Does the US have enough military power to effectivly engage in another war?

Does the US Govt have enough money to engage in another war?

If Bush started another war with Iran, isn't there some kind of law saying he can stay in power until the after the war is over?

I think thats it...thanks

No, to all of your questions.
He can declare Martial Law in the USA itself which would automatically suspend all elections, but he would need to prove that Martial Law is justified. Then again, he might just do it for the hell of it.

Money... is the lives of the people.

To engage in another war the US would have to enslave the people(we have no money, and soon neither will the people) which is underway.

They blame the debt on us, and wham we are under martial law and being drafted.

Fight back the end is nigh!

although the moron thought out loud of postponing the 04 elections out of fear. He has been one of the biggest blights on America. and just as big is the congress that ignores it all.

Yes we have enough power, it’s called bombs and the carriers that hold the plans that can drop them.

Hell no, we didn't have enough money to engage in the second Iraq war; just look at the disaster relief in New Orleans; where was the help and equipment? - It was in Iraq!

And for the third question; I don’t know, but that Presidential war time clause does seem like a big loop hole that George has used extensively.

To topic poster: well, let me answer your questions out of order.

Question 2) "Does the US Govt have enough money to engage in another war?" NO NO NO, however, that is the point in my mind actually. The US dollar can only fail if we keep borrowing money, which in my view is "their" plan. ...AMERO...

which now brings me to question number 1) "Does the US have enough military power to effectivly engage in another war?" The answer is NO for ground forces, but as I have said long ago (heh mabey not so long ago) the plan is to bomb IRAN to hell IF we are "attacked."

this brings me to question 3) "If Bush started another war with Iran, isn't there some kind of law saying he can stay in power until the after the war is over?"

the answer to that comes from new orders Bush enacted, that say Martial Law can be enacted for any natural disaster or terrorist attack that threatens our NATIONAL security.

This brings me to a rant. "THEY" do not want national security, the same "THEY" who wanted a helpful pearl harbor event to upgrade the millitary and attack Iraq. "THEY" want another helpful pearl harbor event (the second one being 9/11/01) that will let us go to Iran, probably during a Martial Law, probably due to some "TERRORIST" attack on our or Israel's soil.

This would send Americans screaming to destroy Iran. This would enact martial law. This would send us so far in debt that the dollar just may fail as inflation would soar... Iran would be ours to control, much like Iraq.
The NAU would be a nesecity(sp?) to not go bankrupt, or after going bankrupt as a nation. These things ARE very real to me, and could happen at any time.

My sources(sources: don't take that the wrong way though. I was being recruited for special forces due to my smarts and that I look very milddle eastern when I am tan. I spoke to many green berets who have been monitoring Iran's nuclear capability as they are actually a real threat, just not quite yet. And this is where they try to make people like me look stupid, as if I am saying Iran is harmless or something.) tell me that Iran can not have nukes for another 7 years round abouts, unless someone helps them emencely(sp?).

This means that a false flag would most likely have something to do with some "terrorist group" getting unsecured nukes from someware, and this terrorist group would be "somehow" connected with Iran. "THEY" would then of course have to bomb all Iranian nuclear facilities, and all weopons facilities, above and below ground...

but these are only my thoughts on the matter. I am sure other people have other thoughts?


~muddy