problem you have, become theirs too, in the name of freedom, this illusionary freedom, to do bad things, poeple lose what is true freedom. People are the same, and will do similar things, its what governs them is what moulds the societies, and at current, the world has problems, due to living the american dream, or it being forced on them.

QUOTE
At last Ozi you had something kind of nice to say about western society , though you tend to take with one hand what you just gave with the other!!! May I remind you that the individualistic/imperialistic societies are the largest donors of aid worldwide? Also, human rights bodies such as amnesty international,
or aid agencies like the red cross, médecins sans frontières, or WWF & greenpeace, were all founded in the west, & depend on volunteers & donations from the west. Hence, next to the materialistic selfishness there is also a softer, kinder side. Neither east nor west are all black or all white no matter which religion they follow.


this is exactly what our goverments do to. Yes you give a lot , but we take more. According to the UN, the western population, equates 20% of the world, the third world makes the rest up. Yet this 20% consume 80% of the worlds resources, the other 20% is fought over the 80% in the third world. True western justice, left off where colonialism, finished. The above my dear, just become token gestures.

QUOTE
You could have fooled me! You're not half as vocal in expressing that anger as you are about iraq. I still say I haven't seen one demonstration anywhere in islamic countries denouncing the murder of innocent fellow muslims & that silence is louder than any words. Sudan actually is very rich in natural resources including oil particularly in the area of darfur. This is the reason why their own government is bombing them "back to the stone age" .Had the US intervened there, people would have said "bad self-serving america, still after the oil"! they didn't & you are still pointing your finger. Actually, people would have taken any intervention as a proof of america's "anti-islamic" stance. I still feel it has more to do with who is doing the killing, foreign or muslim.


Your not understanding, I am against any type of protest, its not recommended in Islam, and i dont recommend to other muslims to protests, its achieves nothing. As the Uk can tell you, it did not stop anyone going to iraq. As for Sudan what is happening there is tragic, and international communities need to do something about it, like for example, stop selling your made weopans to the goverment, it helps them stay in power, like you kept saddam strong and in power, during tthe time he was your best friend, cause he spent money on you. Muslims are bothered about Darfur, your media wont show that, its has no reason to, only shows what demonises islam, and makes islam look as though its an Arab thing, when infact arabs only make up 25% of the muslim population. The point is, you seem to care about alot of issues, like tibet, etc, in your country, howcome you dont protest about it, i dont protest about anything, why dont you protest and lobby the goverment, to take actions, stop selling weopons and do something good, collectively not unanimously, like Iraq, (illegal war) even accoridng to the bodies like UN, created by the west, yet you ignore these bodies, because at the end of the day, they serve you, not you serving them. Protest, for iraq, sudan, kashmir, chechnya, palestine, (over 50 yrs of torment), do you shed a tear, light a candle, do a vigil for them, i doubt it. They way you harp on about Sudan is as though even muslims verbally condemn it, you probably wont be happy until we bomb them etc, but thats your job in the west, especially America as the world police.

QUOTE
Ozi, I'm NOT american! I can assure you I never supplied Saddam with a pin, let alone a bomb. Kidding aside, he killed several thousand people with 'home made' chemical weapons ( hence 'chemical ali').You're also forgetting the role of russia, one of the largest suppliers of weapons. Please check how many charities are active in darfur vs ...total silence or even denial. You forgot that Pakistan also has a nuke. Honestly, do you feel that the world will be a safe place if iran goes nuclear?.


Firstly, a country like America dictates to other, and say dont have nukes, your a danger, yet they are the only country with a record of using one. To me they pose more danger than Iran, if you can have one, how can you stop others. Pakistan is often called the Islamic Nuke, what poeple fail to realise is that, the islamic bomb exploded the day muhammed started spreading islam, since then islam is in every corner of the earth, and continues to grow fast although the western media collectively demonise it. America, sold weapons to iraq and Iran at the same time in the hope that they wipe each other out, did they try and stop it , NO? they instead supplied both sides, your were not alone, its was a good opportunity for all, including the UK, who back then loved Saddam. Funny how one day he is a mate, the next a tryrant created by you. You ask if iran has a nuke, will the world be a safer place, i think so, because what you can see is this, anyone with a nuke, America wont attack, like Korea, China, SAudi, Pakistan, etc, so even though they act as world police, only against weak nations, so if your well equipped so to speak, At least you know there is a lesser threat you will be invaded by the worlds most powerful terrorists. my answer the world and iran would be safer from Western Imperialism and threats.

