But the Snopes hoaxed giant is a different "find" than the twin giants submitted by the OP.
As for the "twins" I'd like to know how large they actually are supposed to be. It depends on how far behind the skulls the native excavators really are. Even amateur photographers know how foreshortening can turn any photograph into a "fooler."
tsvr0097
Apr 17 2008, 10:40 PM
Well it does look cool and the sight looked real with other pictures, but with cgi, photoshop and all it's hard to tell and easy to be duped, well not me of course...
Thanks for the feedback
Im-postle-able
Apr 18 2008, 03:21 AM
QUOTE (tsvr0097 @ Apr 18 2008, 05:13 AM)
I'm sure this has been proved a fake, yet I haven't found anything on this forum yet, so please humor me this first post.
It's just a pic of normal sized skeletons with forced perspective making them look larger.. the guys digging are actually much further back..
OldTimeRadio
Apr 18 2008, 07:11 PM
QUOTE (Im-postle-able @ Apr 18 2008, 04:21 AM)
It's just a pic of normal sized skeletons with forced perspective making them look larger.. the guys digging are actually much further back.
I think you're right.
BiffSplitkins
Apr 18 2008, 07:15 PM
That's a pretty cool pic regardless if it's fake or not.
zandel
Apr 19 2008, 01:24 AM
i actually saw that picture in a video or two on youtube trying to pass it off as either Nephilim remains or scientific proof of the bible. although its just a movie scene. What lengths some people will go to believe these days.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.