Report: Britain seeks to abolish male royal succession law
5 hours ago

"LONDON (AP) — The British government is seeking to abolish an 18th century royal succession law that requires the daughter of a monarch to make way for her younger brother, a Sunday newspaper reported.

Solicitor General Vera Baird was quoted by The Sunday Times as saying the 1701 law giving male heirs the right to succeed to the throne ahead of any older sisters was unfair and "a load of rubbish."

Officials at the solicitor-general's office were not immediately available Sunday for further comment.

The government is expected to use new equality legislation to guarantee women's succession rights, the Times report said.

Queen Elizabeth II succeeded to the throne only because she had no brothers.

When the queen's daughter, Princess Anne, was born, she was third in line to the throne, behind her mother — then Princess Elizabeth — and her brother Prince Charles.

As her brothers Andrew and Edward were born, Anne dropped down the line of succession, where she is currently 10th.

Opposition Liberal Democrat equalities spokeswoman Lynne Featherstone agrees the rule should be "confined to the dustbin of history."

"This is the perfect time to do this when there is no one who will be affected," Featherstone was quoted as saying by the newspaper

The report says Baird also wants to repeal the law banning the heir to the throne from marrying a Catholic. "

Couldn't we just abolish the monarchy altogether

Wishful thinking , my dear !

That would be anice idea,
an that big house of thiers in central london would make nice apartments.

About bloody time, but I agree we don't need them.

Never going to happen. Plus, why would you want to? We (the public) gain nothing by getting rid of them, and lose a hell of a lot.

monarchies suck..everywhere .