QUOTE
What "muslim terrorists committing atrocities in the name of islam"? So far you have consistently denied all attacks from 9/11 to 7/7, to the most recent plot! Who then are these 8 people whose photos were published? Media spin? These denials only creat a credibility problem. No problem could ever be solved if its existence is persistently denied & swept under the carpet. There is a problem of violence that has to be faced. When you insist that jihad does not mean holy war, but 'struggle', I can't help but feel that you are addressing the wrong audience. It is all these misled muslim young men who should be informed by their sheikhs & imams about the real meaning of jihad. As for northern irland, the root of the problem is population movement from scotland to irland, when the new protestent scots settlers were given land & power over the indigenous catholic irish. It has more to do with the history of the british crown than christianity. If you find anywhere a record of an ira terrorist saying "I did it in the name of my church", I will stand corrected & apologize.


i agree thigns should not be swept under the carpet, like the wreckage from 9-11 the metal and so on, quickly shipped to china to be melted, so independant forensics could not take a look and investigate. 9-11 is so shoddy, the official verdict, it would not even stand up in court, the 19 hijackers, 7 are still alive, so much for you photos, maybe spin does work. Overall 9-11 has to many holes, not the place to discuss, i condemn who ever did this tragic act, in which many muslims died too, Simply show the CCTV footage which is in every ariport in America, where you board a plane, show those terrorists going on the plane. 7/7, the london bombing, the only time, a suicide bomber, buys food from McDonalds, then goes back because her was short changed, why? especailly if you are going to die. Why buy return ticket, when you dont plan to return. Why use timers on bombs, when in all suicide bombing the person is the timer himself, when he decides it happens, you see there are flows with it all. With over 200 diclassified documents showing plans and activities by America to cause self inflicted wounds for motive to invade other countries is available how can one put it past them this time, to invade the poorest nation on earth, the American poeple are good and uphold christian values at large, they are not war mongers, unfortunately, their goverment has a different destiny planned for America. How can i be addressing the wrong audience, when its the western people and media which portray Jihad as Holy war, muslim know its a stuggle, could be on a battlefied, its could be spiritual, its has many arenas for that struggle, there is not term in islam as Holy war, this is what the crusades were. The closest thing to holy war in islam, is Jihad - Fi- Sabilillah. STruggle in the path of allah. Usually meant to fight for Islam and its preservation. So i addressed the right audience. You dont find anywhere a muslim saying i did in name of my mosque, maybe in the name of allah. But the IRA, and people there today get killed, or beaten for wearing the wrong colours etc, CAtholic on protestant, yet it is not classed as christian terrorism. The tamil Tigers, do bombs in Sri-lanka, is it called Hindu terrorism, etc etc. You have double standards and only reserve demonisation, for islam.

QUOTE
This view that all problems will be solved once society returns to its 'authentic' cultural beliefs is characteristic of all revivalistic movements.


Well if you research history, when the west stood more by the church and were governed by the church and christianity, you were in the dark ages. islam,on the other hand, when it stook to its teachings, and its followers implemented it in their everday lifes, islam ruled from indonesia to spain, as soon as the decided to leave the implementation of islam in their countries, since then they have become scum, living by western secular law, while holding islamic values at home, the two dont mix.

