QUOTE (VincentHunter @ Apr 25 2008, 04:51 PM)

Okay, I'm sure we've all seen these topics before. but it was just something that I was wondering after me and my sister discussed god and cloning.
So I say cloning is good, it'll help us, instead of waiting for someone to die, clone a new, fully compatible organ, give it the patient who needs it, fixed. We don't need to clone humans like in sixth day, no. Just organs, brains if need be, though chances are it might not work but, we say we tried. I'm not saying clone to extend life beyond death, Clone to extend life, UNTIL death, or until they get ran over by a person waving around a bible going "Sin against god!", forgive me everyone if that offended you.
Now, my sister's argument can be summed up in only a few words. Going. Against. God. Perhaps, but if god didn't want us cloning, he'd cause a few discouraging mishaps, right? Maybe not, but still, he might do something about it. Now, I don't personally believe in anything, but I'll say I believe in Shiva just to get people to leave me alone. BUT! Now here comes the all mighty "Who's right?" But I don't say that, I say, am I wrong? Now she doesn't like the idea of cloning, only looking on the negative side, I look on the positive side and see lots of good that can be done with such things.
Now, some people will say science is satan's ryhmes with witch, but I don't see it that way, it's what the people want the scientists to do with science that IS bad, not the people doing it. Now, handling deadly diseases, bad, but also good so we can find a cure, my sister says that's bad for whatever i can't recall right now, but I'm sure she'd say it is. Because we have to infect someone or something with it so we can test the cure, sure we can test it probably without doing so, which I see as ten times safer. But would it work the same?
Now, god might probably see that as bad, which I also must agree, it is because if it doesn't work, it's like murder. But could be used also as a step in the right direction, see what went wrong for whatever horrible reason.
Now, again, i'm not saying we clone disney, GOD no! Though I'm sure people will say we can clone the greatest minds of our time, and a few will probably say Bush, and of course they may spark ye old flame war but let's try to avoid that. Now, for the simple question. Am I wrong? or has this all been a waste of time?
Well, I'm against cloning, but not because it's "evil" in any deity's eyes. Cloning could be quite beneficial to humanity as a whole, but if our population continues to grow at it's current rate (which would be accelerated even MORE if we could prolong life and create more humans whenever we wished) then we will eventually overpopulate the planet and kill ourselves and every other life form on this planet. Our economics are ALREADY strained because of lack of food, and there are already many countries that are starving to death. How long until we run out of food entirely? Not long if our population continues to grow. I believe, according to the current model, that the human population will reach 10 billion individuals by 2050. We're already under so much strain at 6 billion, just think of how strained we would be at 10 billion. Deforestation would be widespread because more houses would need to be built, precious natural habitats and organisms would become extinct because of habitat encroachment, poverty and disease would become more widespread because of an increase in population and the demand for food, and the economic system that keeps certain countries in power (such as the US) would crumble. The only reason the US is so powerful and wealthy is because we step on other, less powerful countries in order to get what we want. We don't offer them help because we wouldn't gain anything out of it. Why would that change if the population got bigger? It wouldn't, plain and simple. Humans right now just don't care about others. We have far to much prejudice, discrimination, and stereotypes in this world. They prevent us from being united as a whole. Until we figure out how to work as a united force and get rid of the negative associations between our countries, we will continue to suffer and fall further into poverty, civil unrest, war, and famine.
Furthermore, if we start cloning humans, even organs, we will want these to be the best they can. Could this not develop into social darwinism? If we decide to make human genetics a standard that everyone is influenced by, then we will be slaves to our own genetic codes. You, and I will be considered at the bottom of the social scale because of our imperfect genetics. Gametes will be edited so that they are genetically "perfect" which would change the social structure of our entire world in drastic ways. The movie Gattaca perfectly describes this scenario. We would only have a successful chance at life if we were perfect, and if we weren't we would be discriminated against and a whole new type of social prejudice would be created. Sure, we could start small and develop organs for people who need them, but it's only a matter of time until we start to edit and change the human genotype. There are incredible ramifications if we decide to start cloning humans. Sure, there are benefits, but in the long run it will only harm our planet all far, far more than it will help it. Humanity is too short-sighted in it's goals. We don't understand that our actions have irreversible effects on our own population as well as the planet as a whole. Until we learn to recognize and understand the consequences of our actions, we're far from being able to clone humans from a morally correct standpoint. In this way fundamentalists have a point; we shouldn't try to perfect the human race, because in the end we, and everything else on our planet, will only end up suffering.