QUOTE (seax @ Jun 21 2008, 07:10 PM)

Hello MID,
You are thinking inside the box, you have to think outside the box. All these things you just mentioned are problems, but problems to current propulsion systems. New technology MID---nothing stays the same
makes complete sense.
best regards,
seax
No, no, no. Thinking outside the box is precisely how we accomplished a lunar mission, and how we will accomplish a Mars mission. Of course new technology is at the forefront of what we're doing, just as it was in the past.
However, you are indeed delving into realms of speculation here that are irrelevant to the actual situation at hand pertaining to Mars.
QUOTE
This country spends a lot of black money for projects, and they are not just to make current systems better, they are to create new ones. There is no doubt in my mind, we see these propulsion systems flying all the time, and some people call them UFO's. They are kept quite because a lot of money and work went into them. You don't want someone else to get it for free, and you don't want your opponents to know what you have.
I am going to give you a link, read it, it is an example of a technology I feel is a working system. A retiree from Groom Lake made the comment just a few years ago, the craft could go to the moon and back before lunch, if they left at 6:00 am and back at noon thats about 80 X10 3rd mph or 1333 mps
with a reduction in mass of 89%, some of the hardships you talked about would be nill.
http://www.mufonla.com/tr3b.htmBlack projects...of course. Black projects are black for a reason, to the extent that they actually exist. A Mars mission will not be a black project. It'll be completely white.
You link me to MUFON. That's not something in the realm that I wish to entertain. An interesting description of a major technological acchievement which is based upon speculative physics rergarding a craft which has no substantial evidence of it's existence, and of course there are those references to Edgar Fouche, who believes alot, but who has no credentials which support his beliefs, nor any proof that he ever worked at "Area 51".
NASA and the Air Force have of course, and still do engage in far reaching research, some in the realm of speculative physics. Dr. Robert Forward, who gets mention in the link you provided, was one of those visionaries who was involved in that type of research, and who in fact patented many of the pretty far out things we have today...however, associating him with MUFON and the TR-3B...which is nothing more than a fictional craft (by any reasonable definition), is a little over the top.
You may feel that the TR-3B employs a working system, and you may think we see such things flying all the time, and you're entitled to that, but it's speculative stuff which has no substantiation pertaining to its actual existence at this time.
Further, even IF it does exist, we're talking decades of reseach and development in order to produce a viable craft, which would undoubtedly be utilized for defensive and reconnaisance purposes prior to being fabricated for use in manned exploratory adventures. Such a thing would remain secret for the entire time.
Again...IF it exists, and of course, other than belief, there's nothing to substantiate that.
Even so, why wait?