QUOTE
Taliban again? How could a stata be called "Islamic" if it is funded by profits from an activity prohibited & 'cursed' in the quran? You yourself agreed that drugs are prohibited as "muskar". I will copy from a previous post:
-http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060921&articleId=3294 : "The United Nations has announced that opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan has soared and is expected to increase by 59% in 2006. The production of opium is estimated to have increased by 49% in relation to 2005. "

-http://www.unodc.org/pdf/publications/afg_opium_economy_www.pdf:"Between 1996, when the Taliban took control of most of Afghanistan, and the year 1999, opium production...Taliban originally had planned to
prohibit opium production, they gave up on this plan once in power, and restricted the drug prohibition to
cannabis only. The acceptance of the agricultural tax, known as ushr (usually 10%) and the zakat (usually
20%) by the mullahs and the local authorities was interpreted by the farmers and itinerant workers as an
implicit support for the cultivation of opium poppy.52 In addition, the Taliban also received taxes from the
opium traders. There are also indications that some of the local Taliban commanders and mullahs were
personally involved in the opium trade. Even more important, a number of warlords, who were already
involved in the opium trade, surrendered to the Taliban in exchange for the promise to continue with their
lucrative opium business. Both the Taliban and various groups fighting against them (“Northern Alliance”)
benefited from opium poppy cultivation and trade. However, as most of the opium producing areas were
under Taliban control, the largest profits out of opium were also reaped by the Taliban."
This is a quotation from a UN report. I guess you agree with me then that they fall in the category of 'cursed' according to the quran?


For a country which has farmers dependant on the opium fr survival, had to get rid under the Taliban, but ofcourse, there may have been some Talban officals or workers involved inthe trade as were most of the Northern Alliance, the very poeple which are a part of the coalition against the taliban, infact according to the UN, the northern Allaince and its human rights records are worse than most in the world, yet, they seem to be your friends in afghanistan and now they share power with Karzai. The taliban on opiuim were against it, the tax is about right, but Zakat, is only 2.5% of annual surplus earnings, which is given to the poor, they were slowly weeding out the trade of opium upon which most afhans farmers depended, for them to grow other stuff, it had to be worth it monetry wise, the taliban were trying to weed it out, this was going to be a slow process, as aFghanistan was and now is again under the coalition the number supplier of opium. Why dont you compare how low the taliban had it, with how high the trade is now, since the US and Karzair took over.

Ozi
Ozi
QUOTE (tetisheri @ Apr 18 2008, 08:38 PM) *
While I am waiting for Ozi's or A Fighter's response to my questions / comments in posts 421 & 443, I would like to add a new question. What is your opinion about Turkey's efforts to revise Hadith, as mentioned in the BBC site quoted by Sean?




IMO this revision is a courageous step towards re-opening the door of "ijtihad" & will help resolve some urgent issues . There are some hadiths which contradict the spirit or letter of the quran. For example hadith n° 1237 in Bukhari's book "al Jana'ez" :



In this hadith, Abi Dhar cited the Prophet saying that whoever , from the muslim 'umma , proclaimed that he will not commit "shirk" ( ascribing partners to, or worshiping any beside, Allah), will enter paradise. Abi Dhar asked the Prophet :"even if he commits adultry or stole?" the Prophet replied :" even if he commits adultry or stole". Abi Dhar asked the question thrice & was given the same answer thrice. According to this hadith, adultery & theft will be disregarded by Allah in exchange for a proclamation of faith. Why then does the quran & the accepted shari'a forbid & impose penalties on these crimes even on practicing muslims? There is a contradiction here! How could believers & followers of the Prophet claim that he condoned adultery & theft ? This example is important because hadiths establish the traditions which explain Islam & inform muslims how to live their lives. The example of Turkey should be followed elsewhere.

Ozi seems to suspect that there is a conspiracy to impose a "watered down" western Islam on moslems. I do not believe that this is true. During the last decades there has been revivalistic movements in islam seeking the re-creation of a past golden age as a solution to present day problems; under the banner of " al islam howa al hal" ( Islam is the solution ) . Chief among these problems that of tradition vs modernity, cultural continuity vs change. Political & Economic pressures lead to an increasing sense of frustration. The inability to find immediate solutions leads to the idealization of the past; adopting a simplified world view which excludes the other by painting them in negative colors as "fornicators, drug users, corrupt ...etc" , therefore integration is rejected & the issue of change avoided. This can be taken to an almost paranoid extreme which views all others as enemies seeking the destruction of the umma & its religion. Validation is sought in miraculous " scientific" proofs, natural phenomena..etc. The problem is that it also leads to a form of ritualism when form & ritual become of utmost importance.

