QUOTE
For me, it depends on mood. Animals flock over to me when i'm in a good mood and seem to slink away when i'm in a bad mood. That seems telepathic too right?
I've never seen any animal behavior, wild or domestic, that seemed "telepathic," except as a way of speaking to describe the cleverness and efficiency with which many animals use the sensory information available to them. The impression is strengthened, of course, if the information available to them is either unavailable to us, or we don't think of using it.
Not that this applies to the original poster, but I think this is a factor in some people's attitudes towards animals, so I will add it to the mix. "Animal paranormality" is, for
some people, yet another vehicle by which people explain away the genuine cognitive capability of other animals. It is much more palatable for some people to think that Spot is psychic than to think that Spot is a fully realized intelligent being.
The current "drop dead" evidence for canine paranormality is the routine observation that dogs will often clearly anticipate (marked by unmistakable and purposeful changes in their behavior) the return home of their human packmates, even if the return is "unexpected."
Unexpected by whom? Just because Joe was surpised that Jane came home early is no reason to dismiss that the reason why Fido wasn't was because Fido used more and better information than Joe did, or used the same information better than Joe did.
So, you hear things like "but Fido is just a dog, he couldn't possibly have known that the reason why Jane came early was because she had chosen too light a jacket for the chilly day that today turned out to be." Says who?
Add to that that Jane herself may be unable to articulate why she "jut felt like" coming home early today. Talk about unpalatable: the alternative to "Fido is psychic" is that Fido knows Jane better than she knows herself.