Hi friends,
I just wanted to share this fascinating material...
Enjoy!

DESTINY IN THE STARS

Joanna Harcourt-Smith and John Lash present three talks on Astrology and What It's Not:

LATEST BROADCAST
April 08, 2008
Introducing the idea that Genius can be inherited, but not from blood-relations: John defines the "endowment" or genomic inheritance we each carry, and demonstrates how to read "Star Base," his unique format of constellational astrology. In conclusion he proposes "biographic empathy," and discusses the possible applications of this alternative system.

PREVIOUS BROADCASTS:
Alternative Zodiac: - March 30, 2008 -
John describes his struggles and conflicts working as a consulting astrologer for 30 years, explaining what led him to formulate an alternative Zodiac based on observation of actual star-patterns. He points out why the word astrology is misleading, although astrology itself is valid on its own terms.

Sign Zodiac and Star Zodiac: - April 01, 2008 -
John details in simple language the difference between the two Zodiacs and proposes what he calls the genotype to contrast with the horoscope. Discussing tropical, sidereal, Vedic versions of astrology, he explains the implications of the true star zodiac (the circle of thirteen constellations), for our notion of destiny.

http://www.futureprimitive.org/stars.php

....I've been swaying away from Constellational, when we only made pictures out of them and gave them meanings. I don't see how they can be significant in non-metaphorical sense.

I've got to agree with Strange.

I listened to the tapes of this guy with the constellational zodiac and it took forever for him to bottom line it...I don't care for anything made up as I find the ancients did a better job of it than any astrologer I have seen to date. IMO of course.