This 'malaise' could be a reason why Kosovo & Iraq arouse so much anger whereas Darfur does not, or why there were demonstrations threatening violence over a film, cartoon or teddy bear , while excuses will be found for taliban for example, or why the bloodshed in iraq by fellow muslims is glossed over. As a result, muslims are giving the world a whole set of confusing & conflicting signals , but are unable to see why the 'misconceptions' about islam persist, which in turn reinforces the image of being an island of righteousness in a sea of evil, or a victim of a tyrannical power bent on their destruction.

I have now come a full circle back to what I said in the first post, that it is crucial to re-open ijtihad & tafseer,so I will stop here. However, I am still interested in your input.



Stop harping on about Darfur, Iraq, Iran, etc, these are not related to the subject matter, yet i keep having to entertain and address these points, either take it or leave it, i have enough on the matter and made my position clear. As for the above, hadith, you see this is typical of wertern style judgment, lets take things out of context.

What the hadith is relating to and showing is the grevious sin of Shirk, joining parterns with allah or worhsipping others besides him, Allahs says in the quran that he will never forgive this sin, meaning if you die in this state of belief, you will never get forgiveness. The person asks the prophet the question, he answers three times, even if he has commited adultery or stole, he can still go to paradise, but not if he commits shirk, what this means is, and i know you probably know, but rather present it in this twisted manner, is this. If you commit anything else, murder, adultery, theft etc, if you repent sincerly, before death, that door is opne right to the end moment, the chance to repent for those sins, Allah is most merciful as long as it is sincere, he will fogive you for those sins, but he will never forgive for shirk, so the prophet is saying, even if you have been and adulterer or a murder, as long as you dont commit shirk, there is a possibilty that you will be forgiven if repent. simple as that.

As for western type islam, this is a reality, there have been requests from non muslim to water down the quran, take out, legal punishment in the shariah, take out words like jihad etc, simply asking us to do what the christians did with the bible, change it. Ijtihad and tafseer, both need to come back, especally ijtihad, but i bet you probably think you know what it is, and how it works, but in reality like most of who quote are well of the mark. Consensus of opinion, based around the quran and sunnah, for things that are in the grey area, is where scholarly opinion, ijtihad, can ifluence what processes and and changes need to come about, but this is not to change the fundamentals or the quran.

Let me qive you another hadith very briefly, its actually a long story. A man commits 99 murders, he somes to his senses and want to change, he goes to a learned man and asks, " I have killed 99 people , will your god forgive me for my sins", the learned man answers NO! how can he you killed 99 people, you will never be forgiven". so the man thinks, what the hell, its 99, i might as well make it a hundred, because he did not like the answer. So he kills him. He then goes to a second learned man, and asks the same, the second man says, yes you can be forgiven, but only if you repent truly, and refrain from such things for the rest of your life, and one final advise is that when you do repent and change move away to a new place and start a fresh, because Allah is all merciful. He like this answer and repents to allahs, sincerly for his previous ways, on his journey to a new place, he dies, the angel who take them to hell comes to collect him, but at the same time, so does the angel of heaven, they both say, he is coming with me, the first angel says, he killed 100 men, hell is his home, the second angel says, yes but he repented and changed his way therefore his home is heaven. So allah tells them, measure the distance he travelled to go to his new life, if he is past the halfway and closer to his new life, then bring him to heaven otherwise hell. As they measure it, he slightly short of the halfway mark, so allah grabs the earth and pulls it further, past the halfway mark, in order to bring him to heaven, showing that because he repented sincerley, Allah forgave him, even at the last moment, because his repentance was so sincere, allah pulls the earth forward in order to forgive him etc. this is a story cut short, but the way you interpet things, you would probaly say its condoning killing, 100 at that. Well its not, and that is obvious.

Ozi
Beckys_Mom
Good man Ozi..you sure put in the effort to respond.. thumbsup.gif I hope teri will be pleased
seanph
QUOTE
... Sean. The latter doing the usual technique of making a post with hundreds of links, as though quantity matters and not the quality does not. All The universities listed, dont dispute the Textual integrity of the quran, only IW , AI do, using outdated material.


And, of course, Mr. Muslim has not a clue as to quality or quantity of any Islamic material posted anywhere beyond his precious Islamic Awareness web site. He knows only what he can regurgitate from said source - which is readily apparent from the above statement. But members here already know that. Can you say broken record?! grin2.gif That said, Answering Islam--which easily refutes ALL material from IA--has shown that the textual integrity of the Qur'an is only disputed amongst the fervently religious. Only Swiss cheese has more holes in it! yes.gif Of course, Mr. Muslim will deny such material as being completely bogus - be it from a university or a rebuttal apologetic web site. But, again, we all know that.

Answering Islam: Textual Variants of the Qur'an

Most Muslims claim that the text of the Qur'an is identical to that received by Muhammad. This is a convenient thing to believe, but is it the truth? There is overwhelming evidence that it is not:

1. Evidence of Change Before 'Uthman

Why did 'Uthman feel the need to destroy other copies of the Qur'an, unless they contained variants? Why did Ibn Ma'sud refuse to hand over his copy for destruction? How do we know that 'Uthman's copy was better than any of the others?

Jam' Al-Qur'an Chapter 1 - The Initial Collection of the Qur'an Text
Jam' Al-Qur'an Chapter 2 - The Uthmanic Recension of the Qur'an
Jam' Al-Qur'an Chapter 3 - The Codices of ibn Mas`ud and Ubayy ibn Ka`b
from the Hadiths part 2 - the first collection of the Qur'an
from the Hadiths part 3 - Differences before the 'Uthmanic collection
from the Hadiths part 4 - the 'Uthmanic collection
Relation of Shi'a Theology to the Qur'an
A variant from Ubayy's Codex (as documented by Yusuf Ali)
Distortion in the Qur'an

A Contribution of Uthman to the Qur'an
Uthman's standardising of the Qur'an
'Uthman and the Recension of the Koran


And much, much more!

ANSWERING ISLAM: http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Text/index.html

Kindly,

Sean
Ozi
QUOTE (Doug1o29 @ Apr 17 2008, 04:39 PM) *
From what I have been reading these past couple of days, the Quran, having been dictated by one man, lacks the interpolation common in the Bible. In the Bible, scribes and redactors made changes and filled in the blanks (This was continued in the Midrash after the Bible was closed.). So, we may reasonably assume that the Quran is the word of Muhammed and that there was very little opportunity for alteration between the time he spoke the words and the time they were recorded. Occasionally, Muhammed would dictate a verse and tell the scribe to stick it in with other verses on the same topic, so the Quran does not always preserve the sequence.

Apparently there were some verses that were dictated, but because the people charged with entering them into the record were killed in battle before they could do so, a few verses may be missing, but this is not certain. All in all, for an ancient text, the Quran is remarkably complete.

The Bible, of course, does not preserve original quotes: after centuries of word-of-mouth transmission, original wording was lost. Even the Ten Commandments have different wording in Numbers 20, Numbers 34 and Deuteronomy 5 and there are three different versions of the Bible, so there are even more variants than these.

r subject: I would have to wonder about a legal system that condones the murder and torture of people just because they had an affair that someone elsWhat concerns me now is whether there have been changes since the Quran was dictated. And the best way to decide that issue is to compare modern texts with ancient ones. The best way for me to do this is to compare translations of modern vs. ancient texts. Because of the translation problem, I do not expect exact correspondence, but must settle for close approximations. If I knew Arabic I could detect things that are not apparent in a translation and could find changes that translations couldn't show.

I must make these observations for myself and must make up my own mind. What some Christian website says is suspect, as is what some Muslim website says. I would not be inclined to take someone's word for things like this without checking them myself and you have the added problem that on one of the evolution threads you completely demolished your own credibility.


Are you trying to say that capeo is not quoting the Quran? Are the verses he says are from the Quran actually from someplace else?

Or are you trying to say that the Quran doesn't say what it says? You are starting to sound like some fundamentalist Christian who misquotes and distorts the Bible to suit his own ends. Is this what you are doing?


The only way I have to judge a religion is by what its adherents do. Actions are based on belief. Words are just words; if they don't inform action, then one does not really believe them. If no one believes them enough to practice them, then the source doesn't matter.

I have not heard any Muslims denouncing 9/11, regardless of how they think it came about. I do not hear Muslims denouncing the warlike stance of some of their mullahs. By this lack, I can only judge that most Muslims think such things are acceptable.


Indeed, the list is huge. But please note that these are secular activities. Math, science, engineering, physics are not religious topics. If you don't design the building correctly, it falls down, no matter whether it has a cross or a crescent on it. What matters is whether the engineer built it right, not what god he prayed to.

Law is anothee didn't like, yet looks the other way when it's the king or some other VIP that is doing this.

I note that you have a dim view of American morality. Allow me to quote an article by Memoona Hasnain of the Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Full text at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlere...i?artid=1298319



Like it or not, the primary means of AIDS transmission is promiscuous sexual behavior. The US' infection rate is still below 1%, even though the epidemic has been known here for decades longer. Instead of condemning us for our imagined moral shortcomings, you had better clean up your own act. AIDS is going to change the face of human existence on this planet. The countries who control it most effectively will come out ahead and those that are too sqeamish to talk about it or so dishonest as to deny that they have a problem, are going to lose big. And it doesn't matter how they pray.

At the moment, several Muslim countries have infection levels eight-to-ten times higher than the US. Now, what were you saying about morality?


Whether the Muslims in question were corrupt, or just following the normal practices of their day, I don't know, but Muslims were definitely involved in the slave trade, both as slavers and as slaves. By the 1850s, Congress had outlawed the importation of slaves to America, but the trade continued illegally. One slave ship was seized and sold at auction; the slaves on board were released in Liberia.

Slavery in America, as in most of the rest of the world, was abolished in the mid-19th century because it was rapidly becoming unprofitable: you had to feed and house a slave when times were bad. You could just fire an Irishman and hire another when business got better. Russia actually freed the serfs in 1862, a year before Lincoln freed the slaves in lands held by the Confederacy.

How it is you think I have benefitted from slavery is beyond me. I grew up in Ohio where there never was any slavery. My family immigrated to America in 1858, four years before slavery in America was abolished. We never owned any slaves. My gg-grandfather was a soldier in the 29th Ohio Infantry: he was fighting to free the slaves (and punish the south for treason). For you southerners: WE were the ones who marched through Georgia. Sherman gave specific orders that private homes were not to be harmed, but Yankee soldiers, angered at the site of children with whipping scars, started burning southern homes. And how do you think they chose which ones to burn? By the whipping post in the yard.

For a different perspective on the slave trade, read "Skeletons on the Saqara." It's a true story about some shipwrecked American sailors who were captured by Arab slave traders and became slaves. The captain eventually got word to the British consulate in Musqat and arranged ransom for all but two of the crew. Those two were never seen again.

Ozi, you need to read up on the history of the Masons. Though not a member, I work with the Midian Shrine Temple in Wichita on a regular basis. My piping instructor is a Mason and a Presbyterian and several of the members of my pipe band are both Masons and Christians. There is not one single pagan among them.

As for pagan architecture: Thomas Jefferson pushed for the adoption of Greco-Roman architecture in America. It caught on famously. So, I guess you're right about that.

In short, Ozi, you know as much about America and Americans as most Americans know about Islam, which is to say: Not Much.
Doug




QUOTE
From what I have been reading these past couple of days, the Quran, having been dictated by one man, lacks the interpolation common in the Bible. In the Bible, scribes and redactors made changes and filled in the blanks (This was continued in the Midrash after the Bible was closed.). So, we may reasonably assume that the Quran is the word of Muhammed and that there was very little opportunity for alteration between the time he spoke the words and the time they were recorded. Occasionally, Muhammed would dictate a verse and tell the scribe to stick it in with other verses on the same topic, so the Quran does not always preserve the sequence.


Firstly you cannot compare the quran and the bible, the latter has no original source or language available, secondly, the bible does not contain words of jesus, they are a thrid person view. The quran is so much different, for example the language of the quran is vastly different muhammeds own words, which can be found in hadith, the difference is so huge. When muhammed recieved revelations, he had companions who would